Strong items get suppressed, weak items do not: The role of item strength in output interference

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 459-463

  Bäuml, Karl Heinz ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF REGENSBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001649844     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03208822     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ANDERSON, M. C., BJORK, R. A., & BJORK, E. L. (1994). Remembering can cause forgetting: Retrieval dynamics in long-term memory. Journal at Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1063-1087.
2. ANDERSON, M. C., & SPELLMAN, B. A. (1995). On the status of inhibitory mechanisms in cognition: Memory retrieval as a model case. Psychological Review, 102, 68-100.
3. BATTIG, W. F., & MONTAGUE, W. E. (1969). Category norms for verbal items in 56 categories: A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 80, 1-46.
4. BÄUML, K.-H. (1996). Revisiting an old issue: Retroactive interference as a function of the degree of original and interpolated learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 380-384.
5. BÄUML, K.-H. (1997). The list-strength effect: Strength-dependent competition or suppression? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 260-264.
6. BRAINERD, C. J., REYNA, V. F., HARNISHFEGER, K. K., & HOWE, M. L. (1993). Is retrievability grouping good for recall? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 122, 249-268.
7. BRAINERD, C. J., REYNA, V. F., HOWE, M. L., & KEVERSHAN, J. (1990). The last shall be first: How memory strength affects children's retrieval. Psychological Science, 1, 247-252.
8. DAPOLITO, F. J. (1966). Proactive effects with independent retrieval of competing responses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University.
9. MANNHAUPT, H.-R. (1983). Produktionsnormen für verbale Reaktionen zu 40 geläufigen Kategorien [German category norms for verbal items in 40 categories]. Sprache & Kognition, 4, 264-278.
10. POSTMAN, L., STARK, K., & FRASER, J. (1968). Temporal changes in interference. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 7, 672-694.
11. RAAIJMAKERS, J. G. W., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
12. ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1973). Inhibition in recall from cueing with recall targets. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 644-657.
13. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & NEELY, J. H. (1982). Retrieval blocks in episodic and semantic memory. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 36, 213-242.
14. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & SCHMIDT, S. R. (1980). Output interference in the recall of categorized and paired associate lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 6, 91-105.
15. RUNDUS, D. (1973). Negative effects of using list items as recall cues. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 12, 43-50.
16. SCHEITHE, K., & BÄUML, K.-H. (1995). Deutschsprachige Normen für Vertreter von 48 Kategorien [German normative data for representatives of 48 categories]. Sprache & Kognition, 14, 39-43.
17. SMITH, A. D. (1971). Output interference and organized recall from long-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 10, 400-408.
18. WHEELER, M. A. (1995). Improvement in recall over time without repeated testing: Spontaneous recovery revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 173-184.
19. WIXTED, J. T., GHADISHA, H., & VERA, R. (1997). Recall latency following pure- and mixed-strength lists: A direct test of the relative strength model of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 523-538.