Documenting contributory expertise: The value added by technical communicators in collaborative writing situations

Technical Communication

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 207-220

  Henry, Jim ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001416810     PISSN: 00493155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Association of Teachers of Technical Writing. 1996. Special issue on visual rhetoric. Technical communication quarterly 5, no. 1.
2. Blackwell, C. Al. 1995. "A good installation guide increases user satisfaction and reduces support costs." Technical communication 41:56-60.
3. Bumett, Rebecca A. 1991. "Substantive conflict in a cooperative context: A way to improve the collaborative planning of workplace documents." Technical communication 38:532-529.
4. Carliner, Saul. 1992. "What you should get from a professionally oriented master's degree program in technical communication." Technical communication 39:189-199.
5. Carliner, Saul. 1997. "Demonstrating effectiveness and value: A process for evaluating technical communication products and services." Technical communication 44:252-265.
6. Couture, Barbara, and Jone Rymer. 1991. "Discourse interaction between writer and supervisor: A primary collaboration in workplace writing." In Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Mary M. Lay and William M. Karis, eds., pp. 87-108. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
7. Cover, Martha, David Cooke, and Matt Hunt. 1995. "Estimating the high cost of high-quality documentation." Technical communication 41:76-83.
8. Debs, Mary Beth. 1991. "Recent research on collaborative writing in industry." Technical communication 38:476-484.
9. Debs, Mary Beth. 1993. "Corporate authority: Sponsoring rhetorical practice." In Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Rachel Spilka, ed., pp 158-170. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
10. Ede, Lisa, and Andrea Lunsford. 1990. Singular texts/Plural authors. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
11. Gladis, Stephen D. 1993. WriteType: Personality types and writing styles. Amherst, MA: Human Resources Development Press, Inc.
12. Haselkom, Mark P. 1997. "The future of technical communication." Technical communication 44:220-221.
13. Henry, Jim. 1994. "Toward technical authorship." Journal of technical writing and communication 24, no. 4:449-461.
14. Henry, Jim. 1995. "Teaching technical writers to be anthropologists." In Proceedings, 42nd annual conference of the Society for Technical Communication, pp. 5-8. Arlington, VA: Society for Technical Communication.
15. Kleimann, Susan. 1993. "The reciprocal nature of workplace culture and review." In Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Rachel Spilka, ed., pp. 56-70. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
16. Kramer, Robert, and Stephen A. Bernhardt. 1996. "Teaching text design." In Technical communication quarterly 5, no. 1:35-60.
17. Locker, Kitty O. 1992. "What makes a collaborative writing team successful? A case study of lawyers and social workers in a state agency." In New visions of collaborative writing. Janis Forman, ed., pp. 37-62. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton-Cook.
18. Lunsford, Andrea A., and Lisa Ede. 1994. "Collaborative authorship and the teaching of writing." In The construction of authorship: Textual appropriation in law and literature. Martha Woodmansee and Peter Jaszi, eds., pp. 417-438. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
19. Malone, Elizabeth L. 1991. "Facilitating groups through selective participation: An example of collaboration from NASA," In Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Mary M. Lay and William M. Karis, eds., pp. 109-119. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
20. Mirel, Barbara, Susan Feinberg, and Leif Allmendinger. 1995. "Collaboration between writers and graphic designers in documentation projects." In Journal of business and technical communication 9, no 3:259-288.
21. Morgan, Meg, and Mary Murray. 1991. "Insight and collaborative writing." In Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Mary M. Lay and William M. Karis, eds., pp. 64-81. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
22. Paradis, James, David Dobrin, and Richard Miller. 1985. "Writing at Exxon ITD: Notes on the writing environment of an R&D organization." In Writing in nonacademic settings. Lee Odell and Dixie Goswami, eds., pp. 281-307. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
23. Porter, James E., and Patricia Sullivan. 1996. "Working across methodological interfaces: The study of computers and writing in the workplace." In Electronic literacies in the workplace: Technologies of writing. Patricia Sullivan and Jennie Dautermann, eds., pp. 294-322. Urbana, IL: National Council of Teachers of English and Computers and composition.
24. Redish, Janice. 1995. "Adding value as a professional technical communicator." Technical communication 41:52-55.
25. Reich, Robert. 1992. The work of nations. New York, NY: Vintage.
26. Reither, James A. 1993. "Scenic motives for collaborative writing in workplace and school." In Writing in the workplace: New research perspectives. Rachel Spilka, ed., pp. 195-206. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
27. SAGE publications. 1997. Special issue: How can we address international issues in business and technical communication? Journal of business and technical communication 11, no. 3.
28. Shirk, Henrietta Nickels. 1991. "Collaborative editing: A combination of peer and hierarchical editing techniques." In Collaborative writing in industry: Investigations in theory and practice. Mary M. Lay and William M. Karis, eds., pp. 242-261. Amityville, NY: Baywood.
29. Society for Technical Communication. 1996. Special issue: Technical communication in cyberspace. Technical communication 43, no. 4.
30. Spencer, Cathy J., and Diana Kilbourn Yates. 1995. "A good user's guide means fewer support calls and lower support costs." Technical communication 41:52-55.