Comparative evaluation of hypermesh and multi-stage interconnection networks

Computer Journal

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 1996, Pages

  Ould Khaoua, M ^a   Mackenzie, L M ^b   Sotudeh, R ^a  

^a TEESSIDE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001433781     PISSN: 00104620     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/comjnl/39.3.232     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Fox, G. C. et al. (1988) Solving problems on concurrent processors, Vol. 1. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
2. Nugent, S. F. (1988) The iPSC/2 direct-connect communication technology. Proc. Conf. on Hypercube Concurrent Computers & Applications. ACM, pp. 51-60.
3. Reed, D. A. and Fujimoto, R. M. (1987) Multicomputer networks: Message-based parallel processing, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
4. Dally, W. J. (1990) Performance analysis of fc-ary n-cubes interconnection networks, IEEE Trans. Comp., 39 (6), 775-785.
5. Abraham, S. (1992) Issues in the architecture of direct interconnection networks schemes for multiprocessors. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
6. Chien, A. A. (1993) A cost model for k-ary n-cubes wormhole routers. Proc. Hot Interconnects Workshop.
7. Scott, S. L. and Goodman, J. R. (1994) The impact of pipelined channel on k-ary n-cube networks, IEEE Trans. Par. Dist. Syst., 5 (1), 2-16.
8. Seigel, H. J. (1990) Interconnection networks for large-scale parallel processing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.
9. Szymanski, T. (1995) Hyper-meshes: Optical Interconnection Networks for Parallel Processing. JPDC., 26, 1-26.
10. Crowther, W., Goodhue, J., Thomas, R., Milliken, I. and Blackadar W., (1985) Performance Measurements on a 128-node butterfly parallel processor. Proc. ICPP'85, pp. 531-540.
11. Gottlieb, A. et al. (1983) The NYU Ultracomputer-Designing a MIMD shared-memory parallel machine. IEEE Trans. Comp. C32, 175-189.
12. Lipovsky, G. J. and Malek, M. (1989) Parallel Computing: Theory and Practice. John Wiley & Sons, p. 487.
13. Berge, C. (1973) Graphs and hypergraphs, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
14. Mackenzie, L. M., Ould-Khaoua, M., Sutherland, R. and Kelly, T. (1991) COBRA: A High-Performance Interconnection Network for Large Multicomputer. Tech-Report 119/ R19, Computer Sciences Department, University of Glasgow.
15. Ould-Khaoua, M. (1994) Hypergraph-based interconnection networks for large multicomputers. Ph.D. Thesis, Computer Sciences Department, University of Glasgow.
16. Tanabe, N. et al. (1991) Base-m n-cube: high performance interconnection networks for highly parallel computer PRODIGY. Proc. ICPP'91, 509-16.
17. Wittie, L. D. (1981) Communication structures for large networks of microcomputers. IEEE Trans. Comp., C30 (4), 264-273.
18. Bhuyan, L. M. and Agaiwal, P. D. (1984) Generalised hypercube and hyperbus structures for a computer network. IEEE Trans. Comp., C33 (4), 323-333.
19. Dowd, P. W. (1991) High performance interprocessor communication through optical wavelength division multiple access channels. Proc. Int. Symp. Comp. Arch., 96-105.
20. Ni, L. M and Panda, D. K. (1994) Sea of interconnection networks: What's your choice. A report of the ICPP '94 Pannel, Proc. ICPP'94.
21. Agarwal, A. (1991) Limits on interconnection network performance. IEEE Trans. Par. Dist. Syst., 2, 398-412.
22. Lenoski, D. et al. (1992) The Stanford DASH Multiprocessor. IEEE Computer, March, 63-79.
23. Seitz, C. L. et al (1985) The hypercube communication chip. Department of Computer Sciences, CalTech, Display File 5182:DF:85.
24. Sullivian, H. and Barkshow, T. R. (1977) A large scale homogeneous machine I. Proc. ACM 4th Annu. Symp. on Comp. Arch., pp. 105-117.