Strong shift equivalence of 2 × 2 matrices of non-negative integers

Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems

Volumn 3, Issue 4, 1983, Pages 501-508

  Baker, Kirby A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001588027     PISSN: 01433857     EISSN: 14694417     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0143385700002091     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. [1]Bondy J.A. & Murty U.S.R. Graph Theory with Applications. American Elsevier: New York, 1976.
2. [2]Borevich Z.I. & Shafarevich I.R. Number Theory. Academic Press: New York, 1966.
3. [3]Bowen R. Markov partitions for axiom-A diffeomorphisms, Amer. J. Math. 92 (1970), 725–747.
4. [4]Bowen R. Equilibrium States and the Ergodic Theory of Anosov Diffeomorphisms. Lecture Notes in Mathematics Vol. 470. Springer-Verlag; New York, 1975.
5. [5]Bowen R. & Lanford O. Zeta functions of restrictions of the shift transformation. In Proc. Symp. Pure Math. 14, pp. 43–50. Amer. Math. Soc.: Providence, R.I. 1970.
6. [6]Brocot A. Calcul des rouages par approximation. Paris, 1862
7. (referenced in: Dixon L.E., History of the Theory of Numbers, Vol. I, p. 156. Chelsea: New York, 1952).
8. [7]Cuntz J. & Krieger W. Topological Markov chains with dicyclic dimension groups.J. Reine Angew. Math. 320 (1980), 44–51.
9. [8]Denker M., Grillenberger C. & Sigmund K. Ergodic Theory on Compact Spaces. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, Vol. 527. Springer-Verlag: New York 1976.
10. [9]Effros E. Dimensions and C*-algebras, CBMS Regional Conference Series, No. 46. Amer. Math. Soc.: Providence, 1981.
11. [10]Effros E. On Williams' problem for positive matrices. Preprint, 1981.
12. [11]Effros E. & Shen C.-D., Approximately finite C*-algebras and continued fractions. Indiana J. Math. 29 (1980), 191–204.
13. [12]Gantmacher F.R. The Theory of Matrices, Vol.II. Chelsea Publ. Co.: New York, 1960.
14. [13]Handelman D. Positive matrices and dimension groups affiliated to C*-algebras and topological Markov chains, J. Operator Theory 6 (1981), 55–74.
15. [14]Handelman D. Strongly indecomposable abelian groups and totally ordered topological Markov chains. Preprint, 1981.
16. [15]Hardy G.H. & Wright E.M. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 4th.ed. Oxford U. Press: New York, 1960.
17. [16]Kim K.H. & Rousch F.W. Some results on decidability of shift equivalence, J. Combin. Inform. Systems Sci. 4 (1979), 123–146.
18. [17]Krieger W. On dimension functions and topological Markov chains, Invent. Math. 63 (1980), 239–250.
19. [18]Latimer C.G. & MacDuffee C.C.A correspondence between classes of ideals and classes of matrices. Ann. of Math. 34 (1933), 313–316.
20. [19]Morse M. & Hedlund G. Symbolic dynamics. Amer. J. Math. 60 (1938), 815–866.
21. [20]New man M. Integral Matrices. Academic Press: New York, 1972.
22. [21]Parry W. Intrinsic Markov chains. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 112 (1964), 55–66.
23. [22]Parry W. The classification of topological Markov chains. Adapted shift equivalence. Israel J. Math. 38 (1981), 335–344.
24. [23]Parry W. & Williams R.F. Block coding and a zeta function for finite Markov chains. Proc. London Math. Soc. 35 (1977), 484–495.
25. [24]Rademacher H. Lectures on Elementary Number Theory. Blaisdell: New York, 1964.
26. [25]Smale S. Differentiable dynamical systems. Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 73 (1967), 747–817.
27. [26]Taussky O. On a theorem of Latimer and McDuffee. Canad. J. Math. 1 (1949), 300–302.
28. [27]Williams R.F. Classification of one dimensional attractors. In Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. Vol. 14, pp. 341–361. Amer. Math. Soc.: Providence, 1970.
29. [28]Williams R.F. Classification of subshifts of finite type. Ann. of Math. 98 (1973), 120–153.
30. Errata, Ann. of Math. 99 (1974), 380–381.