Experimental implications of large CP violation and final state interactions in the search for D0 - D̄0 mixing

Physics Letters, Section B: Nuclear, Elementary Particle and High-Energy Physics

Volumn 383, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 475-481

  Browder, T E ^a   Pakvasa, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001558968     PISSN: 03702693     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/0370-2693(96)00776-9     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. G. Blaylock, A. Seiden and Y. Nir, Phys. Lett. B 355 (1995) 555.
2. J.C. Anjos et al. (E691 Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988) 1239.
3. M.V. Purohit (E791 Collaboration), Contributions to the Proceedings of ICHEP94 Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, (IOP Publishing, 1995) p. 479. Also see invited talk by P. Checchia, Proceedings of the PISA Heavy Flavors Conference.
4. M.V. Purohit (E791 Collaboration), Contributions to the Proceedings of ICHEP94 Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, (IOP Publishing, 1995) p. 479. Also see invited talk by P. Checchia, Proceedings of the PISA Heavy Flavors Conference.
5. T. Liu, Harvard preprint HUTP-94/E021, and Proceedings of the Charm 2000 Workshop, Fermilab Conf 94-190, p. 375.
6. T. Liu, Ph.D. Thesis, Harvard University 1995 (unpublished).
7. I.I. Bigi, Proceedings of the XXIII International Conference on High Energy Physics, ed. S.C. Loken, Singapore (World Scientific, 1986) p. 857.
8. T.E. Browder, Ph.D. Thesis, UCSB-HEP-88-4 (1988).
9. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Lett. B 164 (1985) 170.
10. J. Donoghue, E. Golowich, B. Holstein, and J. Trampetic, Phys. Rev. D 33 (1986) 179.
11. D. Cinabro et al. (CLEO Collaboration), Phys. Rev. Lett. 72 (1988) 1406.
12. L.L. Chau and H.Y. Cheng, Phys. Lett. B 333 (1994) 514.
13. F. Buccella, M. Lusignoli, G. Miele, A. Pugliese and P. Santorelli, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 3478; and private communication.
14. T. Kaeding and I. Hinchcliffe, LBL-37224 and UCB-PTH 95/14; T. Kaeding, private communication. They find δ = 20° from a fit to experimental branching fraction measurements, with large uncertainties; A.N. Kamal, finds δ = 11°, private communication.
15. T. Kaeding and I. Hinchcliffe, LBL-37224 and UCB-PTH 95/14; T. Kaeding, private communication. They find δ = 20° from a fit to experimental branching fraction measurements, with large uncertainties; A.N. Kamal, finds δ = 11°, private communication.
16. T. Kaeding and I. Hinchcliffe, LBL-37224 and UCB-PTH 95/14; T. Kaeding, private communication. They find δ = 20° from a fit to experimental branching fraction measurements, with large uncertainties; A.N. Kamal, finds δ = 11°, private communication.
17. G. Burdman, E. Golowich, J. Hewett and S. Pakvasa, UH-511-830-95; E. Ma, W.A. Simmons and S.F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2888; L-L. Chau, W-Y. Keung and M.D. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2145.
18. G. Burdman, E. Golowich, J. Hewett and S. Pakvasa, UH-511-830-95; E. Ma, W.A. Simmons and S.F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2888; L-L. Chau, W-Y. Keung and M.D. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2145.
19. G. Burdman, E. Golowich, J. Hewett and S. Pakvasa, UH-511-830-95; E. Ma, W.A. Simmons and S.F. Tuan, Phys. Rev. D 20 (1979) 2888; L-L. Chau, W-Y. Keung and M.D. Tran, Phys. Rev. D 27 (1983) 2145.
20. L. Wolfenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 2460.
21. G. Branco et al., Phys. Lett. B. 372 (1996) 311.