Variation in annual estimates of effective population size for San Joaquin kit foxes

Animal Conservation

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 179-184

  Otten, Mark R M ^a   Cypher, Brian L ^b  

^a Nav Petrol Reserves in California   (United States)

^b NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANIDAE; MACROTIS; VULPES; VULPES MACROTIS MUTICA;

EID: 0001656849     PISSN: 13679430     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1367943098000146     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Caballero, A. (1994). Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73: 657-679.
2. Chepko-Sade, B. D. & Shields, W. M. (1987). The effects of dispersal and social structure on effective population size. In Mammalian dispersal patterns: the effects of social structure on population genetics: 287-321. Chepko-Sade, B. D. & Halpin, Z. T. (Eds). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
3. Cypher, B. L., Warrick, G. D., Otten, M. R. M., O'Farrell, T. P., Berry, W. H., Harris, C. E., Kato, T. T., McCue, P. M., Scrivner, J. H. & Zoellick, B. W. (In review). Population dynamics of San Joaquin kit foxes at the Naval Petroleum Reserves in California. Wildl. Monogr.
4. Egoscue, H. J. (1975). Dynamics of the kit fox in western Utah. Bull. South. Calif. Acad. Sci. 74: 122-127.
5. Frankham, R. (1995). Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. 66: 95-107.
6. Franklin, I. R. (1980). Evolutionary change in small populations. In Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective: 135-150. Soulé, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A. (Eds). Sunderland: Sinauer Press.
7. Gilligan, D. M., Woodworth, L. M., Montgomery, M. E., Briscoe, D. A. & Frankham, R. (1997). Is mutation accumulation a threat to the survival of endangered species? Conserv. Biol. 11: 1235-1241.
8. Hill, W. G. (1972). Effective size of populations with overlapping generations. Theoret. Pop. Biol. 3: 278-289.
9. Hill, W. G. (1979). A note on effective population size with overlapping generations. Genetics 92: 317-322.
10. Kimura, M. & Crow, J. F. (1963). The measurement of effective population number. Evolution 17: 279-288.
11. Lande, R. (1995). Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9: 782-791.
12. Lande, R. & Barrowclough, G. F. (1987). Effective population size, genetic variation, and their use in population monitoring. In Viable populations for conservation: 87-123. Soulé, M. E. (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Latter, B. D. H. & Mulley, J. C. (1995). Genetic adaptation to captivity and inbreeding depression in small laboratory populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 139: 255-266.
14. Lynch, M., Conery, J. & Bürger, R. (1995). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489-518.
15. Mace, G. M. & Lande, R. (1991). Assessing extinction threats: toward a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol. 5: 148-157.
16. Major, J. (1977). California climates in relation to vegetation. In Terrestrial vegetation of California: 11-74. Barbour, M. G. & Major, J. (Eds). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
17. McGrew, J. C. (1979). Vulpes macrotis. Mamm. Species 123: 1-6.
18. Mills, L. S. & Allendorf, F. W. (1996). The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1509-1518.
19. Morrell, S. (1972). Life history of the San Joaquin kit fox. Calif. Fish and Game 58: 162-174.
20. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (1996). Local climatological data, annual summary with comparative data, Bakersfield, California. Report No. ISSN 0198-0696. Asheville: US Department of Commerce, National Climatic Data Center.
21. Nunney, L. (1993). The influence of mating system and overlapping generations on effective population size. Evolution 47: 1329-1341.
22. Nunney, L. (1996). The influence of variation in female fecundity on effective population size. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59: 411-425.
23. Nunney, L. & Elam, D. R. (1994). Estimating the effective population size of conserved populations. Conserv. Biol. 8: 175-184.
24. Ralls, K. & White, P. J. (1995). Predation on San Joaquin kit foxes by larger canids. J. Mammal. 76: 723-729.
25. Sawyer, J. O. & Keeler-Wolf, T. (1995). A manual of California vegetation. Sacramento: California Native Plant Society.
26. Soulé, M. E. (1980). Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective: 135-150. Soulé, M. E. & Wilcox, B. A. (Eds). Sunderland: Sinauer Press.
27. Spiegel, L. K. & Disney, M. (1996). Mortality sources and survival rates of San Joaquin kit fox in oil-developed and undeveloped lands of southwestern Kern County, California. In Studies of the San Joaquin kit fox in undeveloped and oil-developed areas: 71-91. Spiegel, L. K. (Ed.). Sacramento: California Energy Commission.
28. Spiegel, L. K. & Tom, J. (1996). Reproduction of San Joaquin kit fox in undeveloped and oil-developed habitats of Kern County, California. In Studies of the San Joaquin kit fox in undeveloped and oil-developed areas: 53-69. Spiegel, L. K. (Ed.). Sacramento: California Energy Commission.
29. US Department of the Interior (1983). San Joaquin kit fox recovery plan. Portland: US. Fish and Wildlife Service.
30. Vucetich, J. A. & Waite, T. A. (In press). Number of censuses required for demographic estimation of effective population size. Conserv. Biol.
31. Vucetich, J. A., Waite, T. A. & Nunney, L. (1997). Fluctuating population size and the ratio of effective to census population size. Evolution 51: 2015-2019.
32. Waite, T. A. & Parker, P. G. (1996). Dimensionless life histories and effective population size. Conserv. Biol. 10: 1456-1462.
33. White, P. J. & Ralls, K. (1993). Reproduction and spacing patterns of kit foxes relative to changing prey availability. J. Wildl. Mgmt. 57:861-867.
34. White, P. J., Vanderbilt White, C. A. & Ralls, K. (1996). Functional and numerical responses of kit foxes to a short-term decline in mammalian prey. J. Mammal. 77: 370-376.
35. Williams, D. F., Cypher, E. A., Kelly, P. A., Norvell, N., Johnson, C. D., Colliver, G. C. & Miller, K. J. (1997). Recovery plan for upland species of the San Joaquin Valley, California. Portland: US Fish and Wildlife Service.
36. Wright, S. (1931). Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16: 97-159.
37. Wright, S. (1938). Size of population and breeding structure in relation to evolution. Science 87: 430-431.
38. Zar, J. H. (1984). Biostatistical analysis. 2nd edn. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.