-
4
-
-
17044399296
-
-
G. T. Alfieri, E. Banks, K. Kanematsu, and T. Ohoyama, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 23, 507 (1967).
-
(1967)
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
, vol.23
, pp. 507
-
-
Alfieri, G.T.1
Banks, E.2
Kanematsu, K.3
Ohoyama, T.4
-
7
-
-
0003451525
-
-
Suppl. B-I
-
H. J. Williams, J. H. Wernick, E. A. Nesbitt, and R. C. Sherwood, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 17, Suppl. B-I 91 (1962).
-
(1962)
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn.
, vol.17
, pp. 91
-
-
Williams, H.J.1
Wernick, J.H.2
Nesbitt, E.A.3
Sherwood, R.C.4
-
10
-
-
0542393856
-
-
N. Kaplan, E. Dormann, K. H. J. Buschow, and D. Lebenbaum, Phys. Rev. B 7, 40 (1973).
-
(1973)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.7
, pp. 40
-
-
Kaplan, N.1
Dormann, E.2
Buschow, K.H.J.3
Lebenbaum, D.4
-
11
-
-
0020227975
-
-
J. X. Boucherle, D. Givord, and J. Schweizer, J. Phys. (Paris), Colloq. 43, C7-199 (1982).
-
(1982)
J. Phys. (Paris), Colloq.
, vol.43
, pp. 199
-
-
Boucherle, J.X.1
Givord, D.2
Schweizer, J.3
-
16
-
-
0018334978
-
-
E. Belorizky, J. J. Niez, J. X. Boucherle, J. Schweizer, and P. M. Levy, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 15-18, 303 (1980).
-
(1980)
J. Magn. Magn. Mater.
, vol.15-18
, pp. 303
-
-
Belorizky, E.1
Niez, J.J.2
Boucherle, J.X.3
Schweizer, J.4
Levy, P.M.5
-
18
-
-
85037920459
-
-
The conduction-electron polarization parameter (Formula presented) for SmCd was estimated before by Stewart et al. (Ref. 5) to be -0.04, a considerably different value from ours, through the analysis of the susceptibility neglecting the crystal fields and the thermal populations of the excited J multiplets. The discrepancy even of the sign may be due to the fact that the formula of the effective Curie constant they used in determining the value is in a perfect square form with respect to (Formula presented) They might take the other solution.
-
The conduction-electron polarization parameter (Formula presented) for SmCd was estimated before by Stewart et al. (Ref. 5) to be -0.04, a considerably different value from ours, through the analysis of the susceptibility neglecting the crystal fields and the thermal populations of the excited J multiplets. The discrepancy even of the sign may be due to the fact that the formula of the effective Curie constant they used in determining the value is in a perfect square form with respect to (Formula presented) They might take the other solution.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
15844388076
-
-
No. 10 (New York Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, AIP C. D. Craham and J. J. Rhyne
-
R. M. Moon and W. C. Koehler, in Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, edited by C. D. Craham and J. J. Rhyne, AIP Conf. Proc. No. 10 (AIP, New York, 1972), p. 1314.
-
(1972)
AIP Conf. Proc.
, pp. 1314
-
-
Moon, R.M.1
Koehler, W.C.2
-
21
-
-
0000561458
-
-
H. Adachi, H. Ino, A. Koizumi, N. Sakai, Y. Tanaka, and H. Kawata, Phys. Rev. B 56, R5744 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.56
, pp. R5744
-
-
Adachi, H.1
Ino, H.2
Koizumi, A.3
Sakai, N.4
Tanaka, Y.5
Kawata, H.6
-
22
-
-
0019537840
-
-
J. X. Boucherle, D. Givord, A. Gregory, and J. Schweizer, J. Appl. Phys. 53, 1950 (1982).
-
(1982)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.53
, pp. 1950
-
-
Boucherle, J.X.1
Givord, D.2
Gregory, A.3
Schweizer, J.4
|