Separate versus combined analysis of phylogenetic evidence

Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 1995, Pages 657-681

  De Queiroz, Alan ^a,c   Donoghue, Michael J ^b   Kim, Junhyong ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^d YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Character congruence; Consensus; Phylogeny; Taxonomic congruence; Total evidence

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001546577     PISSN: 00664162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.003301     Document Type: Article

References (117)

1. Adams EN. 1972. Consensus techniques and the comparison of taxonomic trees. Syst. Zool. 21:390-97
2. Alroy J. 1995. Continuous track analysis: a new phylogenetic and biogeographic method. Syst. Biol. 44: 152-78
3. Avise JC, Shapira IF, Daniel SW, Aquadro CF, Lansman RA. 1983. Mitochondrial DNA differentiation during the speciation process in Peromyscus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1:38-56
4. Bandelt HT, Dress AWM. 1989. Weak hierarchies associated with similarity measures - an additive clustering technique. Bull. Math. Biol. 51:133-66
5. Barrett M, Donoghue MJ, Sober E. 1991. Against consensus. Syst. Zool. 40:486-93
6. Barrett M, Donoghue MJ, Sober E. 1993. Crusade? A response to Nelson. Syst. Biol. 42:216-17
7. Baum BR. 1992. Combining trees as a way of combining data sets for phylogenetic inference, and the desirability of combining gene trees. Taxon 41:3-10
8. Bremer K. 1990. Combinable component consensus. Cladistics 6:369-72
9. Brooks DR, McLennan DA. 1991. Phytogeny, Ecology, and Behavior. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
10. Bull JJ, Huelsenbeck JP, Cunningham CW, Swofford DL, Waddell PJ. 1993. Partitioning and combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 42:384-97
11. Cao Y, Adachi J, Janke A, Paabo S, Hasegawa M. 1994. Phylogenetic relationships among Eutherian orders estimated from inferred sequences of mitochondrial proteins: instability of a tree based on a single gene. J. Mol. Evol. 39:519-27
12. Carnap, R. 1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
13. Carpenter JM. 1988. Choosing among multiple equally parsimonious cladograms. Cladistics 4:291-96
14. Chippindale PT, Wiens JJ. 1994. Weighting, partitioning, and combining characters in phylogenetic analysis. Syst. Biol. 43:278-87
15. Clark JB, Maddison WP, Kidwell MG. 1994. Phylogenetic analysis supports horizontal transfer of P transposable elements. Mol. Biol. Evol. 11:40-50
16. Cracraft J, Helm-Bychowski K. 1991. Parsimony and phylogenetic inference using DNA sequences: some methodological strategies. See Ref. 71, pp. 184-220
17. Cracraft J, Mindell DP. 1989. The early history of modern birds: a comparison of molecular and morphological evidence. See Ref. 38, pp. 389-403
18. Deleporte P. 1993. Characters, attributes and tests of evolutionary scenarios. Cladistics 9:427-32
19. de Queiroz A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst. Biol. 42:368-72
20. de Queiroz A, Lawson R. 1994. Phy-logenetic relationships of the garter snakes based on DNA sequence and allozyme variation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 53:209-29
21. de Queiroz A, Wimberger PH. 1993. The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution. 47:46-60
22. de Queiroz A, Wimberger PH. 1995. Comparisons of behavioral and morphological characters as indicators of phytogeny. In Phylogenies and the Comparative Method in Animal Behavior, ed. E Martins. New York Oxford Univ. Press. In press
23. de Queiroz K, Gambier J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-80
24. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA, Gauthier J, Kluge AG, Rowe T. 1989. The importance of fossils in phylogeny reconstruction. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:431-60
25. Donoghue MJ, Maddison WP. 1986. Polarity assessment in phylogenetic systematics: a response to Meacham. Taxon 35:534-38
26. Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ. 1992. The suitability of molecular and morphological evidence in reconstructing plant phylogeny. See Ref. 102, pp. 340-68
27. Donoghue MJ, Sanderson MJ. 1994. Complexity and homology in plants. In Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology, ed. B Hall, pp. 393-421. San Diego: Academic
28. Doyle JA, Donoghue MJ, Zimmer EA. 1994. Integration of morphological and rRNA data on the origin of angiosperms. Ann. Mo. Bol. Gard. 81:419-50
29. Doyle JJ. 1992. Gene trees and species trees: molecular systematics as one-character taxonomy. Syst. Bot. 17:144-63
30. Eernisse DJ, Kluge AG. 1993. Taxonomic congruence versus total evidence, and amniote phylogeny inferred from fossils, molecules and morphology. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1170-95
31. Faith DP. 1991. Cladistic permutation tests for monophyly and nonmonophyly. Syst. Zool. 40:366-75
32. Farris JS. 1977. Phylogenetic analysis under Dollo's law. Syst. Zool. 26:77-88
33. Farris JS. 1979. The information content of the phylogenetic system. Syst. Zool. 28:483-519
34. Farris JS. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. In Advances in Cladistics, ed. NI Platnick, VA Funk, 2:7-36. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
35. Felsenstein J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony or compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-10
36. Felsenstein J. 1981. A likelihood approach to character weighting and what it tells us about parsimony and compatibility. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 16:183-96
37. Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783-91
38. Fernholm B, Bremer K, Jornvall H. 1989. The Hierarchy of Life: Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis. Amsterdam: Elsevier
39. Funk VA. 1985. Phylogenetic patterns and hybridization. Ann. Mo. Bot. Gard. 72:681-715
40. Goloboff PA. 1993. Estimating character weights during tree search. Cladistics 9:83-91
41. Good IJ. 1983. Good Thinking: The Foundations of Probability and its Applications. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
42. Graybeal A. 1994. Evaluating the phylogenetic utility of genes: a search for genes informative about deep divergences among vertebrates. Syst. Biol. 43:174-93
43. Hempel CG. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: Free Press
44. Hennig W. 1966. Phylogenetic Systematics. Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
45. Hillis DM. 1987. Molecular versus morphological approaches to systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:23-42
46. Hoch PC, Stephenson AG, ed. 1995. Experimental and Molecular Approaches to Plant Biosystematics. St. Louis: Monogr. Syst., Mo. Bot. Gard.
47. Huelsenbeck JP. 1991. When are fossils better than extant taxa in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Zool. 40:458-69
48. Huelsenbeck JP, Hillis DM. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-64
49. Huelsenbeck JP, Swofford DL, Cunningham CW, Bull JJ, Waddell PJ. 1994. Is character weighting a panacea for the problem of data heterogeneity in phylogenetic analysis? Syst. Biol. 43:288-91
50. Jones TR, Kluge AG, Wolf AJ. 1993. When theories and methodologies clash: a phylogenetic reanalysis of the North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Biol. 42:92-102
51. Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism, ed. HN Munro, pp. 21-132. New York: Academic
52. Kidwell MG. 1993. Lateral transfer in natural populations of eukaryotes. Annu. Rev. Genet. 27:235-56
53. Kimura M. 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rate of base substitution through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J. Mol. Evol. 16: 111-20
54. Kluge AG. 1983. Cladistics and the classification of the great apes. In New Interpretations of Ape and Human Ancestry, ed. RL Ciochon, RS Corruccini, pp. 151-77. New York: Plenum
55. Kluge AG. 1984. The relevance of parsimony to phylogenetic inference. In Cladistics: Perspectives on the Reconstruction of Evolutionary History, ed. T Duncan, TF Stuessy, pp. 24-38. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
56. Kluge AG. 1989. A concern for evidence and a phylogenetic hypothesis of relationships among Epicrates (Boidae, Serpentes). Syst. Zool. 38:7-25
57. Kluge AG, Wolf AJ. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-99
58. Lanyon SM. 1993. Phylogenetic frame-works: towards a firmer foundation for the comparative approach. Biol J. Linn. Soc. 49:45-61
59. Larson A. 1991. Evolutionary analysis of length variable sequences: divergent domains of ribosomal DNA. See Ref. 71, pp. 221-48
60. Larson A. 1994. The comparison of morphological and molecular data in phylogenetic systematics. In Molecular Ecology and Evolution: Approaches and Applications, ed. B Schierwater, B Streit, GP Wagner, R DeSalle, pp. 371-90. Basel, Switzerland: Birkhauser Verlag
61. Li W-H, Graur D. 1991. Fundamentals of Molecular Evolution. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer
62. Maddison WP. 1989. Reconstructing character evolution on polytomous cladograms. Cladistics 5:365-77
63. Maddison WP. 1995. The growth of phylogenetic biology. In Molecular Approaches to Zoology and Evolution, ed. J Ferraris. New York: Wiley In press
64. Maddison WP. 1995. Phylogenetic histories within and among species. See Ref. 46, pp. 273-87
65. Maddison WP, Maddison DR. 1992. MacClade: Interactive Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution, Version 3.0. Sunderland, Mass: Sinauer
66. McDade LA. 1992. Hybrids and phylogenetic systematics. II. The impact of hybrids on cladistic analysis. Evolution 46:1329-46
67. Meacham CA. 1986. More about directed characters: a reply to Donoghue and Maddison. Taxon 35:538-40
68. Mickevich MF. 1978. Taxonomic congruence. Syst. Zool. 27:143-58
69. Mickevich MF, Farris JS. 1981. The implications of congruence in Menidia. Syst. Tool. 30:351-70
70. Miyamoto MM. 1985. Consensus cladograms and general classifications. Cladistics 1:186-89
71. Miyamoto MM, Cracraft J, ed. 1991. Phylogenetic Analysis of DNA Sequences. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
72. Miyamoto MM, Fitch WM. 1995. Testing species phylogenies and phylogenetic methods with congruence. Syst. Biol. 44:64-76
73. Moritz C, Dowling TE, Brown WM. 1987. Evolution of animal mitochondrial DNA: relevance for population biology and systematics. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 18:269-92
74. Nei M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
75. Nelson G. 1979. Cladistic analysis and synthesis: principles and definitions, with a historical note on Adanson's Familles Des Plantes (1763-1764). Syst. Zool. 28:1-21
76. Nelson G. 1993. Why crusade against consensus? A reply to Barrett, Donoghue, and Sober. Syst. Biol. 42:215-16
77. Nelson G, Platnick NI. 1981. Systematics and Biogeography: Cladistics and Vicariance. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
78. Novacek MJ. 1992. Fossils as critical data for phylogeny. In Extinction and Phylogeny, ed MJ Novacek, QD Wheeler, pp. 46-88. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
79. Olmstead RG, Sweere JA. 1994. Combining data in phylogenetic systematics: an empirical approach using three molecular data sets in the Solanaceae. Syst. Biol. 43:467-81
80. Page RDM. 1988. Quantitative cladistic biogeography: constructing and comparing area cladograms. Syst. Zool. 37:254-70
81. Page RDM. 1989. Comments on component-compatibility in historical biogeography. Cladistics 5:167-82
82. Page RDM. 1994. Maps between trees and cladistic analysis of historical associations among genes, organisms, and areas. Syst. Biol. 43:58-77
83. Pamilo P, Nei M. 1988. Relationships between gene trees and species trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 5:568-83
84. Patterson C, ed. 1987. Molecules and Morphology in Evolution: Conflict or Compromise? Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press
85. Patterson C, Williams DM, Humphries CJ. 1993. Congruence between molecular and morphological phylogenies. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:153-88
86. Penny D, Foulds LR, Hendy MD. 1982. Testing the theory of evolution by comparing phylogenetic trees constructed from five different protein sequences. Nature 297:197-200
87. Penny D, Hendy MD. 1986. Estimating the reliability of evolutionary trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 3:403-17
88. Popper KR. 1965. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. New York: Harper & Row
89. Popper KR. 1968. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York: Harper & Row
90. Purvis A. 1995. A modification to Baum and Ragan's method for combining phylogenetic trees. Syst. Biol. 44:251-55
91. Ragan MA. 1992. Phylogenetic inference based on matrix representation of trees. Mol. Phylog. Evol. 1:53-58
92. Rieseberg LH, Brunsfeld S. 1992. Molecular evidence and plant introgression. See Ref. 102, pp. 151-76
93. Rieseberg LH, Morefield JD. 1995. Character expression, phylogenetic reconstruction, and the detection of reticulate evolution. See Ref. 46, pp. 333-53
94. Rieseberg LH, Soltis DE. 1991. Phylogenetic consequences of cytoplasmic gene flow in plants. Evol. Trends Plants 5:65-84
95. Rodrigo AG, Kelly-Borges M, Bergquist PR, Bergquist PL. 1993. A randomization test of the null hypothesis that two cladograms are sample estimates of a parametric phylogenetic tree. NZ J. Bot. 31:257-68
96. Rosen DE. 1978. Vicariant patterns and historical biogeography. Syst. Zool. 27: 159-88
97. Sanderson MJ, Donoghue MJ. 1989. Patterns of variation in levels of homoplasy. Evolution 43:1781-95
98. Shaffer HB, Clark JM, Kraus F. 1991. When molecules and morphology clash: a phylogenetic analysis of North American ambystomatid salamanders (Caudata: Ambystomatidae). Syst. Zool. 40: 284-303
99. Sheldon FH, Bledsoe AH. 1993. Avian molecular systematics, 1970s to 1990s. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:243-78
100. Sibley CG, Ahlquist JE. 1987. Avian phylogeny reconstructed from comparisons of the genetic material, DNA. See Ref. 84, pp. 95-121
101. Simberloff D. 1987. Calculating probabilities that cladograms match: a method of biogeographic inference. Syst. Zool. 36:175-95
102. Smith MW, Feng D-F, Doolittle RF. 1992. Evolution by acquisition: the case for horizontal gene transfers. Trends Biochem. Sci. 17:489-93
103. Sober E. 1988. Reconstructing the Past: Parsimony, Evolution, and Inference. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press
104. Soltis PS, Soltis DE, Doyle JJ, ed. 1992. Molecular Systematics in Plants. New York: Chapman & Hall
105. Stebbins GL. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia Univ. Press
106. Steel MA, Szekely LA, Hendy MD. 1994. Reconstructing trees when sequence sites evolve at variable rates. J. Comp. Biol. 1:153-63.
107. Swofford DL. 1991. When are phylogeny estimates from molecular and morphological data incongruent? See Ref. 71, pp. 295-333
108. Swofford DL. 1993. PAUP: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1. Champaign: Illinois Nat. Hist. Surv.
109. Swofford DL. 1994. Inferring phylogenies from combined data. Look before you leap. Presented at Annu. Meet. Soc. Syst. Biol., Athens, Georgia
110. Sytsma KJ. 1990. DNA and morphology, inference of plant phylogeny. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5:104-10
111. Tajima F. 1983. Evolutionary relationships of DNA sequences in finite populations. Genetics 105:437-60
112. Wagner WH. 1980. Origin and philosophy of the groundplan-divergence method of cladistics. Syst. Bot. 5:173-93
113. Wheeler WC. 1990. Nucleic acid sequence phylogeny and random out-groups. Cladistics 6:363-67
114. Wheeler WC. 1991. Congruence among data sets: a Bayesian approach. See Ref. 71, pp. 334-46
115. Wiley EO. 1987. Methods in vicariance biogeography. In Systematics and Evolution: A Matter of Diversity, ed. P Hovenkamp, pp. 283-306. Utrecht: Inst. Syst. Bot.
116. Wu C-I. 1991. Inferences of species phylogeny in relation to segregation of ancient polymorphisms. Genetics 127: 429-35
117. Zandee M, Roos MC. 1987. Component-compatibility in historical biogeography. Cladistics 3:305-32