메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 59, Issue 6, 1999, Pages 6766-6784

Effective hamiltonian for liquid-vapor interfaces

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE;

EID: 0001472633     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.59.6766     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (216)

References (84)
  • 1
    • 0004257079 scopus 로고
    • C.A. Croxton, Wiley, Chichester
    • Fluid Interfacial Phenomena, edited by C.A. Croxton (Wiley, Chichester, 1986).
    • (1986) Fluid Interfacial Phenomena
  • 2
    • 0003789527 scopus 로고
    • J. Chavrolin, J.F. Joanny, J. Zinn-Justin, Les Houches Summer School Lectures, Session XLVIII, Elsevier, Amsterdam
    • Liquids at Interfaces, edited by J. Chavrolin, J.F. Joanny, and J. Zinn-Justin, Les Houches Summer School Lectures, Session XLVIII (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1990).
    • (1990) Liquids at Interfaces
  • 3
    • 85037186754 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • G. Pétré and A. Sanfeld, Capillarity Today (Springer, Berlin, 1991)
    • G. Pétré and A. Sanfeld, Capillarity Today (Springer, Berlin, 1991).
  • 6
    • 0346310165 scopus 로고
    • an English translation can be found in J.S. Rowlinson, J. Stat. Phys. 20, 197 (1979).
    • (1979) J. Stat. Phys. , vol.20 , pp. 197
    • Rowlinson, J.S.1
  • 11
    • 85037189738 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • R. Evans, in Liquids at Interfaces 2, p. 3
    • R. Evans, in Liquids at Interfaces, 2, p. 3.
  • 52
    • 0018446914 scopus 로고
    • Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids, edited by D. Henderson (Dekker, New York, 1992), p. 85
    • R. Evans, Adv. Phys. 28, 143 (1979);in Fundamentals of Inhomogeneous Fluids, edited by D. Henderson (Dekker, New York, 1992), p. 85.
    • (1979) Adv. Phys. , vol.28 , pp. 143
    • Evans, R.1
  • 53
    • 36849103820 scopus 로고
    • leads to (Formula presented) and (Formula presented). The resulting nonanalyticity of (Formula presented) at (Formula presented) prevents an analytic evaluation of certain integrals involving (Formula presented). Our choice in Eq. (2.2) reduces to (Formula presented) for (Formula presented) with (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) and resembles closely (Formula presented) for small r (Formula presented); furthermore, (Formula presented) has the advantage that it is analytic and thus facilitates our following analysis. This advantage outweighs the fact that Eq. (2.2) deviates slightly from the standard WCA approach
    • Starting from a Lennard-Jones interaction potential (Formula presented) the standard separation into (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) according to WCA [J.D. Weeks, D. Chandler, and H.C. Andersen, J. Chem. Phys. 54, 5237 (1971)] leads to (Formula presented) and (Formula presented). The resulting nonanalyticity of (Formula presented) at (Formula presented) prevents an analytic evaluation of certain integrals involving (Formula presented). Our choice in Eq. (2.2) reduces to (Formula presented) for (Formula presented) with (Formula presented) and (Formula presented) and resembles closely (Formula presented) for small r (Formula presented); furthermore, (Formula presented) has the advantage that it is analytic and thus facilitates our following analysis. This advantage outweighs the fact that Eq. (2.2) deviates slightly from the standard WCA approach.
    • (1971) J. Chem. Phys. , vol.54 , pp. 5237
    • Weeks, J.D.1    Chandler, D.2    Andersen, H.C.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.