메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 59, Issue 9, 1999, Pages 6499-6516

Nonlinear hydrodynamics and tilt modulus of flux-line liquids

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0001633171     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.6499     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (11)

References (52)
  • 16
    • 85038925107 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Another possibility is that the longitudinal gauge symmetry is recovered first, while the translational symmetry remains broken, yielding a “supersolid” phase.
    • Another possibility is that the longitudinal gauge symmetry is recovered first, while the translational symmetry remains broken, yielding a “supersolid” phase.
  • 19
  • 21
    • 7544228288 scopus 로고
    • Phys. Rev. Lett.T. ChenS. Teitel74, 2792 (1995).
    • (1995) , vol.74 , pp. 2792
    • Chen, T.1    Teitel, S.2
  • 46
    • 85038894641 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • As stressed by TN (Ref. 28) this factorization corresponds to the computation of the one-loop contributions to the correlator (Formula presented) and goes beyond the Gaussian approximation. It yields a consistent result only for the transverse part of the tilt autocorrelator that determines the tilt modulus. To evaluate corrections to the longitudinal part of (Formula presented) to the same order one also needs to evaluate one-loop corrections to the phase correlator, (Formula presented)
    • As stressed by TN (Ref. 28) this factorization corresponds to the computation of the one-loop contributions to the correlator (Formula presented) and goes beyond the Gaussian approximation. It yields a consistent result only for the transverse part of the tilt autocorrelator that determines the tilt modulus. To evaluate corrections to the longitudinal part of (Formula presented) to the same order one also needs to evaluate one-loop corrections to the phase correlator, (Formula presented)
  • 48
    • 85038926255 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • There is a discrepancy of a factor of two between our result for the normal-fluid fraction in the limit (Formula presented) and the result of Ref. 15. We believe that this is due to a typo in Ref. 15
    • There is a discrepancy of a factor of two between our result for the normal-fluid fraction in the limit (Formula presented) and the result of Ref. 15. We believe that this is due to a typo in Ref. 15.
  • 49
    • 85038947111 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996), p. 337.
    • M. Tinkham, Introduction to Superconductivity, 2nd ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1996), p. 337.
  • 50
    • 85038959293 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • See, for instance, p. 1135 of Ref. 1
    • See, for instance, p. 1135 of Ref. 1.
  • 52
    • 85038971941 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This nonrelativistic approximation we can use the 2D Coulomb gauge rather than the more general Lorentz gauge.
    • In this nonrelativistic approximation we can use the 2D Coulomb gauge rather than the more general Lorentz gauge.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.