Users' experience of information retrieval systems: An exploration of the relationship between search experience and affective measures

Library and Information Science Research

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 1992, Pages 167-181

  Dalrymple, Prudence Ward ^a   Zweizig, Douglas L ^b  

^a American Library Association   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001575767     PISSN: 07408188     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allen, Sheilah, & Matheson, Joyce. (1977). Development of a semantic differential to assess users' attitudes toward a batch mode information retrieval system (ERIC). Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 28, 268-272.
2. Auster, Ethel. (1983). User satisfaction with the online negotiation interview: Contemporary concern and traditional perspective. RQ, 23, 47-59.
3. Bellardo, Trudi. (1985). An investigation of online search traits and their relationship to search outcome. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36, 241-250.
4. Borgman, Christine L. (1989). All users of information retrieval systems are not created equal: An exploration into individual differences. Information Processing & Management, 25, 237-251.
5. Cochrane, Pauline A., & Markey, Karen. (1983). Catalog use studies-Since the introduction of online interactive catalogs: Impact on design for subject access. Library & Information Science Research, 5, 337-363.
6. Dalrymple, Prudence W. (1990). Retrieval by reformulation in two university library catalogs: Toward a cognitive model of searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41, 272-281.
7. Dalrymple, Prudence Ward. (1987). Retrieval by reformulation in two university library catalogs: Toward a cognitive model of searching behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
8. Fenichel, Carol Hansen. (1981). Online searching: Measures that discriminate among users with different types of experience. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 23-32.
9. Fidel, Raya. (1985). Moves in online searching. Online Review, 9, 61-74.
10. Fine, Sara. (1984). The psychology of information use. Library Trends, 32, 441-460.
11. Katzer, Jeffrey. (1972). The development of a semantic differential to assess users' attitudes towards an on-line interactive reference retrieval system. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 23, 122-128.
12. Nielsen, Brian. (1986). What they say they do and what they do: Assessing online catalog use instruction through transaction monitoring. Information Technology and Libraries, 5, 28-34.
13. Peters, Thomas A. (1989). When smart people fail: An analysis of the transaction log of an online public access catalog. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 15, 267-273.
14. Saracevic, Tefko. (1975). Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 26, 321-343.
15. Saracevic, Tefko, & Kantor, Paul. (1988a). A study of information seeking and retrieving: II. Users, questions, and effectiveness. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 177-196.
16. Saracevic, Tefko, & Kantor, Paul. (1988b). A study of information seeking and retrieving: III. Searchers, searches, and overlap. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 197-216.
17. Saracevic, Tefko, Kantor, Paul, Chamis, Alice Y., & Trivison, Donna. (1988). A study of information seeking and retrieving: I. Background and methodology. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 39, 161-176.
18. Swanson, Don R. (1964). Dialogues with a catalogue. Library Quarterly, 34, 113-125.
19. Tagliacozzo, Renata, & Kochen, Manfred. (1970). Information-seeking behavior of catalog users. Information Storage and Retrieval, 6, 363-381.
20. Tessier, Judith A., Crouch, Wayne W., & Atherton, Pauline. (1977). New measures of user satisfaction with computer-based literature searches. Special Libraries, 68, 383-389.
21. Williams, Michael D. (1984). What makes RABBIT run? International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 21, 333-352.
22. Williams, Michael D., & Hollan, James D. (1981). The process of retrieval from very longterm memory. Cognitive Science, 5, 87-119.