Understanding multiple group identities: Inserting women into cultural transformations

Journal of Social Issues

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 299-327

  Hurtado, Aída ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Pan American University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001581840     PISSN: 00224537     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-4560.1997.tb02445.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Almaguer, T. (1991). Chicano men: A cartography of homosexual identity and behavior. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 3(2), 75-100.
2. Almaguer, T. (1974). Historical notes on Chicano oppression: The dialectics of racial and class domination in North America. Aztlán, 5(1-2), 27-56.
3. Alvarez, R. (1973). The psycho-historical and socioeconomic development of the Chicano community in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 53(4), 920-942.
4. Anzaldúa, G. 1990. La conciencia de la mestiza: Towards a new consciousness. In G. Anzaldúa (Ed.), Making face, making soul-haciendo caras: Creative and critical perspectives by women of Color (pp. 377-89). San Francisco: Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
5. Archer, J. (1996). Sex differences in social behavior: Are the social role and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51(9), 909-917.
6. Baca Zinn, M. (1995). Social science theorizing for Latino families in the age of diversity. In R. E. Zambrana (Ed.), Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy, and practice (pp. 177-189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
7. Baca Zinn, M. (1990). Family, feminism, and race in America. Gender and Society, 4(1), 68-82.
8. Blauner, R. (1972). Racial oppression in America. New York: Harper & Row.
9. Buss, D. M. (1995a). Evolutionary psychology: A new paradigm for psychological science. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 1-30.
10. Buss, D. M. (1995b). Psychological sex differences, origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50(3), 164-168.
11. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1-49.
12. Castillo, Ana. (1995). Massacre of the Dreamers: Essays on Xicanisma. New York: Plume.
13. Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought. New York: Routledge.
14. Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
15. Coontz, S. (1992). The way we never were: American families and the nostalgia trap. New York: Basic Books.
16. Crenshaw, K. (1993). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of anti-discrimination doctrine, feminist theory and anti-racist politics. In D. Kelly Weisberg (Ed.), Feminist legal theory: Foundations (pp. 383-95). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
17. Cuadraz, G. H. (1996). Experiences of multiple marginality: A case study of Chicana 'scholarship women.' In C. Turner, M. García, A. Nora & L. Rendón (Eds.), Racial and ethnic diversity in higher education. ASHE Reader Series (pp. 210-222). New York: Simon & Schuster Custom Publishing.
18. Cuadraz, G. H. & Pierce, J. (1994). From scholarship girls to scholarship women: Surviving the contra-dictions of class and race in academe. Explorations in Ethnic Studies 17(1), 1-23.
19. Dominguez, V. (1992). Invoking culture: The messy side of "cultural politics." The South Atlantic Quarterly, 91(1), 19-42.
20. Eagly, A. H. (1995). The science and politics of comparing women and men. American Psychologist, 50, 145-158.
21. Feldman, S., Mont-Reynaud, R., & Rosenthal, D. (1992). When East moves West: The acculturation of values of Chinese adolescents in the U.S. and Australia. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 2, 147-173.
22. Fine, M., Weis, L., Addelston, J., & Marusza, J. (1994). White Loss. Unpublished manuscript.
23. Franz, C. & Stewart, A. J. (Eds.). (1994). Women creating lives: Identities, resilience, & resistance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
24. Goldberger, N., Tarule, J., Clinchy, B. & Belenky, M. (Eds.). (1996). Knowledge, difference and power: Essays inspired by women's ways of knowing. New York: Basic Books.
25. Gordon, M. M. (1964). Assimilation in American life: The role of race, religion, and national origins. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Gould, S. J. (1996). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Harmony Books.
27. Gray, J. (1992). Men are from Mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communications and getting what you want in your relationships. New York: Harper Collins.
28. Gurin, P., Hurtado, A. & Peng, T. (1994). Group contacts and ethnicity in the social identities of Mexicanos and Chicanos. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 521-532.
29. Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminists Studies 4(3), 575-599.
30. Harris, A. P. (1990). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. Stanford Law Review 42, 581-616.
31. Hayes-Bautista, D., Hurtado, A., Valdez, R. B. & Hernández, A. C. R. (1991). No longera minority: Latinos and social policy in California. Los Angeles: UCLA Chicano Studies Research Center.
32. Hayes-Bautista, D. E., Schink, W. O., & Chapa, J. (1988). The burden of support: Young Latinos in an aging society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Herrnstein, R. J., & Murray, C. (1995). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: Free Press.
34. Hoggart, R. (1957). The uses of literacy. London: Chatto and Windus.
35. hooks, bell. (1989). Talking back: Thinking feminist, thinking black. Boston: South End Press.
36. Hurtado, A. (1996a). The color of privilege: Three blasphemies on feminism and race. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
37. Hurtado, A. (1996b). Strategic suspensions: Feminists of Color theorize the production of knowledge. In N. Goldberger, J. Tarule, B. Clinchy, & M. Belenky (Eds.), Knowledge, difference and power: Essays inspired by women's ways of knowing (pp. 372-392). New York: Basic Books.
38. Hurtado, A. (1995). Variations, combinations, and evolutions: Latino families in the United States. In Ruth E. Zambrana (Ed.), Understanding Latino families: Scholarship, policy, and practice (pp. 40-61). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
39. Hurtado, A. (1994). Community assessment: Starlight Elementary. Final report. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Santa Cruz.
40. Hurtado, A., Gurin, P., & Peng, T. (1994). Social identities - A framework for studying the adaptations of immigrants and ethnics: The adaptations of Mexicans in the United States. Social Problems, 41(1), 129-149.
41. Hurtado, A., Rodríguez, J., Gurin, P. & Beals, J. L. (1993). The impact of Mexican descendants' social identity on the ethnic socialization of children. In M. E. Bernai & G. P. Knight, (Eds.), Ethnic identity: Formation and transmission among Hispanics and other minorities (pp. 131-162). New York: SUNY Press.
42. Hurtado, A. & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Through the looking glass: Implications of studying whiteness for feminist methods. In M. Fine, L. Powell, L. Weis, & M. Wong (Eds.), Off White: Readings on society, race and culture (pp. 297-311). New York: Routledge.
43. Hyde, J. S. & Plant, E. A. (1995). Magnitude of psychological gender differences: Another side to the story. American Psychologist, 50(3), 159-161.
44. Jones, J. (1991). Psychological models of race: What have they been and what should they be? In J. Goodchilds (Ed.), Psychological perspectives in human diversity in America (pp. 3-46). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
45. Kimmel, Michael S. (1993). Invisible masculinity. Society, 30(6), 28-35.
46. Leaper, C. (1996). Predictors of Mexican-American mother's and father's attitudes toward gender equality. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 18(3), 343-355.
47. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts, selected papers on group dynamics 1935-1946. New York: Harper.
48. Marecek, J. (1995). Gender, politics, and psychology's ways of knowing. American Psychologist, 50(3), 162-163.
49. Matsuda, M. (1992). When the first quail calls: Multiple consciousness as jurisprudence method. Women's Rights Law Report, 14, 297-300.
50. Moraga, C. & Anzaldúa, G. (Eds.). (1981). This bridge called my back: Writings by radical women of Color. Watertown, MA: Persephone Press.
51. Morrison, T. (1992). Playing in the dark: Whiteness and the literary imagination. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
52. Newby, R. G. (1995). The bell curve: Laying bare the resurgence of scientific racism [Special issue]. American Behavioral Scientist, 39(1).
53. Park, R. E., & Burgess, E. W. (1921). Introduction to the Science of Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Pettigrew, T. F., & Martin, J. (1987). Shaping the organizational context for Black American inclusion. Journal of Social Issues, 43, 41-78.
55. Phinney, J. S. (1990). Ethnic identity in adolescents and adults: A review of research. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 499-514.
56. Phinney, J. S. (1996). When we talk about American ethnic groups, what do we mean? American Psychologist, 51(9), 918-927.
57. Podhoretz, N. (1967). Making it. New York: Random House.
58. Portes, A. & Rumbaut, R. G. (1990). Immigrant America: A portrait. Berkeley: University of California Press.
59. Preston, S. H. (1996). Children will pay. The New York Times Magazine, 96-97.
60. Reid, P. (1994, August). Gender and class identities: African Americans in context. Paper presented at the American Psychological Association Annual Convention, Los Angeles.
61. Rendón, L. I. (1992). From the barrio to the academy: Revelations of a Mexican American 'scholarship girl.' New Directions in Community Colleges, 90 (Winter), 55-64.
62. Redfield, R., Linton, R., & Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. American Anthropologist, 38(1), 149-152.
63. Rodriguez, R. (1982). Hunger of memory. Boston: David R. Godine Publishers.
64. Rodriguez-Scheel, J. (1980). An investigation of the components of social identity for a Detroit sample. Unpublished manuscript, Occidental College, Psychology Department, Los Angeles, CA.
65. Sandoval, C. (in press). Mestisaje as differential methodology: Feminists-of-Color/sliding the rule of the canon. In C. Trujillo (Ed.), Living Chicana theory. Berkeley, CA: Third Woman Press.
66. Sandoval, C. (1991). U.S. third world feminism: The theory and method of oppositional consciousness in the postmodern world. Genders, 10 (Spring), 1-24.
67. Schulberg, B. (1952). What makes Sammy run? New York: The Modern Library.
68. Smith, D. E. (1987). Women's inequality and the family. In N. Gerstel & H. E. Gross (Eds.), Families and work (pp. 23-54). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
69. Smuts, B. (1995). The evolutionary origins of patriarchy. Human Nature, 3, 1-32.
70. Staples, R. & Mirandé, A. 1980. Racial and cultural variations among American families: A decennial review of the literature on minority families. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 42(4), 887-903.
71. Stephenson, J. (1991). Men are not cost-effective: Male crime in America. Napa, CA: Diemer, Smith Publishing Company.
72. Stewart, A. J. (1994). Toward a feminist strategy for studying women's lives. In C. Franz & A. J. Stewart (Eds.), Women creating lives (pp. 273-288). Boulder, CO: Westview.
73. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books.
74. Tavris, C. (1992). The mismeasure of woman. New York: Simon & Schuster.
75. Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. London: Cambridge University Press.
76. West, C. (1995). Women's competence in conversation. Discourse and Society 6(1), 107-131.
77. Zavella, P. (1987). Women's work and Chicano families: Cannery workers of the Santa Clara Valley. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
78. Zuckerman, M. (1990). Some dubious premises in research and theory on racial differences. American Psychologist, 45, 1297-1303.