Pseudo-Casimir effect in nematic liquid crystals in frustrating geometries

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2000, Pages 5361-5371

  Ziherl, P ^a,b   Karimi Pour Haddadan, F ^b   Podgornik, R ^a,b   Zumer S ^a,b  

^a JO EF STEFAN INSTITUTE   (Slovenia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LJUBLJANA   (Slovenia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALIGNED FILMS; CASIMIR EFFECTS; DIRECTOR STRUCTURE; EXTERNAL FIELDS; FLUCTUATION-INDUCED INTERACTIONS; NEMATIC SYSTEMS; STRUCTURAL FORCES; STRUCTURAL TRANSITIONS;

NEMATIC LIQUID CRYSTALS;

EID: 0001591779     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.5361     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. H. B. G. Casimir, Proc. K. Ned. Akad. Wet. 51, 793 (1948).
2. H. B. G. Casimir and D. Polder, Phys. Rev. 73, 360 (1948).
3. S. Lamoreaux, Am. J. Phys. 67, 850 (1999).
4. M. Kardar and R. Golestanian, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, 1233 (1999).
5. M. Krech, J. Phys. C 11, R391 (1999).
6. A. Ajdari, L. Peliti, and J. Prost, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1481 (1991).
7. A. Ajdari, B. Duplantier, D. Hone, L. Peliti, and J. Prost, J. Phys. II 2, 487 (1992).
8. H. Li and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 3275 (1991).
9. H. Li and M. Kardar, Phys. Rev. A 46, 6490 (1992).
10. P. Ziherl, R. Podgornik, and S. Žumer, Chem. Phys. Lett. 295, 99 (1998).
11. P. Ziherl, R. Podgornik, and S. Žumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1189 (1999).
12. Liquid Crystals in Complex Geometries, edited by G. P. Crawford and S. Žumer (Taylor & Francis, London, 1996).
13. J. B. Fournier and G. Durand, J. Phys. II 1, 845 (1991).
14. O. D. Lavrentovich, Liq. Cryst. 24, 117 (1998), and references therein.
15. A. Hochbaum and M. M. Labes, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 2998 (1982).
16. The frustration caused by the mismatch of the easy axes across the surface of the cavity or any other external forces is external and should not be mistaken for intrinsic frustration, which pertains to the intermolecular interaction and is also present in some liquid-crystalline systems [see, e.g., E. Fontes, P. A. Heiney, and W. H. de Jeu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 1202 (1988)].
17. G. Barbero and R. Barberi, J. Phys. (Paris) 44, 609 (1983).
18. A. Poniewierski and T. J. Sluckin, Liq. Cryst. 2, 281 (1987).
19. P. G. de Gennes, Langmuir 6, 1448 (1990).
20. O. D. Lavrentovich and V. M. Pergamenshchik, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst. 179, 125 (1990).
21. V. M. Pergamenshchik, Phys. Rev. E 47, 1881 (1993).
22. S. Matsumoto, M. Kawamoto, and K. Mizunoya, J. Appl. Phys. 47, 3842 (1976).
23. The transition from uniform to distorted structure is direct only within the director description of nematic order. In the Landau–de Gennes theory, the two structures are separated by the biaxial structure characterized by uniform director field and nonuniform profiles of the degrees of order and biaxiality—the so-called eigenvalue exchange configuration [P. Palffy-Muhoray, E. C. Gartland, and J. R. Kelly, Liq. Cryst. 16, 713 (1994)
24. A. Šarlah and S. Žumer, Phys. Rev. E 60, 1821 (1999)]. However, deep in the nematic phase the biaxial structure is stable in a very narrow range of thicknesses so that it can be neglected without compromising the basic physics of the hybrid cell.
25. P. G. de Gennes and J. Prost, The Physics of Liquid Crystals (Clarendon, Oxford, 1993).
26. H. Kleinert, Path Integrals in Quantum Mechanics, Statistics, and Polymer Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1995).
27. Note that (Formula presented) does not exist for arbitrary values of d, (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) because (Formula presented) (the inverse square of (Formula presented) can be negative at small (Formula presented)’s. Up to second order in q, this expression is given by (Formula presented) which becomes negative for (Formula presented)’s larger than (Formula presented) The partition function of fluctuations is undefined beyond the structural transition—which is continuous.
28. J. N. Israelachvili, Intermolecular and Surface Forces (Academic, London, 1992).
29. F. Brochard Wyart and J. Daillant, Can. J. Phys. 68, 1084 (1989).
30. S. Herminghaus, K. Jacobs, K. Mecke, J. Bischof, A. Fery, M. Ibn-Elhaj, and S. Schlagowski, Science 282, 916 (1998).
31. F. Vandenbrouck, M. P. Valignat, and A. M. Cazabat, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2693 (1999).
32. P. Ziherl, R. Podgornik, and S. Žumer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1228 (2000).
33. J. N. Israelachvili and G. E. Adams, J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. I 74, 975 (1978).
34. G. S. Iannacchione, G. P. Crawford, S. Qian, J. W. Doane, D. Finotello, and S. Žumer, Phys. Rev. E 53, 2402 (1996).
35. H. Haga and C. W. Garland, Phys. Rev. E 56, 3044 (1997).
36. G. S. Iannacchione, C. W. Garland, J. T. Mang, and T. P. Rieker, Phys. Rev. E 58, 5966 (1998).
37. C. Grosche and F. Steiner, Handbook of Path Integrals (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1998).
38. A. Rapini and M. Papoular, J. Phys. Colloq. 30, C4-54 (1969).
39. A. Mukhopadhyay and B. M. Law, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 772 (1999).
40. R. Garcia and M. H. W. Chan, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1187 (1999).