-
1
-
-
0001302730
-
-
T. A. Apostolatos, D. Kennefick, A. Ori and E. Poisson, Phys. Rev. D 47, 5376 (1993).
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.47
, pp. 5376
-
-
Apostolatos, T.A.1
Kennefick, D.2
Ori, A.3
Poisson, E.4
-
2
-
-
85035224529
-
-
This conjecture was made by one of us (A. Ori) several years ago
-
This conjecture was made by one of us (A. Ori) several years ago.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
85035220431
-
-
Omitted end note
-
Omitted end note.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
0000003090
-
-
An interesting qualitative argument is given
-
An interesting qualitative argument is given inF. D. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3064 (1996).
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. D
, vol.53
, pp. 3064
-
-
Ryan, F.D.1
-
6
-
-
85035201617
-
-
Recently, we have become aware of an independent derivation of this result by Y. Mino, thesis in preparation, Kyoto University, Japan
-
Recently, we have become aware of an independent derivation of this result by Y. Mino, thesis in preparation, Kyoto University, Japan.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
85035216585
-
-
Omitted end note
-
Omitted end note.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
85035230151
-
-
Note that this function C((formula presented) is not unique. This is obvious, for example, from the fact that -1=(formula presented)(x)(formula presented). The function C((formula presented)) can thus be chosen upon convenience
-
Note that this function C((formula presented) is not unique. This is obvious, for example, from the fact that -1=(formula presented)(x)(formula presented). The function C((formula presented)) can thus be chosen upon convenience.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
85035212727
-
-
Taking the differential of the second condition in Eq. (18), (formula presented)=0, does not yield any additional constraint on δ(formula presented) (instead it results in an expression for δ(formula presented
-
Taking the differential of the second condition in Eq. (18), (formula presented)=0, does not yield any additional constraint on δ(formula presented) (instead it results in an expression for δ(formula presented)).
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
85035210982
-
-
Omitted end note
-
Omitted end note.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
85035204752
-
-
This follows, for example, from Eq. (72) below
-
This follows, for example, from Eq. (72) below.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
85035214327
-
-
Of the six coefficients (formula presented) and (formula presented), three vanish identically (formula presented), and (formula presented)) but the other three are generically nonzero
-
Of the six coefficients (formula presented) and (formula presented), three vanish identically (formula presented), and (formula presented)) but the other three are generically nonzero.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
85035221603
-
-
Omitted end note
-
Omitted end note.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
85035197114
-
-
Omitted end note
-
Omitted end note.
-
-
-
-
17
-
-
85035222538
-
-
the Schwarzschild case, it has been found 1 that (formula presented) diverges at the last stable circular orbit, due to the flattening of the effective potential well. Intuitively, one should expect the same behavior in Kerr as well
-
In the Schwarzschild case, it has been found 1 that (formula presented) diverges at the last stable circular orbit, due to the flattening of the effective potential well. Intuitively, one should expect the same behavior in Kerr as well.
-
-
-
|