Hydrodynamic interaction of curved bodies allowing slip on their surfaces

Langmuir

Volumn 12, Issue 24, 1996, Pages 5963-5968

  Vinogradova, Olga I ^a  

^a Institute of Physical Chemistry Moscow   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001680862     PISSN: 07437463     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/la960531u     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Actually, Reynolds considered only parallel surfaces (see Reynolds, O. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. (London) 1886, 157, 177) and did not state this dependence, although it follows from his theory (and is usually attributed to him, especially in the colloid literature).
2. de Gennes, P.-G. C. R. Acad. Sci. 1979, 288B, 219.
3. Vinogradova, O. I. Langmuir 1995, 11, 2213.
4. Schnell, E. J. Appl. Phys. 1956, 27, 1149.
5. Tolstoi, D. M. Dokl. Acad. Nauk SSSR 1952, 85, 1329.
6. Somov, A. N. Kolloidn. Zh. 1982, 44, 160.
7. Churaev, N. V.; Sobolev, V. D.; Somov, A. N. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1984, 97, 574.
8. Blake, T. D. Colloids Surf. 1990, 47, 135.
9. 10-14
10. Brochard, F.; de Gennes, P.-G. Langmuir 1992, 8, 3033.
11. Migler, K. B.; Hervet, H.; Leger, L. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1993, 70, 287.
12. Migler, K. B.; Massey, G.; Hervet, H.; Leger, L. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 1994, 6, A301.
13. Ajdari, A.; Brochard-Wyart, F.; de Gennes, P. G., Leibler, L.; Viovy, J. L.; Rubinstein, M. Physica A 1994, 204, 17.
14. Sung, W. Phys. Rev. E 1995, 51, 5862.
15. Henson, D. J.; Mackay, M. E. J. Reol. 1995, 39, 359.
16. Kissi, N. E.; Piau, J. M. C. R. Acad. Sci. 1989, 309, 7.
17. Alexeyev, A. A.; Vinogradova O. I. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1996, 108, 173.
18. Hocking, L. M. J. Eng. Math. 1973, 7, 207.
19. Potanin, A. A.; Ur'ev, N. B.; Muller, V. M. Kolloidn. Zh. 1988, 50, 493.
20. Vinogradova, O. I. Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects 1994, 82, 247.
21. Vinogradova, O. I. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 169, 306.
22. 2,3,25 If so, the model (1.1) is applicable only for the separations which are greater than the thickness of the layer with modified viscosity.
23. Israelachvili, J. N. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1986, 110, 263.
24. Chan, D. Y. C.; Horn, R. G. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 5311.
25. Derjaguin, B. V.; Churaev, N. V. Langmuir 1987, 3, 607.
26. Israelachvili, J. N.; Adams, G. E. J. Chem. Soc., Faraday Trans. 1 1978, 74, 975.
27. Claesson, P. M.; Christenson, H. K. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 1650.
28. The configuration of the two spheres is also applicable, see Parker, J. L. Langmuir 1992, 8, 551.
29. Superscripts - and + refer to the minimum and maximum radii, respectively.
30. The curvature is defined as the inverse of the radius of curvature.
31. To exclude possible confusion we will later specify were necessary whether we are talking about original (two) or the effective (one) curved surfaces.
32. Deijaguin, B. V. Kolloid Z. 1934, 69, 155.
33. White, L. R. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1983, 95, 286.
34. Stewart, A. M. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1995, 170, 287.
35. Here we use the film thickness as a reference length scale, so that the simplified problem may in principle be not solvable in the sense that the boundary conditions involving other length scales cannot be applied (see Introduction and ref 3). We will see however that in our case the simplified problem appears to be consistent and quite regular.
36. s on the axis z.
37. In actual fact in our problem h is the length scale as well as a characteristics of the configuration geometry. These two physical aspects of a single parameter should not be confused. As a length scale h appears only in the correction for slippage (and has no relation to the invariants), while in the geometrical factor h can be expressed through the invariants of the surface (2.3).
38. Vinogradova, O. I. Kolloidn. Zh. 1996, 58, 590.