Sociology as a Source of Anomaly in Thomas Kuhn's System of Science

Philosophy of the Social Sciences

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 466-485

  Jacobs, Struan ^a   Mooney, Brian ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001443274     PISSN: 00483931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/004839319702700403     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. A word up your nose. 1993. The Economist, 7 August, 16.
2. Barnes, B., and D. Edge, eds. 1982. Science in context. Milton Keynes, MA: Open University Press.
3. Ben-David, J. 1991. Scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Bitz, A., A. McAlpine, and R. Whitley, eds. 1975. Production, flow and use of information in research laboratories in different sciences. London: British Library Report Series.
5. Chubin, D. 1976. The conceptualization of scientific specialties. Sociological Quarterly 17:448-76.
6. Collins, H. 1974. The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies 4:165-86. Reprinted as "Tacit knowledge and scientific networks," in B. Barnes and D. Edge, Science in context (Milton Keynes, MA: Open University Press, 1982), 44-64.
7. Collins, H. 1974. The TEA set: Tacit knowledge and scientific networks. Science Studies 4:165-86. Reprinted as "Tacit knowledge and scientific networks," in B. Barnes and D. Edge, Science in context (Milton Keynes, MA: Open University Press, 1982), 44-64.
8. Crane, D. 1969. Social structure in a group of scientists: A test of the "invisible college" hypothesis. American Sociological Review 34:335-52.
9. Edge, D. 1979. Quantitative measures of communication in science. History of Science 17:102-34.
10. Fleck, L. [1935] 1979. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
11. Garfield, E. 1964a. The use of citation data in writing the history of science. Philadelphia: Institute of Scientific Information.
12. _. 1964b. Science citation index. Philadelphia: Institute for Scientific Information.
13. _. 1979. Citation indexing - Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities. New York: John Wiley.
14. Garvey, W., and B. Griffith. 1971. Scientific communication. American Psychologist 26:349-62.
15. Gutting, G., ed. 1980. Paradigms and revolutions. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
16. _. 1980. Introduction. In Paradigms and revolutions, edited by G. Gutting, 1-22. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
17. Hagstrom, W. 1965. The scientific community. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
18. Hoyningen-Huene, P. 1993. Reconstructing scientific revolutions, translated by A. Levine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19. Kessler, M. 1965. Comparison of the results of bibliographic coupling and "analytic subject indexing." American Documentation 16:223-33.
20. Knorr-Cetina, K. 1981. The manufacture of knowledge. Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
21. _. 1982. Scientific communities or transepistemic arenas of research? Social Studies of Science 12:101-30.
22. _. 1983. New developments in science studies: The ethnographic challenge. Canadian Journal of Sociology 8:153-77.
23. Kuhn, T. [1957] 1959. The Copernican revolution. Reprint, New York: Vintage.
24. _. 1962. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chigaco: University of Chicago Press.
25. _. 1963. The function of dogma in scientific research. In Scientific change, edited by A. Crombie. London: Heinemann.
26. _. 1970a. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. _. 1970b. Logic of discovery or psychology of rersearch? In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28. _. 1977. The essential tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
29. MacIntyre, A. 1980. Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative, and the philosophy of science. In Paradigms and revolutions, edited by G. Gutting. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
30. Masterman, M. 1970. The nature of a paradigm. In Criticism and the growth of knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
31. McAlpine, A., et al. 1975. The investigation of patterns of social and intellectual organisation in the sciences. In The production, flow and use of information, edited by A. Bitz, A. McAlpine, and R. Whitley. Lomdon: British Library Report Series.
32. Menzel, H. 1966. Scientific communication: Five themes from social science research. American Psychologist 21:999-1004.
33. Merton, R. 1973. The sociology of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. Mulkay, M., G. Gilbert, and S. Woolgar. 1975. Problem areas and research networks in science. Sociology 9:187-203.
35. Musgrave, A. [1971] 1980. Kuhn's second thoughts. In Paradigms and revolutions, edited by G. Gutting, 39-53. Reprint, Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
36. Polanyi, M. [1942] 1951. Self-government of science. In The logic of liberty, edited by M. Polyani, 49-67. Reprint, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
37. _. 1962. The republic of science. Minerva 1:54-73.
38. Price, D. 1963. Little science, big science. New York: Columbia University Press.
39. _. 1965. Networks of scientific papers. Science 149:510-15.
40. Price, D., and D. Beaver. 1966. Collaboration in an invisible college. American Pscychologist 21:1011-18.
41. Shapere, D. [1964] 1980. The sctructure of scientific revolutions. In Paradigms and revolutions, edited by G. Gutting, 27-38. Reprint, Notre Dame: Notre Dame University.
42. Swanson, D. 1966. Scientific journals and information services of the future. American Psychologist, 21:1005-1010.
43. Whitley, R. 1975. Summary report of the study. In Production, flow and use of information in research laboratories in different sciences, edited by A. Bitz, A. McAlpine, and R. Whitley. London: British Library Report Series.
44. _. 1978. Types of science, organizational strategies and patterns of work in research laboratories in different scientific fields. Social Science Information 17:427-47.
45. Whitley, R. 1983. From the sociology of scientific communities to the study of scientists' negotiations and beyond. Social Science Information 22:681-720.