Reserve scenarios for the Cape Peninsula: High-, middle- And low-road options for conserving the remaining biodiversity

Biodiversity and Conservation

Volumn 5, Issue 5, 1996, Pages 649-669

  Trinder Smith, T H ^a   Lombard, A T ^a   Picker, M D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Cape Peninsula; Fynbos biome; Iterative selection algorithm; Reserve design

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001602144     PISSN: 09603115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF00137613     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1991) Scores and score classes for evaluation criteria: A comparison based on the cost of reserving all natural features. Biol. Conserv. 56, 281-94.
2. Bedward, M., Pressey, R.L. and Keith, D. A. (1992) A new approach for selecting fully representative reserve networks: addressing efficiency, reserve design and land suitability with an iterative analysis. Biol. Conserv. 62, 115-25.
3. Pressey, R.L. and Nicholls, A.O. (1989) Efficiency in conservation evaluation: scoring versus iterative approaches. Biol. Conserv. 50, 199-218.
4. Rapoport, E.H., Borioli, G., Monjeau, J.A. and Oviedo, R.D. (1986) The design of nature reserves A simulation trial for assessing specific conservation value. Biol. Conserv. 37, 269-90.
5. van Wilgen, B.W. (1996) Management of the natural ecosystems of the Cape Peninsula: current status and future prospects. Biodiv. Conserv. 5, 671-84.
6. Williams, P.H., Humphries, C.J. and Vane-Wright, R.I. (1991) Measuring biodiversity: Taxonomic relatedness for conservation priorities. Aust. Syst. Bot. 4, 667-79.