Central policy and teacher response? scientific investigation in the national curriculum of england and wales

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 1995, Pages 471-480

  Jenkins, Edgar W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001584301     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0950069950170406     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AAAS (1964) Science: A Process Approach. A Commentary for Teachers (Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science).
2. Armstrong, H. E. (1903) The Teaching of Scientific Method and Other Papers on Education(London: Macmillan).
3. ASE (1993) The Place of Investigations in Science Education: A Report from the Investigations in Science Task Group (Hatfield: Association for Science Education).
4. Brock, W. H. (ed.) (1973) H. E. Armstrong and the Teaching of Scientific Method, 1880-1930(Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
5. Buchan, A. S. (1995) Realising a policy: inset provision for a problematic Attainment Target. British Journal of Inservice Education, 21 (1), 1-15.
6. Bybee, R. W. (ed.) (1985) Science, Technology, Society, Yearbook of the National Science Teachers’ Association (Washington, DC: NSTA).
7. Cross, R. T. and PRICE, R. F. (1992) Teaching Science for Social Responsibility (Sydney: St Louis Press).
8. DES/WO (1989) Science in the National Curriculum (London: HMSO).
9. DES/WO (1991) Science in the National Curriculum (London: HMSO).
10. Donnelly, J. F., Buchan, A. S., Jenkins, E. W. and Welford, A. G. (1993) Policy, Practice and Professional Judgement: School-based Assessment in Practical Science (Driffield: Studies in Education).
11. ESRC (1992) Realising Policy in Scl. Project Grant number R00 0233875 (Anne Buchan, Dr J. F. Donnelly, Professor E. W. Jenkins and A. G. Welford).
12. Halliwell, H. F. (1966) Aims and action in the classroom. Education in Chemistry, (3), 5.
13. Jenkins, E. W. (in press) When is a policy not a policy? School-based assessment of practical science at 16 +. International Journal of Science Education.
14. Laudan, L., Donovan, A., Laudan, R., Barker, P., Brown, H., Leplin, J., Thagard, P. and WYSTRA, S. (1986) Scientific change: philosophical models and historical research. Synthese, 69 (1), 142-223.
15. NEAB (1993) Science Framework: Guidance on the Assessment of Scl (Manchester: Northern Examinations and Assessment Board).
16. NCC (1989) Science; Non-statutory Guidance (London: National Curriculum Council).
17. Pimentel, G. C. (ed.) (1960) Chemistry: An Experimental Science (San Franscisco: Freeman).
18. Ravetz, J. R. (1989). Some ideas about science, relevant to education. In E. W. Jenkins (ed.), Policy Issues and School Science Education (Leeds: Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds).
19. SCAA (1994) Science in the National Curriculum: Draft Proposals (London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority).
20. SCREEN, P. (1986) Warwick Process Science (Southampton: Ashford Press).
21. SEAC (1992) School Assessment Folder(Part 3), Materials to Support the Assessment of Scl: Scientific Investigations. Science 1992 National Pilot (London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council).
22. SEAC (1993a) School Assessment Folder-Assessing Scl (London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council).
23. SEAC (1993b) Scientific Investigations and GCSEin’94 and’95, letter from Hilary Nichols to all Headteachers, dated 27 September 1993 (London: Schools Examination and Assessment Council).
24. TES (1993a) Pains of Change. Times Educational Supplement, 21 May.
25. TES (1993b) Times Educational Supplement, 14 April.
26. YAGER, R. E. (ed.) (1993) The Science, Technology, Society Movement (Washington, DC:NSTA).