High-accuracy finite-difference schemes for linear wave propagation

SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 328-346

  Zingg, David W ^a   Lomax, Harvard ^b   Jurgens, Henry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Finite difference schemes; High accuracy; Phase error; Wave propagation

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001344224     PISSN: 10648275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1137/S1064827594267173     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. R. M. ALFORD, K. R. KELLY, AND D. M. BOORE, Accuracy of finite-difference modeling of the acoustic wave equation, Geophysics, 39 (1974), pp. 834-842.
2. R. M. BEAM AND R. F. WARMING, The asymptotic spectra of banded Toeplitz and quasi-Toeplitz matrices, SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 14 (1993), pp. 971-1006.
3. C. L. CHEN, S. R. CHAKRAVARTHY, AND B. L. BIHARI, Numerical Solution of Acoustic Equations with Unstructured Grids Using a CFD-Based Approach, AIAA Paper 92-2698, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1992.
4. G. COHEN AND P. JOLY, Fourth order schemes for the heterogeneous acoustics equation, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 80 (1990), pp. 397-407.
5. M. A. DABLAIN, The application of high-order differencing to the scalar wave equation, Geophysics, 51 (1986), pp. 54-66.
6. S. DAVIS, Matrix-Based Finite Difference Algorithms for Computational Acoustics, AIAA Paper 90-3942, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1990.
7. _, Low-dispersion finite difference methods for acoustic waves in a pipe, J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 90 (1991), pp. 2775-2781.
8. O. HOLBERG, Computational aspects of the choice of operator and sampling interval for numerical differentiation in large-scale simulation of wave phenomena, Geophys. Prospecting, 35 (1987), pp. 629-655.
9. S. K. LELE, Compact finite difference schemes with spectral-tike resolution, J. Comput. Phys., 103 (1992), pp. 16-42.
10. K. J. MARFURT, Accuracy of finite-difference and finite-element modeling of the scalar and elastic wave equations, Geophysics, 49 (1984), pp. 533-549.
11. P. SGUAZZERO, M. KINDELAN, AND A. KAMEL, Dispersion-bounded numerical integration of the elastodynamic equations with cost-effective staggered schemes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg., 80 (1990), pp. 165-172.
12. V. SHANKAR, A. H. MOHAMMADIAN, AND W. F. HALL, A time-domain finite-volume treatment for the Maxwell's equations. Electromagnetics, 10 (1990), pp. 127-147.
13. A. TAFLOVE, Re-inventing Electromagnetics: Supercomputing Solution of Maxwell's Equations Via Direct Time Integration on Space Grids, AIAA Paper 92-0333, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1992.
14. C. K. W. TAM, Discretization Errors Inherent in Finite Difference Solution of Propellor Noise Problems, AIAA J., 30 (1992), pp. 608-615.
15. C. K. W. TAM AND J. C. WEBB, Dispersion-relation-preserving finite difference schemes for computational acoustics, J. Comput. Phys., 107 (1993), pp. 262-281.
16. R. VICHNEVETSKY AND J. B. BOWLES, Fourier Analysis of Numerical Approximations of Hyperbolic Equations, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 1982.
17. M. YARROW, J. A. VASTANO, AND H. LOMAX, Pulsed Plane Wave Analytic Solutions for Generic Shapes and the Validation of Maxwell's Equations Solvers, AIAA Paper 92-0016, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1992.
18. D. W. ZINGG AND H. LOMAX, On the eigensystems associated with numerical boundary schemes for hyperbolic equations, in Numerical Methods for Fluid Dynamics, M. J. Baines and K. W. Morton, eds., Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993, pp. 473-481.
19. _, Some Aspects of High-Order Numerical Solutions of the Linear Convection Equation with Forced Boundary Conditions, AIAA Paper 93-3381 in the Proc. of the 11th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conf., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1993.
20. D. W. ZINGG, P. D. GIANSANTE, AND H. M. JURGENS, Experiments with High-Accuracy Finite-Difference Schemes for the Time-Domain Maxwell Equations, AIAA Paper 94-0232, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1994.
21. D. W. ZINGG, E. M. EPSTEIN, AND H. M. JURGENS, A Comparison of Finite-Difference Schemes for Computational Aeroacoustics, AIAA Paper 95-0162, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, New York, 1995.