First evaluation of ultrafast (ground state) intramolecular electron transfer rate in solution by NMR spin-lattice relaxation. An application to mixed-valence biferrocene monocation (Fe(II), Fe(III))

Journal of Physical Chemistry A

Volumn 101, Issue 12, 1997, Pages 2245-2253

  Masuda, Akiko ^a,b   Masuda, Yuichi ^a   Fukuda, Yutaka ^a  

^a OCHANOMIZU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001411788     PISSN: 10895639     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jp963317n     Document Type: Review

References (93)

1. See for example: (a) Dynamics and Mechanisms of Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Related Phenomena; Mataga, M., Okada, T., Masuhara, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992. (b) Barbara, P. F.; Jarzeba, W. Adv. Photochem. 1990, 15, 1.
2. See for example: (a) Dynamics and Mechanisms of Photoinduced Electron Transfer and Related Phenomena; Mataga, M., Okada, T., Masuhara, H., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992. (b) Barbara, P. F.; Jarzeba, W. Adv. Photochem. 1990, 15, 1.
3. (a) Kosower, E. M.; Huppert, D. Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem. 1986, 37, 127.
4. (b) Maroncelli, M.; MacInnis, J.; Fleming, G. R. Science 1989, 243, 1670.
5. (c) Weaver, M. J.; McManis, G. E. Acc. Chem. Res. 1990, 23, 294.
6. (d) Barbara, P. F.; Walker, G. C.; Smith, T. P. Science 1992, 256, 975.
7. (e) Heitele, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 359.
8. Bolton, J. R.; Mataga, N.; McLendon, G. Electron Transfer in Inorganic, Organic, and Biological Systems; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 1991.
9. Jortner, J.; Bixon, M. Protein Structure; Molecular and Electronic Reactivity; Austin, R., Buhks, E., Chance, B., Voult, D., Dutton, P. L., Fauenfelder, H., Gol'danski, V. I., Eds.; Saringer: New York, 1987; p 277.
10. (a) Robin, M. B.; Day, P. Adv. Inorg. Chem. Radiochem. 1967, 10, 247.
11. (b) Creutz, C. Prog. Inorg. Chem. 1983, 30, 1.
12. (a) Jordan, K. D.; Paddon-row, M. N. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 395.
13. (b) Nelsen, S. F. Adv. Electron Transfer Chem. 1993, 3, 167.
14. -1 by the ESR line broadening measurements. (See: Grampp, G.; Jaenicke, W. Ber. Bunsen-Ges. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 9094.)
15. See for example: Zundel, G.; Fritsch, J. In Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 38. The Chemical Physics of Salvation Part B; Ulstrup, K., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986; Chapter 2.
16. (a) Levich, V. G. In Kinetics Chemistry of Reactions with Charge Transport; Eyring, H., Henderson, D., Jost, W., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1970; Vol. 9B, p 985.
17. (b) Weaver, M. J. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 463.
18. (c) Perez, V.; Luch, J. M.; Bertram, J. J. Mol. Liq. 1995, 63, 77 and references therein.
19. (a) Nielsen, R. M.; McManis, M.; Golovin, M. N.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1988, 92, 3441.
20. (b) Gennett, T.; Milner, F.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 2787.
21. (c) McManis, G. E.; Weaver, M. J. J. Chem. Phys. 1989, 90, 912.
22. (d) Phelps, D. K.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 7187.
23. (e) McManis, G. E.; Gochev, A.; Nielson, R. M.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7733.
24. The effect of the diffusion process and the distribution between the donor and acceptor at their close distance is another important subject for intermolecular ET studies. (See for example: (a) Rice, S. A. Diffusive-Limited Reactions; Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics Vol. 25; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985. (b) Tachiya, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5911. (c) J. Phys. Chen. 1989, 93, 7050. (d) Sumi, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3334.)
25. The effect of the diffusion process and the distribution between the donor and acceptor at their close distance is another important subject for intermolecular ET studies. (See for example: (a) Rice, S. A. Diffusive-Limited Reactions; Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics Vol. 25; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985. (b) Tachiya, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5911. (c) J. Phys. Chen. 1989, 93, 7050. (d) Sumi, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3334.)
26. The effect of the diffusion process and the distribution between the donor and acceptor at their close distance is another important subject for intermolecular ET studies. (See for example: (a) Rice, S. A. Diffusive-Limited Reactions; Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics Vol. 25; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985. (b) Tachiya, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5911. (c) J. Phys. Chen. 1989, 93, 7050. (d) Sumi, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3334.)
27. The effect of the diffusion process and the distribution between the donor and acceptor at their close distance is another important subject for intermolecular ET studies. (See for example: (a) Rice, S. A. Diffusive-Limited Reactions; Comprehensive Chemical Kinetics Vol. 25; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1985. (b) Tachiya, M. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 5911. (c) J. Phys. Chen. 1989, 93, 7050. (d) Sumi, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3334.)
28. Farrar, T. C.; Becker, E. D. Pulse and Fourier Transform NMR; Academic Press: New York, 1971; Chapter 4.
29. (a) Abragam, A. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1961; Chapter VIII.
30. (b) Boere, R. T.; Kidd, R. G. Annu. Rep. NMR Spectrosc. 1982, 13, 319.
31. (a) Steele, W. A. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1986, 34, 1.
32. (b) Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. In Structure and Dynamics of Solution; Ohtaki, H., Yamatera, H., Eds., Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1992; Chapter 4.
33. -5 s.
34. Hertz, H. G. In The Chemical Physics of Salvation. Part B; Dogonadze, R. R., Kalman, E., Kornyshev, A. A., Ulstrap, J., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1986; Chapter 7.
35. Powell, D. H.; Helm. L.; Merbach, A. E. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 9258.
36. (a) Kaufman, F.; Cowan, D. O. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1970, 92, 6198.
37. (b) Cowan, D. O.; Condela, G. A.; Kaufman, F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1971, 93, 3889.
38. (c) Morrison, W. H.; Hendrickson, D. N. Inorg. Chem. 1975, 14, 2331.
39. (d) Dong, T. Y.; Kambara, T.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4423.
40. (e) Lowey, M. D.; Hammack, W. S.; Drickamer, H. G.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8019.
41. (a) Dong, T. Y.; Kambara, T.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 5857.
42. (b) Nakashima, S.; Masuda, Y.; Motoyama, I.; Sano, H. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 1987, 60, 1673.
43. (c) Dong, T. Y.; Hendrickson, D. N.; Pierpont, C. G.; Moore, M. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 107, 4777.
44. (a) Cowan, D. O.; Collins, R. L.; Kaufmann, F. J. Phys. Chem. 1971, 75, 2025.
45. (b) Morrison, W. H.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Chem. Phys. 1974, 59, 380.
46. (c) LeVanda, C.; Bechgaard, K.; Cowan, D. O.; Mueller-Westerhoff, U. T.; Eilbracht, P.; Candela, G. A.; Collins, R. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1976, 98, 3181.
47. Kramer, J. A.; Hendrickson, D. N. Inorg. Chem. 1980, 19, 3330.
48. (a) Rausch, M. D. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 1802.
49. (b) Fish, R. W.; Rosenblum, M. J. Org. Chem. 1965, 30, 1253.
50. (c) Shechter, H.; Helling, J. F. J. Org. Chem. 1961, 26, 1034.
51. - were prepared according to ref 18e with minor modifications.
52. Swift, T. J.; La Mar, G. N. In NMR of Paramagnetic Molecule; La-Mar, G. N., Horrocks Jr., W. D., Holm, R. H., Eds.; Academic Press: New York, 1973; Chapters 1 and 2.
53. Banci, L.; Bertini, I.; Luchinat, C. Nuclear and Electron Relaxation; VCH Publishers: New York, 1991; Chapter 5.
54. -1.
55. Prins, R.; Reinders, F. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1969, 91, 4929.
56. hyp.
57. -1 in the present study.
58. r(eff) values of the cyclopentadienyl and the fulvalene protons.
59. (a) Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1983, 87, 5339.
60. (b) Masuda, Y.; Yamatera, H. J. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 3425.
61. Maki, A. H.; Berry, T. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1965, 87, 4437.
62. Burton, W.; Morgan, L. O. In Transition Metal Chemistry; Carlim, R., Ed.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1968; Vol. 4, pp 33.
63. r values in the solvents other than acetone are listed in Table 3.
64. McManis, G. E.; Nielson, R. M.; Weaver, M. J. Inorg. Chem. 1988, 27, 1827.
65. Gachter, B. F.; Koningstein, J. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1975, 62, 4628.
66. op were disregarded.
67. (a) Rips, I.; Jortner, J. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 87, 2090.
68. (b) Van der Zwan, G.; Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 4181.
69. (c) Hynes, J. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 3701.
70. (a) Sumi, H.; Marcus, R. A. J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 4247.
71. (b) J. Chem. Phys. 1986, 84, 4896.
72. Sumi, H. J. Mol. Liq. 1995, 65, 65.
73. (b) J. Phys. Chem. 1996, 100, 4831.
74. (c) Sumi, H.; Asano, T. J. Chem. Phys. 1995, 102, 9565.
75. Phelps, D. K.; Weaver, M. J. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 7187.
76. Zhu, J.; Rasaiah, J. C. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 3325.
77. Scrupulous calculations of the v., values according to ref 38b considering the contribution of nonadiababicity gave similar results.
78. (a) Akesson, E.; Walker, G. C.; Barbara, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 4188.
79. (b) Akesson, E.; Jhonson, A. E.; Levinger, N. E.; Walker, G. C.; DuBruil, T. P.; Barbara, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1992, 96, 7859.
80. (a) Tominaga, K.; Kliner, D. A. V.; Johnson, A. E.; Levinger, N. E ; Barbara, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1993, 98, 1228.
81. (b) Kliner, D. A. V.; Tominaga, K.; Walker, G. C.; Barbara, P. F. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1992, 114, 8323.
82. Jortner, J.; Bixon, M. J. Chem. Phys. 1988, 88, 167.
83. (a) Weaver, M. J.; McManis, G. E.; Jarzeba, W.; Barbara, P. F. J. Phys. Chem. 1990, 94, 1715.
84. (b) J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 90, 6563.
85. (a) Barthel, J.; Bachhuber, K.; Buchner, R.; Hetzenauer, H. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1990, 165, 369.
86. (b) Maroncelli, M. J. Mol. Liq. 1993, 57, 1.
87. (c) Bagchi, B.; Chandra, A. Adv. Chem. Phys. 1991, 80, 1.
88. (a) Rosenthal, S. J.; Xie, X.; Du, M.; Fleming, G. R. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 95, 4715.
89. (b) Kahlow, M. A.; Kang, T. J.; Barbara, P. F. J. Chem. Phys. 1987, 86, 3183.
90. (c) Jarzzeba, W.; Walker, G. C.; Johonson, A. E.; Kahlow, M. A.; Barbara, P. F. Chem. Phys. 1991, 152, 111.
91. McMorrow, D.; Lotsaw, W. T. J. Phys. Chem. 1991, 95, 10395.
92. The quantization axis for the dipolar interaction was assumed to be along the main axis of the g tensor because the rotational correlation time is significantly longer than the electron spin relaxation time. (See section 3.2 and Table 1.) The isotropic hyperfine interactions were also assumed.
93. + and bfc. (See Table 1.)