Multiple shrinkage and subset selection in wavelets

Biometrika

Volumn 85, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 391-401

  Clyde, Merlise ^a   Parmigiani, Giovanni ^a   Vidakovic, Brani ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001682758     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/85.2.391     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1978). A new look at the Bayes procedure. Biometrika 65, 53-9.
2. BRUCE, A. & CAO, H-Y. (1994). S+ Wavelets, Users Manual Seattle: StatSci.
3. CHIPMAN, H., KOLACZYK, E. & McCuLLOCii, R. (1997). Adaptive Bayesian wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 92, 1413-21.
4. CLYDE, M., DESIMONE, H. & PARMIGIANI, G. (1996). Prediction via orthogonalized model mixing. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 91, 1197-208.
5. DAUBECHIES, I. (1988). Orthonormal bases of compactly supported wavelets. Com/nun. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 909-96.
6. DAUBECHIES, I. (1992). Ten Lectures on Wavelets. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.
7. DONOHO, D. & JOIINSTONE, I. (1994). Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81, 425-55.
8. DONOHO, D. & JOHNSTONE, I. (1995). Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 90, 1200-24.
9. DONOHO, D., JOHNSTONE, L, KERKYACHARIAN, G. & PICARD, D. (1995). Wavelet shrinkage: Asymptopia? (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57, 301-69.
10. DRAPER, D. (1995). Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty (with Discussion). J. R. Statist. Soc. B 57, 45-98.
11. FOSTER, D. & GEORGE, E. (1994). The risk inflation criterion for multiple regression. Ann. Statist. 22,1947-75.
12. GEORGE, E. (1986). Combining minimax shrinkage estimators. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 81, 437-45.
13. GEORGE, E. I. & McCuixocH, R. (1993). Variable selection via Gibbs sampling. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 88,881-9.
14. GEORGE, E. I. & McCuLLOCH, R. (1997). Fast Bayes variable selection. Statist. SMca 7, 339-74.
15. MALLAT, S. (1989). A theory for multi-resolution signal decomposition: the wavelet representation. IEEE Trans. Pat. Anal. Mach. Intel. 11, 674-93.
16. RAFTERY, A. E., MADIGAN, D. M. & VOLINSKY, C. T. (1996). Accounting for model uncertainty in survival analysis improves predictive performance (with Discussion). In Bayesian Statistics 5, Ed. J. M. Bernardo, J. O. Berger, A. P. Dawid and A. F. M. Smith, pp. 323-50. Oxford: Oxford University Press.