Is the extent of the proliferation of component cell lineages critical during organ morphogenesis?

Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 1996, Pages 849-856

  Szymkowiak, Eugene ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

Cell interactions; Lineage; Meristem; Morphogenesis; Periclinal chimera

Indexed keywords

EMBRYOPHYTA;

EID: 0001507349     PISSN: 10849521     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/scdb.1996.0104     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Szymkowiak EJ, Sussex IM (1996) What chimeras can tell us about plant development. Annu Rev Plant Physiol. Plant Mol Biol 47:351-376
2. Tilney-Bassett RAE (1986) Plant Chimeras. Edward Arnold Ltd, London
3. Marcotrigiano M (1990) Genetic mosaics and chimeras: Implications in biotechnology, in Biotechnology in Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 11, Somaclonal Variation and Crop Improvement I. (Bajaj YPS, ed.), pp 85-111. Springer, Berlin
4. Dawe RK, Freeling M (1991) Cell lineage and its consequences in higher plants. Plant J 1:3-8
5. Poethig RS (1989) Genetic mosaics and cell lineage patterns in plant development. Trends Genet 5:273-277
6. Sussex IM (1989) Developmental programming of the shoot meristem. Cell 56:225-229
7. Satina S, Blakeslee AF, Avery AG (1940) Demonstration of the three germ layers in the shoot apex of Datura by means of induced polyploidy in periclinal chimeras. Am J Bot 27:895-905
8. Ruth JE, Klekowski EJ, Stein OL (1985) Impermanent initials of the shoot apex and diplontic selection in a juniper chimera. Am J Bot 72:1127-1135
9. Stewart RN, Dermen H (1970) Determination of number and mitotic activity of shoot apical initial cells by analysis of mericlinal chimeras. Am J Bot 61:54-67
10. Blakeslee AF, Avery AG (1937) Methods of inducing doubling of chromosomes in plants. J Hered 28:393-411
11. Satina S, Blakeslee AF (1941) Periclinal chimeras in Datura stramonium in relation to development of leaf and flower. Am J Bot 28:862-871
12. Satina S, Blakeslee AF (1943) Periclinal chimeras in Datura in relation to the development of the carpel. Am J Bot 30:453-462
13. Satina S (1944) Periclinal chimeras in Datura in relation to development and structure (a) of the style and stigmas (b) of calyx and corolla. Am J Bot 31:493-502
14. Satina S (1945) Periclinal chimeras in Datura in relation to the development and structure of the ovule. Am J Bot 32:72-81
15. Dermen H (1947) Histogenesis of some bud sports and variegations. Proc Am Soc Hort Sci 50:51-73
16. Stewart RN, Burk LG (1970) Independence of tissue derived from apical layers in ontogeny of the tobacco leaf and ovary. Am J Bot 57:1010-1016
17. Stewart RN, Derman H (1975) Flexibility in ontogeny as shown by the contribution of the shoot apical layers to leaves of periclinal chimeras. Am J Bot 62:935-947
18. Stewart RN, Dermen H (1979) Ontogeny in monocotyledons as revealed by studies of the developmental an atomy of periclinal chloroplast chimeras. Am J Bot 66:47-58
19. Klekowski EL, Lowenfeld R, Klekowski EH (1996) Mangrove genetics. IV. Postzygotic mutations fixed as periclinal chimeras. Int J Plant Sci 157:398-405
20. Stewart RN, Semeniuk P, Derman H (1974) Competition and accommodation between apical layers and their derivatives in the ontogeny of chimeral shoots of Pelargonium X: horteum. Am J Bot 61:54-67
21. Poethig RS (1987) Clonal analysis of cell lineage patterns in plant development. Am J Bot 74:581-594
22. Poethig RS, Sussex IM (1985) The developmental morphology and growth dynamics of the tobacco leaf. Planta 165:158-169
23. Poethig RS, Sussex IM (1985) The cellular parameters of leaf development in tobacco: a clonal analysis. Planta 165:170-184
24. Szymkowiak EJ, Sussex IM (1992) The internal layer (L3) determines floral meristem size and carpel number in tomato periclinal chimeras. Plant Cell 4:1089-1100
25. Marcotrigiano M, Bernatzky R (1995) Arrangement of cell layers in the shoot apical meristems of periclinal chimeras influences cell fate. Plant J 7:193-202
26. Dudley M, Poethig RS (1991) The effect of a heterochronic mutation. Teopod2, on the cell lineage of the maize shoot. Development 111:733-739
27. Dudley M, Poethig RS (1993) The heterochronic Teopod1 and Teopod2 mutations of maize are expressed non-cell-autonomously. Genetics 133:389-399
28. Hake S, Freeling M (1986) Analysis of genetic mosaics shows that the extra epidermal cell divisions in Knotted mutant maize plants are induced by adjacent mesophyll cells. Nature 320:621-623
29. Sinha N, Hake S (1990) Mutant characters of Knotted maize leaves are determined in the innermost tissue layers. Dev Biol 141:203-210
30. Hake S, Vollbrecht E, Freeling M (1989) Cloning Knotted, the dominant morphological mutant in maize using Ds2 as a transposon tag. EMBO J 8:15-22
31. Jackson D, Veit B, Hake S (1994) Expression of maize Knotted1 related homeobox genes in the shoot apical meristem predicts patterns of morphogenesis in the vegetative shoot. Development 120:405-413
32. Carpenter R, Coen ES (1995) Transposon induced chimeras shown that floricaula, a meristem identity gene, acts non-autonomously between cell layers. Development 121:19-26
33. Hantke SS, Carpenter R, Coen ES (1995) Expression of floricaula in single cell layers of periclinal chimeras activates downstream homeotic genes in all layers of floral meristems. Development 121:27-35