메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 53, Issue 8, 1996, Pages 4319-4326

Radiation-reaction-induced evolution of circular orbits of particles around kerr black holes

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 0001590828     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.4319     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (70)

References (17)
  • 2
    • 85035224529 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This conjecture was made by one of us (A. Ori) several years ago
    • This conjecture was made by one of us (A. Ori) several years ago.
  • 3
    • 85035220431 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Omitted end note
    • Omitted end note.
  • 5
    • 0000003090 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An interesting qualitative argument is given
    • An interesting qualitative argument is given inF. D. Ryan, Phys. Rev. D 53, 3064 (1996).
    • (1996) Phys. Rev. D , vol.53 , pp. 3064
    • Ryan, F.D.1
  • 6
    • 85035201617 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Recently, we have become aware of an independent derivation of this result by Y. Mino, thesis in preparation, Kyoto University, Japan
    • Recently, we have become aware of an independent derivation of this result by Y. Mino, thesis in preparation, Kyoto University, Japan.
  • 8
    • 85035216585 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Omitted end note
    • Omitted end note.
  • 9
    • 85035230151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Note that this function C((formula presented) is not unique. This is obvious, for example, from the fact that -1=(formula presented)(x)(formula presented). The function C((formula presented)) can thus be chosen upon convenience
    • Note that this function C((formula presented) is not unique. This is obvious, for example, from the fact that -1=(formula presented)(x)(formula presented). The function C((formula presented)) can thus be chosen upon convenience.
  • 11
    • 85035212727 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Taking the differential of the second condition in Eq. (18), (formula presented)=0, does not yield any additional constraint on δ(formula presented) (instead it results in an expression for δ(formula presented
    • Taking the differential of the second condition in Eq. (18), (formula presented)=0, does not yield any additional constraint on δ(formula presented) (instead it results in an expression for δ(formula presented)).
  • 12
    • 85035210982 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Omitted end note
    • Omitted end note.
  • 13
    • 85035204752 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This follows, for example, from Eq. (72) below
    • This follows, for example, from Eq. (72) below.
  • 14
    • 85035214327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Of the six coefficients (formula presented) and (formula presented), three vanish identically (formula presented), and (formula presented)) but the other three are generically nonzero
    • Of the six coefficients (formula presented) and (formula presented), three vanish identically (formula presented), and (formula presented)) but the other three are generically nonzero.
  • 15
    • 85035221603 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Omitted end note
    • Omitted end note.
  • 16
    • 85035197114 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Omitted end note
    • Omitted end note.
  • 17
    • 85035222538 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • the Schwarzschild case, it has been found 1 that (formula presented) diverges at the last stable circular orbit, due to the flattening of the effective potential well. Intuitively, one should expect the same behavior in Kerr as well
    • In the Schwarzschild case, it has been found 1 that (formula presented) diverges at the last stable circular orbit, due to the flattening of the effective potential well. Intuitively, one should expect the same behavior in Kerr as well.


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.