Matching disparate views of planar surfaces using projective invariants

Image and Vision Computing

Volumn 18, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 673-683

  Lourakis, M I A ^a,b   Halkidis, S T ^a,b   Orphanoudakis, S C ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF COMPUTER SCIENCE   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CRETE   (Greece)

Author keywords

Correspondence problem; Geometric invariance; Planar surfaces; Plane homography; Wide baseline stereo matching

Indexed keywords

ANTENNAS;

CORRESPONDENCE PROBLEMS; GEOMETRIC INVARIANCE; HOMOGRAPHIES; PLANAR SURFACE; WIDE BASELINE STEREO;

STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING;

EID: 0001420868     PISSN: 02628856     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(99)00071-2     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. L.G. Brown, A survey of image registration techniques, ACM Comp. Surv. 24 (4) (1992) 325-376.
2. U.R. Dhond, J.K. Aggarwal, Structure from stereo: a review, IEEE Trans. SMC 19 (6) (1989) 1489-1510.
3. D.W. Eggert, A. Lorusso, R. Fisher, Estimating 3-D rigid-body transformations: a comparison of four major algorithms, MVA 9 (5/6) (1997) 272-290.
4. T.S. Huang, A.N. Netravali, Motion and structure from feature correspondences: a review, Proc. IEEE 82 (2) (1994) 252-268.
5. Q.-T. Luong, O. Faugeras, Self-calibration of a moving camera from point correspondences and fundamental matrices, IJCV 22 (3) (1997) 261-289.
6. S. Noronha, R. Nevatia, Detection and description of buildings from multiple aerial images, in: Proceedings of CVPR'97, June 1997, pp. 588-594.
7. I. Weiss, Geometric invariants and object recognition, IJCV 10 (3) (1993) 207-231.
8. M.I.A. Lourakis, R. Deriche, Camera self-calibration using the singular value decomposition of the fundamental matrix: from point correspondences to 3D measurements. RR-3748, INRIA Sophia-Antipolis, August 1999. Available at http://www.inria.fr/rapports/sophia/RR-3748.html.
9. S.B. Kang, A survey of image-based rendering techniques, in: Video-metrics VI (SPIE International Symposium on Electronic Imaging: Science and Technology), San Jose, CA, 1999, pp. 2-16.
10. J.H. McIntosh, K.M. Mutch, Matching straight lines, CVGIP43 (3) (1988) 386-408.
11. C. Medioni, R. Nevatia, Matching images using linear features, IEEE Trans. PAMI PAMI-6 (6) (1984) 675-686.
12. Z. Zhang, A new and efficient iterative approach to image matching, in: Proceedings of ICPR'94, Jerusalem, Israel, 1994, pp. 563-565.
13. N. Georgis, M. Petrou, J. Kittler, On the correspondence problem for wide angular separation of non-coplanar points, IVC 16 (1998) 35-41.
14. C. Schmid, A. Zisserman, Automatic line matching across views, in: Proceedings of CVPR'97, 1997, pp. 666-671.
15. P. Fornland, C. Schnörr, A robust and convergent iterative approach for determining the dominant plane from two views without correspondence and calibration, Proceedings of CVPR'97, Puerto Rico, June 1997 pp. 508-513.
16. P. Pritchett, A. Zisserman, Wide baseline stereo matching, in: Proceedings of ICCV'98, Bombay, India, January 1998, pp. 754-760.
17. M.A. Fischler, R.C. Bolles, Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography, Communications of the ACM 24 (1981) 381-385.
18. K. Kanatani, Computational cross ratio for computer vision, CVGIP 60 (3) (1994) 371-381.
19. J.B. Burns, R.S. Weiss, E.M. Riseman, The non-existence of general-case view invariants, in: J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman (Eds.), Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992, pp. 120-134 chap. 6.
20. J.L. Mundy, A. Zisserman, Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1992.
21. A. Shashua, Projective structure from uncalibrated images: structure - from-motion and recognition, IEEE Trans. PAMI 16 (8) (1994) 778-790.
22. P. Meer, R. Lenz, S. Ramakrishna, Efficient invariant representations, IJCV 26 (2) (1998) 137-152.
23. Y. Lamdan, J.T. Schwartz, H.J. Wolfson, Object recognition by affine invariant matching, in: Proceedings of CVPR'88, 1988, pp. 235-344.
24. J. Nagao, W.E.L. Grimson, Affine matching of planar sets, CVIU 70 (1) (1998) 1-22.
25. P. Gros, O. Bournez, E. Boyer, Using local planar geometric invariants to match and model images of line segments, CVIU 69 (2) (1998) 135-155.
26. C.A. Rothwell, A. Zisserman, D.A. Forsyth, J.L. Mundy, Planar object recognition using projective shape representation, IJCV 16 (1) (1995) 57-99.
27. O. Faugeras, Three-dimensional Computer Vision: a Geometric Viewpoint, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993.
28. K.I. Kanatani, Computational projective geometry, CVGIP 54 (3) (1991) 333-348.
29. R. Mohr, Projective geometry and computer vision, in: C.H. Chen, L.F. Pau, P.S.P. Wang (Eds.), Handbook of Pattern Recognition and Computer Vision, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, 1993, pp. 369-393 chap. 2.4.
30. P.J. Rousseeuw, Least median of squares regression, J. Am. Statist. Ass. 79 (1984) 871-880.
31. M.I.A. Lourakis, S.C. Orphanoudakis, Visual detection of obstacles assuming a locally planar ground, Proceedings of ACCV'98, LNCS No. 1352, Hong Kong, China, January, Vol. 2, 1998, pp. 527-534.
32. F.P. Preparata, M.I. Shamos, Computational Geometry: an Introduction, Springer, Berlin, 1985 chap. 2.
33. P. Meer, A. Mintz, A. Rosenfeld, Robust regression methods for computer vision: a review, Int. J. Comp. Vis. 6 (1) (1991) 59-70.
34. I. Zoghlami, O. Faugeras, R. Deriche, Using geometric corners to build a 2D mosaic from a set of images, in: Proceedings of CVPR'97, Puerto Rico, June 1997, pp. 420-425.
35. Q.-T. Luong, O.D. Faugeras, Determining the fundamental matrix with planes: instability and new algorithms, in: Proceedings of CVPR'93, 1993, pp. 489-494.
36. P.H.S. Torr, A. Zisserman, Robust computation and parametrization of multiple view relations, in: Proceedings of ICCV'98, Bombay, India, 1998, pp. 727-732.
37. D. Sinclair, A. Blake, Quantitative planar region detection, IJCV 18 (1) (1996) 77-91.