Missing players: Phonology and the past-tense debate

Lingua

Volumn 112, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 157-199

  Burzio, Luigi ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Lexicon; Memorization; Morphology; Optimality; Phonology; Regularity; Rules; Underlying representation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001599816     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00041-9     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Anderson, S.R., 1991. Amorphous morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Benua, L., 1997. Transderivational identity: Phonological relations between words, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts, Amherst.
3. Booij, G. and I. Rubach, 1987. Postcyclic versus post-lexical rules in Lexical Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 144.
4. Boersma, P., 1998. Functional phonology. The Hague: Holland Academic Graphics.
5. Borowsky, T., 1993. 'On the word level'. In: S. Hargus and E. Kaisse (eds.), Phonetics and phonology 4: Studies in Lexical Phonology, 199-234. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
6. Burzio, L., 1987. English stress. In: P.M. Bertinetto and M. Loporcaro (eds.), Certamen Phonologicum, Papers from the 1987 Cortona Phonology Meeting, 153-175. Torino: Rosenberg and Sellier.
7. Burzio, L., 1991. On the metrical unity of Latinate affixes. In: G. Westphal, B. Ao and H.R. Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University. Reprinted in Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 16, 1-27. Revised version in: H. Campos and P.M. Kempchinsky 1995 (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
8. Burzio, L., 1991. On the metrical unity of Latinate affixes. In: G. Westphal, B. Ao and H.R. Chae (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Department of Linguistics, Ohio State University. Reprinted in Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 16, 1-27. Revised version in: H. Campos and P.M. Kempchinsky 1995 (eds.), Evolution and revolution in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Carlos Otero. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
9. Burzio, L., 1993. English stress, Vowel length and modularity. Journal of Linguistics 29(2), 359-418.
10. Burzio, L., 1994a. Principles of English stress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Burzio, L., 1994b. Metrical consistency. In: E.S. Ristad (ed.), Language computations, 93-125. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
12. Burzio, L., 1996. Surface constraints versus underlying representation. In: J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and methods, 123-141. European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.
13. Burzio, L., 1997 Strength in numbers. In: V. Miglio and B. Morén (eds.), University of Maryland Working Papers in Linguistics 5: Selected phonology papers from H-O-T 97, 27, 52.
14. Burzio, L., 1998. Multiple correspondence. Lingua 103, 79-109.
15. Burzio, L., 1999. Surface-to-surface morphology: When your representations turn into constraints. Ms. Johns Hopkins University. (ROA-341-0999; http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html.)
16. Burzio, L., 2000a. Cycles, non-derived-environment blocking, and correspondence. In: J. Dekkers, F. van der Leeuw and J. van de Weijer (eds.), Optimality theory: Syntax, phonology, and acquisition, 47-87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Burzio, L., 2000b. Segmental contrast meets output-to-output faithfulness. The Linguistic Review 17(2/4), 368-384.
18. Bybee, J.L., 1985. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
19. Bybee, J.L., 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In: M. Hammond and M. Noonan (eds.), Theoretical morphology, 119-141. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
20. Bybee, J.L., 1995. Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes 10(5), 425-455.
21. Bybee, J.L., 1996. Productivity, regularity and fusion: How language use affects the lexicon. In: Rajendra Singh (ed.), Trubetzkoy's orphan, 247-269. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter.
22. Clahsen, H. and M. Rothweiler, 1992. Inflectional rules in children's grammars: Evidence from the development of participles in German. Morphology Yearbook, 1-34.
23. Daugherty, K. and M. Seidenberg, 1994. Beyond rules and exceptions: A connectionist approach to inflectional morphology. In: S.D. Lima, R.L.Conigan and G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 353-388. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
24. Flemming, E., 1995. Auditory representations in phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA.
25. Fodor, J.A and Z.W. Pylyshyn, 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.
26. Harris, J., 1994. English sound structure. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
27. Hayes, B., 2000. 'A phonologist's view of the past tense controversy'. Lecture and handout, Johns Hopkins University (10-24-00).
28. Hebb, D.O., 1949. The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.
29. Kenstowicz, M., 1996. Base-identity and uniform exponence: Alternatives to cyclicity. In: J. Durand and B. Laks (eds.), Current trends in phonology: Models and Mmethods, 363-393. European Studies Research Institute, University of Salford Publications.
30. Kiparsky, P., 1982a. Lexical phonology and morphology. In: I.S. Yang (ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm, 3-91. Seoul: Hanshin.
31. Kiparsky, P., 1982b. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In: H. van der Hulst and N. Smith (eds.), The structure of phonological representations, Part I, 131-175. Dordrecht: Foris.
32. Kirchner, R., 1997. Contrastiveness and faithfulness. Phonology 14, 83-113.
33. Lachter, J. and T. Bever, 1988. The relationship between language structure and associative theories of language learning - A constructive critique of some connectionist learning models. Cognition 28, 195-247.
34. Łubowicz, A., 1998. Derived environment effects in OT. Rutgers Optimality Archive #: 239-0198 (http://ruccs.rutgers.edu/roa.html).
35. MacWhinney, B. and J. Leinbach, 1991. Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the Verb Learning Model. Cognition 40, 121-157.
36. Marcus, G.F., U. Brinkmann, H. Clahsen, R. Wiese and S. Pinker, 1995. German inflection: The exception that proves the rule. Cognitive Psychology 29(3), 189-256.
37. Myers, S., 1987. Vowel shortening in English. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 485-18.
38. Pinker, S., 1991. Rules of language. Science 253, 530-535.
39. Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1988. On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition 28, 73-193.
40. Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1992. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society 17, 230-251. Reprinted in: S.D. Lima, R.L. Cotrigan and G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 321-351. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
41. Pinker, S. and A. Prince, 1992. Regular and irregular morphology and the psychological status of rules of grammar. Berkeley Linguistic Society 17, 230-251. Reprinted in: S.D. Lima, R.L. Cotrigan and G.K. Iverson (eds.), The reality of linguistic rules, 321-351. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Plunkett, K. and V. Marchman, 1991. U-shaped learning and frequency effects in a multi-layered perceptron: Implications for child language acquisition. Cognition 38, 43-102.
43. Prince, A. and P. Smolensky, 1993. Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar. Ms., Rutgers University, New Brunswick, and University of Colorado, Boulder.
44. Rumelhart, D.E. and J.L. McClelland, 1986. On learning the past-tenses of English verbs. In: D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 2: Psychological and biological models, 216-271. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Seidenberg, M., 1992. Connectionism without tears. In: S. Davis (ed.), Connectionism: Theory and practice, 84-122. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
46. Seidenberg, M., 1997. Language acquisition and use: Learning and applying probabilistic constraints. Science 275, 1599-1603.
47. Smolensky, P., 1986. Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of Harmony theory. In: D.E. Rumelhart and J.L. McClelland (eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Exploration in the microstructure of cognition, Volume 1: Psychological and biological models, 194-281. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Smolensky, P., 1997. Constraint interaction in generative grammar II: Local conjunction. Paper presented at the Hopkins Optimality Theory Workshop/University of Maryland Mayfest 1997, May 8-12, 1997.
49. Steriade, D., 1994. Positional neutralization and the expression of contrast. Ms., UCLA.
50. Steriade, D., 1997a. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Ms., UCLA.
51. Steriade, D., 1997b. Lexical conservatism. In: SICOL, 1997: Linguistics in the morning calm, 157-179. Seoul, Korea: Hanshin.
52. Steriade, D., 1998. Lexical conservatism in French adjectival liaison. In: J.-M. Authier, B.E. Bullock and L.A. Reed (eds.), Formal perspectives on Romance linguistics, 243-270. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
53. Wilson, C., 2000. Targeted constraints: An approach to contextual neutralization in optimality theory. Ph.D. dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.
54. Yang, C., 2000. Knowledge and learning in natural language. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.