Deconvolution of long-pulse lidar signals with matrix formulation

Applied Optics

Volumn 36, Issue 21, 1997, Pages 5158-5161

  Park, Young Je ^a   Dho, Sang Whoe ^a   Kong, Hong Jin ^a  

^a Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide lidar; Deconvolution; Long pulse lidar; Signal processing

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001497545     PISSN: 1559128X     EISSN: 21553165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/AO.36.005158     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. 2 lidar, ” Appl. Opt. 22, 2257-2264 (1983).
2. M. J. Kavaya and R. T. Menzies, “Lidar aerosol backscatter measurement: systematic, modeling, and calibration error considerations, ” Appl. Opt. 24, 3444-3453 (1985).
3. 2 laser-based differential absorption lidar system for range-resolved and long-range detection of chemical vapor plumes, ” Appl. Opt. 34, 6187-6200 (1995).
4. 2 laser pulses in aerosol-backscattered coherent lidar returns, ” Appl. Opt. 27, 2719-2729 (1988).
5. 2 lidar data reduction, ” Appl. Opt. 27, 2730-2740 (1988).
6. L. L. Gurdev, T. N. Dreischuh, and D. V. Stoyanov, “Deconvolution techniques for improving the resolution of long-pulse lidars, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 10, 2296-2306 (1993).
7. J. D. Klett, “Stable analytical inversion solution for processing lidar returns, ” Appl. Opt. 20, 211-220 (1981).
8. T. N. Dreischuh, L. L. Gurdev, and D. V. Stoyanov, “Effect of pulse-shape uncertainty on the accuracy of deconvolved lidar profiles, ” J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 12, 301-306 (1995).