Role of symmetry reduction in the polarization dependence of the optical absorption in non-common-atom superlattices

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 58, Issue 4, 1998, Pages R1742-R1745

  Magri, Rita ^a   Ossicini, Stefano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MODENA AND REGGIO EMILIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001487347     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.R1742     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. O. Krebs and P. Voisin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1829 (1996).
2. W. Seidel, P. Voisin, J. P. André, and F. Bogani, Solid-State Electron. 40, 729 (1996).
3. O. Krebs, W. Seidel, J. P. André, D. Bertho, C. Jouanin, and P. Voisin, Semicond. Sci. Technol. 12, 938 (1997).
4. Y. Foulon and C. Priester, Phys. Rev. B 45, 6259 (1992).
5. J. F. Cornwell, Group Theory and Electronic Energy Bands in Solids (North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, 1969).
6. G. Kerker, J. Phys. C 13, L189 (1980).
7. D. M. Ceperley and B. J. Alder, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 566 (1980).
8. M. S. Hybertsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 64, 555 (1990).We have adjusted the bond lengths at the two interfaces to values closer to the two “bulk” bond distances, (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) corresponding to the strain parameter (Formula presented) (Ref. 11). Therefore (Formula presented) and (Formula presented), (Formula presented) being the calculated common bond length of the two lattice-matched constituents.