Fault tolerance in noise-enhanced propagation

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2000, Pages

  Perazzo, R ^a   Romanelli, L ^b   Deza, R ^c  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b INSTITUTO DE CIENCIAS   (Argentina)

^c UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE MAR DEL PLATA   (Argentina)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADDITIVE NOISE; CHAINS;

BI-STABLE OSCILLATORS; CRITICAL VALUE; DEAD NEURONS; EMERGENT PROPERTY; FAULT-TOLERANT; LOW-FREQUENCY PERIODIC SIGNALS; NOISE INTENSITIES; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

FAULT TOLERANCE;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; NOISE; OSCILLOMETRY; PHYSICS; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICS; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; NOISE; OSCILLOMETRY; PHYSICS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; SYNAPTIC TRANSMISSION;

EID: 0001719617     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R3287     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. B. McNamara and K. Wiesenfeld, Phys. Rev. A 39, 4854 (1989).
2. L. Gammaitoni, P. Hänggi, P. Jung, and F. Marchesoni, Rev. Mod. Phys. 70, 223 (1998).
3. A. Longtin, A. R. Bulsara, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 656 (1991).
4. F. Moss, in Contemporary Problems in Statistical Physics, edited by G. H. Weiss (SIAM, Philadelphia, 1994), pp. 205–253.
5. A. Longtin, J. Stat. Phys. 70, 309 (1993)
6. A. Longtin, A. R. Bulsara, D. Pierson, and F. Moss, Biol. Cybern. 70, 159 (1994).
7. J. K. Douglas, L. Wilkens, E. Pantazelou, and F. Moss, Nature (London) 365, 337 (1993)
8. Nature (London)J. J. Collins, C. C. Chow, and T. T. Imhoff, 376, 236 (1995)
9. Nature (London)S. M. Bezrukov and I. Vodyanoy, 378, 362 (1995).
10. X. Pei, J. Wilkens, and F. Moss, J. Neurophysiol. 76, 3002 (1996).
11. K. Wiesenfeld, D. Pierson, E. Pantazelou, C. Dames, and F. Moss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2125 (1994).
12. F. Chapeaux-Blondeau, X. Godivier, and N. Chambet, Phys. Rev. E 53, 1273 (1996).
13. J. F. Lindner, B. K. Meadows, W. L. Ditto, M. E. Inchiosa, and A. R. Bulsara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3 (1995)
14. J. F. LindnerB. K. MeadowsW. L. DittoM. E. InchiosaA. R. BulsaraPhys. Rev. E 53, 2081 (1996).
15. F. Marchesoni, L. Gammaitoni, and A. Bulsara, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 2609 (1996).
16. F. Castelpoggi and H. S. Wio, Europhys. Lett. 38, 91 (1997).
17. M. Löcher, D. Cigna, and E. R. Hunt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5212 (1998).
18. Y. Zhang, G. Hu, and L. Gammaitoni, Phys. Rev. E 58, 2952 (1998).
19. J. F. Lindner, S. Chandramouli, A. Bulsara, M. Löcher, and W. Ditto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 5048 (1998).
20. J. Hertz, A. Krogh, and R. Palmer, Introduction to the Theory of Neural Computation (Addison-Wesley, Redwood, CA, 1991), and references therein.
21. The concept of a decay length has been also used in Refs. 1415 and plays the role of the correlation distance introduced in Ref. 10. There is also a time-correlation interval 10: the uncorrelated noise (Formula presented) shortens this interval as D grows, until it becomes comparable with the integration step (Formula presented).