Comment on 'The electronic structure of CaCuO2 and SrCuO2'

Journal of Physics Condensed Matter

Volumn 12, Issue 26, 2000, Pages 5809-5812

  Rosner, H ^a   Divis M ^b   Koepernik, K ^c   Drechsler, S L ^a   Eschrig, H ^a  

^a IFW DRESDEN   (Germany)

^b CHARLES UNIVERSITY   (Czech Republic)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR CHEMICAL PHYSICS OF SOLIDS   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001687370     PISSN: 09538984     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/12/26/401     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Wu H et al 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 4637
2. Wu H, Qian M C and Zheng Q 1999 J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 11 209
3. Anisimov V I, Zaanen J and Andersen O K 1991 Phys. Rev. B 44 943
4. Singh D, Pickett W and Krakauer H 1989 Physica C 162-164 1431
5. Mattheiss L F and Hamann D R 1989 Phys. Rev. B 40 2217
6. Popović Z S and Vukajlović F R 1998 Solid State Commun. 106 415
7. Koepernik K and Eschrig H 1999 Phys. Rev. B 59 1743
8. Blaha B, Schwarz K and Luitz J 1990 Comput. Phys. Commun. 59 399
9. Vaknin D et al 1989 Phys. Rev. B 39 9122
10. Pickett W E 1989 Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 433
11. Nagasako N et al 1997 J. Phys. Soc. Japan 66 1756
12. We suppose that the authors calculated the same magnetic unit cell and spin structure, but there is no information about that in [1].
13. max ≈ 150 meV can be derived from figure 3 of [11]. The large gap of 550 meV reported in [1] clearly contradicts the claim of Wu et al to reproduce the bandstructure of [11] by backfolding.