A Multiphase Godunov Method for Compressible Multifluid and Multiphase Flows

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 150, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 425-467

  Saurel, Richard ^a   Abgrall, Rémi ^b  

^a AIX MARSEILLE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ DE BORDEAUX   (France)

Author keywords

Eulerian methods; Godunov methods; Hyperbolic models; Interfaces; Multiphase flows; Non conservative equations; Shock waves

Indexed keywords

EQUATIONS OF STATE; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; SHOCK WAVES;

CONSERVATIVE EQUATIONS; EULERIAN METHOD; FLUID MIXTURES; GODUNOV METHOD; HYPERBOLIC MODELS; MULTI-FLUIDS; MULTIPHASES; NON-CONSERVATIVE EQUATION; PURE FLUIDS; SHOCK-WAVES;

MULTIPHASE FLOW;

EID: 0001485352     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1999.6187     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Abgrall R. Generalization of the Roe scheme for the computation of a mixture of perfect gases. Rech. Aérospat. 6:Dec. 1988.
2. Abgrall R. How to prevent pressure oscillations in multicomponent flow calculations: A quasi conservative approach. J. Comput. Phys. 125:1996;150-160.
3. Baer M. R., Nunziato J. W. A two-phase mixture theory for the deflagration-to-detonation transition (DDT) in reactive granular materials. Int. J. Multiphase Flow. 12:1986;861-889.
4. Baer M. R. A numerical study of shock wave reflections on low density foam. Shock Waves. 2:1992;121-124.
5. G. Baudin, Quercy, un programme de calcul thermochimique rapide pour évaluer l'état de Chapman-Jouguet et d'isentrope des explosifs condensés, 1992.
6. P. Bauer, O. Heuzé, A simple method for the calculation of detonation properties of CHNO explosives, Proceedings, International Symposium on High Dynamic Pressures, La Grande Motte, France, 1989, 225, 232.
7. Butler P. B., Lambeck M. F., Krier H. Modeling of shock development and transition to detonation initiated by burning in porous propellant beds. Combust. Flame. 46:1982;75-93.
8. Cocchi J. P., Saurel R. A Riemann problem based method for compressible multifluid flows. J. Comput. Phys. 137:1997;265-298.
9. G. Cochran, J. Chan, Shock initiation and detonation models in one and two dimensions, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Report, 1979.
10. Coquel F., El Amine K., Godlewski E., Perthame B., Rascle P. A numerical method using upwind schemes for the resolution of two-phase flows. J. Comput. Phys. 136:1997;272-288.
11. Davis S. F. Simplified second order Godunov type methods. SIAM J. Sci. Statist. Comput. 9:1988;445-473.
12. Delhaye J. M., Bouré J. A. General equations and two-phase flow modeling. Handbook of Multiphase Systems. 1:1982;36-95.
13. Drew D. A. Mathematical modeling of two-phase flows. Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 15:1983;261-291.
14. R. P. Fedkiw, A. Marquina, B. Merriman, An isobaric fix for the overheating problem in multimaterial compressible flows, 1998.
15. R. P. Fedkiw, B. Merriman, S. Osher, Simplified upwind discretisation of systems of hyperbolic conservation laws containing advection equations, with applications to compressible flows of multiphase, chemically reacting and explosive materials, 1998.
16. E. Fried, CHEETAH 1.39 User's Manual, Energetic Material Center, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, 1996.
17. Gallouet T., Masella J. M. Un schéma de Godunov approché C.R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. I. 323:1996;77-84.
18. Godunov S. K. A finite difference method for the numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics. Mat. Sb. 47:1959;357-393.
19. Godunov S. K., Zabrodine A., Ivanov M., Kraiko A., Prokopov G. Résolution numérique des problèmes multidimensionnels de la dynamique des gaz. 1979.
20. H. Guillard, C. Viozat, On the behavior of upwind schemes in the low Mach number limit, Comput. & Fluids, 28, 63, 86.
21. Haas J. F. Interaction of a Weak Shock Wave and Discrete Gas Inhomogeneities. 1984.
22. Haas J. F., Sturtevant B. Interaction of a weak shock wave with cylindrical and spherical gas inhomogeneities. J. Fluid Mech. 181:1987;41-76.
23. Harten A., Lax P. D., van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25:1983;33-61.
24. F. Harlow, A. Amsden, Fluid dynamics, LANL Monograph LA-4700, 1971.
25. O. Heuzé, Mémoire d'habilitation à diriger des recherches, Université d'Orléans, 1997.
26. Karni S. Multicomponent flow calculations by a consistent primitive algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 112:1994;31-43.
27. E. L. Lee, H. C. Horning, J. W. Kury, Adiabatic expansion of high explosives detonation products, Lawrence Radiation Lab. University of California, Livermore, 1968.
28. J. Massoni, R. Saurel, G. Demol, G. Baudin, A Mechanistic model for shock to detonation transition in solid energetic materials, Phys. Fluids.
29. Marsh S. P. LASL Shock Hugoniot Data. 1980.
30. Powers J. M., Stewart D. S., Krier H. Theory of two-phase detonation. Part I. Modeling. Combust. & Flame. 80:1990;264-279.
31. V. H. Ransom, Numerical benchmark tests, Multiphase Science and Technology, HewittDelhayeZuber, Hemisphere, Washington, DC, 1987, 3.
32. Rogue X. Expériences et simulations d'écoulements diphasiques en tube á choc. 1997.
33. Rogue X., Rodriguez G., Haas J. F., Saurel R. Experimental and numerical investigation of the shock-induced fluidization of a particle bed. Shock Waves. 8:1998;29-45.
34. Rusanov V. V. Calculation of interaction of non-steady shock waves with obstacles. J. Comput. Math. & Phys. USSR. 1:1961;267-279.
35. Sainsaulieu L. Finite volume approximations of two phase fluid flows based on an approximate Roe-type Riemann solver. J. Comput. Phys. 121:1995;1-28.
36. Saurel R., Larini M., Loraud J. C. Ignition and growth of a detonation by a high energy plasma. Shock Waves. 2:1992;91-102.
37. Saurel R., Daniel E., Loraud J. C. Two-phase flows: Second order scheme and boundary conditions. AIAA J. 32:1994;1214-1221.
38. Saurel R., Larini M., Loraud J. C. Exact and approximate Riemann solver for real gases. J. Comput. Phys. 112:1994;126-137.
39. Saurel R. Numerical analysis of Ram Accelerator employing two-phase combustion. AIAA J. Propulsion & Power. 12:1996;708-717.
40. R. Saurel, R. Abgrall, A simple method for compressible multifluid flows, SIAM J. Sci. Comput.
41. Saurel R., Massoni J. On Riemann problem based methods for detonation in solid energetic materials. Int. J. on Numer. Methods in Fluids. 26:1998;101-121.
42. R. Saurel, T. Gallouet, Modèles et méthodes numériques pour les écoulements fluides, Cours de DEA, Centre de Mathématiques et d'Informatique, Université de Provence, 1998.
43. R. Saurel, J. P. Cocchi, P. B. Butler, A numerical study of the cavitation effects in the wake of a hypervelocity underwater projectile, AIAA J. Propulsion & Power.
44. K. M. Shyue, An efficient shock-capturing algorithm for compressible multicomponent problems, J. Comput. Phys. 142, 208, 1998, 1997.
45. Strang. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 5:1968;506-517.
46. E. F. Toro, Riemann-problem based techniques for computing reactive two-phase flows, Proceedings, Third International Conference on Numerical Combustion, Antibes, France, May 1989, DervieuxLarrouturrou, Springer-Verlag, New York/Berlin, 1989, 351, 472, 481.
47. E. F. Toro, Some IVPs for which conservative methods fail miserably, Proceedings, 6th International Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics, Lake Tahoe, California, September 4-8, 1995.
48. Toro E. F. Riemann Solvers and Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics. 1997.
49. Toumi I., Kumbaro A. An approximate linearized Riemann solver for a two-fluid model. J. Comput. Phys. 124:1996;286-300.
50. van Leer B. Toward the ultimate conservative difference scheme. V. A second order sequel to Godunov's method. J. Comput. Phys. 32:1979;101.