Isozyme variation in Echinocereus engelmannii var. munzii (Cactaceae)

Conservation Biology

Volumn 10, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 622-631

  Neel, Maile C ^a,b   Clegg, Janet ^b   Ellstrand, Norman C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001392390     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996.10020622.x     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Avise, J. C. 1989. A role for molecular genetics in the recognition and conservation of endangered species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 4:279-281.
2. Bayer, R. J. 1990. Investigations into the evolutionary history of the Antennaria rosea (Asteraceae: Inuleae) polyploid complex. Plant Systematics and Evolution 169:97-110.
3. Bayer, R. J. 1992. Allozyme variation, genecology and phytogeography of Antennaria arcuata (Asteraceae) a rare species from the Great Basin and Red Desert with small disjunct populations. American Journal of Botany 79:872-81.
4. Benson, L. 1982. The cacti of the United States and Canada. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California.
5. Berg, K. S. 1986. Population dynamics of Erysimum menziesii, a facultative biennial mustard. Pages 351-358 in T. S. Elias, editor. Conservation and management of rare and endangered plants. California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California.
6. Bradshaw, M. E., and J. P. Doody. 1978. Plant population studies and their relevance to nature conservation. Biological Conservation 14: 223-242.
7. Briggs, D., and S. M. Walters. 1984. Plant variation and evolution. 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.
8. Clausen, J., and W. M. Hiesey. 1958. Experimental studies on the nature of species. IV. Genetic structure of ecological races. Publication no. 615. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, D.C.
9. Ehrlich, P. 1992. Population biology of checkerspot butterflies and the preservation of global diversity. Oikos 63(1):6-12.
10. Ellstrand, N. C. 1984. Multiple paternity within the fruits of wild radish, Raphanus sativus. American Naturalist 123:819-828.
11. Ellstrand, N. C. 1992. Gene flow by pollen: implications for plant conservation genetics. Oikos 63:77-86.
12. Ellstrand, N., and B. Devlin. 1989. Transmission genetics of isozyme loci in Raphanus sativus (Brassicaceae): Stress-dependent non-mendelian segregation. American Journal of Botany 76(1):40-46.
13. Falk, D. A. and K. E. Holsinger. 1991. Editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
14. Felber, F. 1991. Establishment of a tetraploid cytotype in a diploid population. Effect of relative fitness of the cytotypes. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 4(2):195-207.
15. Ferguson, D. J. 1989. Revision of the U.S. members of the Echinocereus triglochidiatus group. Cactus and Succulent Society Journal 61:217-224.
16. Fiedler, P. L. 1987. Life history and population dynamics of rare and common mariposa lilies (Calochortus Pursh: Liliaceae). Journal of Ecology 75:977-995.
17. Friend, A. D., and F. I. Woodward. 1990. Evolutionary and ecophysiological responses of mountain plants to the growing season environment. Advances in ecological research, vol 20. Academic Press, New York.
18. Frost, C. C. 1990. Hudsonia Montana final report: effects of fire, trampling and interspecies competition, 1985-1989. Part 1. North Carolina Department of Agriculture Plant Conservation Program, Raleigh.
19. Gottlieb, L. D. 1977. Electrophoretic evidence and plant systematics. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 64:161-180.
20. Hamrick, J. L. and R. W. Allard. 1972. Microgeographical variation in allozyme frequencies in Avena barbata. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 69:2100-2104.
21. Hedrick, P. 1971. A new approach to measuring genetic similarity. Evolution 25:276-280.
22. Holsinger, K. E., and L. D. Gottlieb. 1991. Conservation of rare and endangered plants: principles and prospects. Pages 149-170 in D. A. Falk, and K. E. Holsinger, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
23. Holtsford, T. P., and N. C. Ellstrand. 1992. Genetics and environmental variation in floral traits affecting outcrossing rate in Clarkia tembloriensis (Onagraceae). Evolution 46:216-225.
24. Karron, J. D. 1989. Breeding systems and levels of inbreeding depression in geographically restricted and widespread species of Astragalus (Fabaceae). American Journal of Botany 76(3): 331-340.
25. Laerm, J., J. A. Avise, J. C. Patton, and R. A. Lansman. 1982. Genetic determination of the status of an endangered pocket gopher in Georgia. Journal of Wildlife Management 46:513-518.
26. Les, D. H., J. A. Reinartz, and E. J. Esselman. 1991. Genetic consequences of rarity in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae), a threatened, self-incompatible plant. Evolution 45:1641-1650.
27. Lesica, P., R. F. Leary, F. W. Allendorf and D. E. Bilderback. 1988. Lack of genic diversity within and among populations of an endangered plant, Howellia aquatilis. Conservation Biology 2(3):275-282.
28. Lesica, P., and J. S. Shelly. 1992. Effects of cryptogamic soils crust on the population dynamics of Arabis fecunda (Brassicaceae). The American Midland Naturalist 128(1):53-60.
29. Levin, D. A. 1995. Plant outliers: and ecological perspective. American Naturalist 145:109-118.
30. Menges, E. S. 1986. Predicting the future of rare plant populations: demographic monitoring and modeling. Natural Areas Journal 6(3): 13-25.
31. Menges, E. S., and S. C. Gawler. 1986. Four-year changes in population size of the endemic Furbish's Lousewort: implications for endangerment and mangement. Natural Areas Journal 6(1):6-17.
32. Millar, C. I., and W. J. Libby. 1991. Strategies for conserving clinal, ecotypic, and disjunct populations diversity in widespread species. Pages 149-170 in D. A. Falk, and K. E. Holsinger, editors. Genetics and conservation of rare plants. Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Munz, P. 1974. A flora of southern California. University of California Press, Berkeley.
34. Nickrent, D. L. and D. Wiens. 1989. Genetic diversity in the rare California shrub Dedeckera eurekensis (Polygonaceae). Systemic Botany 14:245-253.
35. Parfitt, B. 1987. Echinocerous nicholii (L. Benson Parfitt, Stat. Nov. (Cactaceae). Phytologia 63(3):157-158.
36. Parish, S. 1926. Cereus munzii sp. nov. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 25:48.
37. Pierce, W., and F. R. Fosberg. 1933. Echinocereus engelmannii Parry var. munzii (Parish) Pierce and Fosberg n. comb. Bulletin of the Southern California Academy of Science 32:123.
38. Plessas M. E. and S. H. Strauss. 1986. Allozyme differentiation among populations, stands and cohorts in Monterey pine. Canadian Journal of Forestry Research 16:1155-1164.
39. Powell, A. M., A. D. Zimmerman, and R. A. Hilsenbeck. 1991. Experimental documentation of natural hybridization in cactaceae: origin of Lloyd's hedgehog cactus, Echinocereus X lloydii. Plant Systematics and Evolution 178:107-122.
40. Ramey, R. R. II, 1991. Genetics and conservation of North American mountain sheep: implications for management on BLM Lands. Bureau of Land Management, Riverside, California.
41. Smith, J. P., Jr., and K. Berg. 1988. Inventory of rare and endangered vascular plants of California. Special publication no. 1. 4th edition. Sacramento, California.
42. Soltis, D. E., and P. S. Soltis. 1989. Isozymes in plant biology. Dioscorides Press, Portland, Oregon.
43. Taylor, N. 1985. The genus Echinocereus. A Kew magazine monograph. The Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, and Timber Press, Portland Oregon.
44. Thompson, J. D., and R. Lumaret. 1992. The evolutionary dynamics of polyploid plants: origins, establishment and persistence. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 7(9):302-307.
45. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1979a. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination that the purple-spined hedgehog cactus and Wright fishhook cactus are endangered species. Final rule. Federal Register 44(198):58866-58868.
46. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1979b. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: determination that Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. inermis is an endangered species. Final rule. Federal Register 44(217):64744-64746.
47. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1979c. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Determination that Echinocereus lloydii is an endangered species. Final rule. Federal Register 44(209):916.
48. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 1989. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Delisting of Echinocereus engelmannii var. purpureus (purple-spined hedgehog cactus). Final rule. Federal Register 54(226):48749-48751.
49. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. USFWS 1993. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: Proposal to delist Echinocereus triglochidiatus var. inermis (spineless hedgehog cactus). Proposed rule. Federal Register 58(9):4401-4403.
50. Varvio, S. L., R. Chakraborty, and M. Nei. 1986. Genetic variation in subdivided populations and conservation genetics. Heredity 57: 189-198.
51. Waser, N. M., and M. V. Price. 1985. Reciprocal transplant experiments with Delphinium nelsonii (Ranunculaceae): evidence for location adaption. American Journal of Botany 72:1726-1732.
52. Weedin, J. F., A. M. Powell, and D. O. Kolle. 1989. Chromosome numbers in Chihuahuan Desert Cactaceae. II. Trans-Pecos Texas. The Southwestern Naturalist 31(1):160-164.
53. Wolff, K. and J. Haeck. 1990. Genetic analysis of ecologically relevant morphological variability in Plantago lanceolata L. VI. The relation between allozyme heterozygosity and some fitness components. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 3:243-255.
54. Wright, R. D. 1990. Species biology of Lindera melissifolia (Walt.) Blume. in northeast Arkansas. Pages 176-179 in R. S. Mitchell, C. J. Sheviak, and D. J. Leopold, editors. Ecosystem management: Rare species and significant habitats. Proceedings of the 15th annual natural areas conference. Bulletin no. 471. New York State Museum, New York.
55. Wright, S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97-159.
56. Wright, S. 1943. Isolation by distance. Genetics 28:114-138.