The other side of multidisciplinary design optimization: Accomodating a multiobjective, uncertain and non-deterministic world

Engineering Optimization

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 161-189

  Lewis, Kemper ^a   Mistree, Farrokh ^b  

^a the State University of New York   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Approximation; Decomposition; Design; Multidiscipline; Optimization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001498818     PISSN: 0305215X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03052159808941369     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Aubin, J. P. (1979). Mathematical Methods of Game and Economic Theory, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam.
2. Azarm, S. and Li, W. C. (1987). Optimal design using a two-level monotonicity-based decomposition method. In Rao, S. S. (Ed.), Advances in Design Automation, DE 10(1), ASME, New York, 41-48.
3. Azarm, S. and Li, W. C. (1995). Optimality and constrained derivatives in two-level design optimization, Transactions of ASME, Journal of Mechanical Design, 112(4), 563-568.
4. Badhrinath, K. and Rao, J. R. J. (1995). Illustration of bilevel models in concurrent design modeling. In Azarm, S., Dutta, D., Eschenauer, H., Gilmore, B. J. and McCarthy, M. Y. (Eds.), Advances in Design Automation, DE 82(2), ASME, New York, 189-195.
5. Badhrinath, K. and Rao, J. R. J. (1996). Modeling for concurrent design using game theory formulations, Concurrent Engineering: Research and Applications, 4, 389-399.
6. Balling, R. J. (1993). How to optimize reinforced concrete systems, ASCE Structures Congress XI, Irvine, CA, pp. 1614-1619.
7. Balling, R. J. and Sobieski, J. (1994). Optimization of coupled systems: A critical overview of approaches, 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, FL, pp. 753-773.
8. Balling, R. J. and Sobieski, J. (1994). An algorithm for solving the system-level problem in multilevel optimization, 5th AIAA/USAF/NASA/ISSMO Symposium on Recent Advances in Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Panama City, FL, pp. 794-809.
9. Barkan, P. and Hinckley, C. M. (1993). The benefits and limitations of structured design methodologies, Manufacturing Review, 6(3), 211-220.
10. Bascaran, E., Bannerot, R. B. and Mistree, F. (1989). Hierarchical selection decision support problems in conceptual design, Engineering Optimization, 14, 207-238.
11. Batill, S. and Swift, R. (1993). Preliminary Structural Design-Defining the Design Space (WL-TR-93-3004). Hessert Center for Aerospace Research, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Norte Dame.
12. Beltracchi, T. (1990). A decomposition approach to solving the allup trajectory optimization problem, In 28th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, Reno, Nevada, Paper No. AIAA 90-0469, AIAA, Washington, D. C., pp. 1-11.
13. Bischof, C., Carle, A., Corlisss, G., Griewank, A. and Hovland, P. (1992). ADIFOR-Generating derivative codes from Fortran programs, Scientific Programming, 1(1), 1-29.