Foreign currency exposure of multinational firms: Accounting measures and market valuation

Contemporary Accounting Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 1997, Pages 623-652

  Bartov, Eli ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001443264     PISSN: 08239150     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00544.x     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Aggarwal, R. 1978. FASB no. 8 and reported results of multinational operations: Hazard for managers and investors. Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Finance 3 (Spring): 197-216.
2. Alford, A., J. J. Jones, and M. E. Zmijewski. 1994. Extensions and violations of the statutory SEC form 10-k filing requirements. Journal of Accounting and Economics 17 (1/2): 229-54.
3. Ayers, F. L. 1986. Characteristics of firms electing early adoption of SFAS no. 52. Journal of Accounting and Economics 8 143-58.
4. Ball, R., and P. Brown. 1968. An empirical evaluation of accounting income numbers. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (2): 159-78.
5. Ball R., and R. L. Watts. 1972. Some time series properties of accounting income. Journal of Finance 27 (3): 663-81.
6. Bartov, E., and G. M. Bodnar. 1994. Firm valuation, earnings expectations and the exchange-rate exposure effect. Journal of Finance 49 (5): 1755-85.
7. Basu, S. 1983. The relationship between earnings yields, market value, and return for NYSE common stocks: Further evidence. Journal of Financial Economics 12 (1): 129-56.
8. Beaver, W. H. 1968. The Information Content of Annual Earnings Announcements. Journal of Accounting Research 6 (Supp.): 67-92.
9. _, and J. S. Demski. 1979. The nature of income measurement. Accounting Review 54(1): 38-46.
10. _, and M. Wolfson. 1982. Foreign currency translation and changing prices in perfect and complete markets. Journal of Accounting Research 20 (2): 528-50.
11. Cheng, C. S. A., W. S. Hopwood, and J. C. McKeown. 1992. Non-linearity and specification problems in unexpected earnings response regression model. Accounting Review 67 (3): 579-98.
12. Choi, F. D. S., and G. G. Mueller. 1992. International accounting. 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
13. Christie, A. A. 1987. On cross-sectional analysis in accounting research. Journal of Accounting and Economics 9 231-58.
14. Collins, D. W., and W. K. Salatka. 1993. Noisy accounting earnings signals and earnings response coefficients: The case of foreign currency accounting. Contemporary Accounting Research 10(1): 119-60.
15. Conover, W. J. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
16. Cornell, B., and W. A. Landsman. 1989. Security price response to quarterly earnings announcements and analysts' forecast revisions. Accounting Review 64 (4): 680-92.
17. Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). Statement of Financial Accounting Concepts 1980. No. 2: Qualitative characteristics of accounting information. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
18. _. Statement of Financial Accounting Standards 1975. No. 8: Accounting for translation of foreign currency transactions and foreign currency financial statements. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
19. _. 1981. No. 52: Foreign currency translation. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
20. Freeman, R. N., and S. Y. Tse. 1992. A nonlinear model of security price responses to unexpected earnings. Journal of Accounting Research 30 (2): 185-209.
21. Frenkel, J. 1981. Flexible exchange rates, prices, and the role of news: Lessons from the 1970s. Journal of Political Economy 89 (4): 665-705.
22. Gilbert, L. R. 1989. The effect of SFAS 52 on earnings expectations. Ph.D. dissertation Boston University, Boston, Mass.
23. Goldberg, R. S., and J. H. Godwin. 1994. Foreign currency translation under two cases integrated and isolated economies. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting 5 (2): 97-119.
24. Griffin, P. A., and R. P. Castanias. 1987. Accounting for translation of foreign currencies: The effect of statement 52 on equity analysts. Norwalk, CT: FASB.
25. Helns, John. 1986. Plenty of opportunity to fool around. Forbes (June 2): 139-40.
26. Holthausen, R. W., and R. E. Verrecchia. 1988. The effect of sequential information releases on the variance of price changes in an intertemporal multi-asset market. Journal of Accounting Research 26 (1): 82-106.
27. Jorion, P. 1990. The exchange rate exposures of U.S. multinationals. Journal of Business 63 (3): 331-45.
28. Lee, C. J. 1985. Stochastic properties of cross-sectional financial data. Journal of Accounting Research 23 (1): 213-27.
29. Massaro, V. G. 1978. Corporate experience with FASB statement no. 8. Conference Board Information Bulletin No. 4 New York: Conference Board.
30. Ohlson, J. A., and S. H. Penman. 1992. Disaggregated accounting data as explanatory variables for returns. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 7 (4): 553-73.
31. Ou, J. A., and S. H. Penman. 1989. Financial statement analysis and the prediction of stock returns. Journal of Accounting and Economics 11 (4): 295-329.
32. Scholes, M., and J. Williams. 1977. Estimating betas from nonsychronous data. Journal of Financial Economics 5 (3): 309-27.
33. Sease, Douglas R. 1991. The dollar rally: Hit on profits may drag down stock market ... . Wall Street Journal (July 8): C1.
34. Selling, T. I., and G. H. Sorter. 1983. FASB statement no. 52 and its implications for financial statement analysis. Financial Analysts Journal 39 (3): 64-9.
35. Soo, B. S., and L. G. Soo. 1994. Accounting for the multinational firm: is the translation process valued by the stock market? Accounting Review 69 (4): 617-38.
36. White, G. I., A. C. Sondhi, and D. Fried. 1994. The analysis and use of financial statements. New York: Wiley & Sons, Inc.
37. White, H. 1980. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48: 817-38.
38. Wojciechowski, S. R. 1982. Du Pont evaluates SFAS 52. Management Accounting 64 (1): 31-5.
39. Ziebart, D. A., and D. H. Kim. 1987. An examination of the market reactions associated with SFAS no. 8 and SFAS no. 52. Accounting Review 62 (2): 343-57.