Random matrices and the replica method

Nuclear Physics B

Volumn 596, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 548-566

  Kanzieper, E ^a  

^a HITACHI CAMBRIDGE LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Random matrix theory; Replica method; Spectral statistics

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001333957     PISSN: 05503213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0550-3213(00)00749-5     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. S.F. Edwards, P.W. Anderson, J. Phys. F 5 (1975) 965.
2. F.J. Wegner, Z. Phys. B 35 (1979) 207; L. Schäfer, F.J. Wegner, Z. Phys. B 38 (1980) 113.
3. F.J. Wegner, Z. Phys. B 35 (1979) 207; L. Schäfer, F.J. Wegner, Z. Phys. B 38 (1980) 113.
4. K.B. Efetov, A.I. Larkin, D.E. Khmelnitskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 52 (1980) 568.
5. K.B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 467; K.B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. 32 (1983) 53.
6. K.B. Efetov, Sov. Phys. JETP 56 (1982) 467; K.B. Efetov, Adv. Phys. 32 (1983) 53.
7. K.B. Efetov, Supersymmetry in Disorder and Chaos, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1997.
8. J.J.M. Verbaarschot, H.A. Weidenmüller, M.R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rep. 129 (1985) 367.
9. E.P. Wigner, Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 47 (1951) 790.
10. L.P. Gorkov, G.M. Eliashberg, Sov. Phys. JETP 21 (1965) 940.
11. A.M. Finkelstein, Sov. Phys. JETP 57 (1983) 97; A.M. Finkelstein, Z. Phys. B 56 (1984) 189.
12. A.M. Finkelstein, Sov. Phys. JETP 57 (1983) 97; A.M. Finkelstein, Z. Phys. B 56 (1984) 189.
13. J.J.M. Verbaarschot, M.R. Zirnbauer, Ann. Phys. (NY) 158 (1984) 78.
14. B.L. Altshuler, B.I. Shklovskii, Sov. Phys. JETP 64 (1986) 127.
15. J.J.M. Verbaarschot, M.R. Zirnbauer, J. Phys. A 17 (1985) 1093.
16. J.L. van Hemmen, R.G. Palmer, J. Phys. A 12 (1979) 563.
17. A. Kamenev, M. Mézard, J. Phys. A 32 (1999) 4373.
18. C. Itzykson, J.B. Zuber, J. Math. Phys. 21 (1980) 411.
19. A. Kamenev, M. Mézard, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 3944.
20. I.V. Yurkevich, I.V. Lerner, Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 3955.
21. A.V. Andreev, B.L. Altshuler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 902.
22. M.R. Zirnbauer, cond-mat/9903338, 1999.
23. J.J. Duistermaat, G. Heckman, Invent. Math. 69 (1982) 259, Invent. Math. 72 (1983) 153.
24. J.J. Duistermaat, G. Heckman, Invent. Math. 69 (1982) 259, Invent. Math. 72 (1983) 153.
25. We notice in passing that determinantal representation similar to Eq. (1.3) can be derived by conventional RMT tools without appealing to a σ-model mapping (see, for instance, E. Brézin, S. Hikami, math-ph/9910005).
26. 1 (r) = sin(r)/r. This equation is a consequence of the Darboux's formula for Hankel-type determinants, and is known as a version of the discrete Toda equation.
27. M.L. Mehta, Random Matrices, Academic Press, Boston, 1991.
28. This formula is used for β= 2. For technical reasons, at β= 1 and β= 4 we make use of Eq. (3.13).
29. C.A. Tracy, H. Widom, J. Stat. Phys. 92 (1998) 809.
30. H. Lee, L.S. Levitov, A.Yu. Yakovets, Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 4079; K.A. Muttalib, Y. Chen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 1999.
31. H. Lee, L.S. Levitov, A.Yu. Yakovets, Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995) 4079; K.A. Muttalib, Y. Chen, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 10 (1996) 1999.
32. A.V. Andreev, B.D. Simons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75 (1995) 2304.
33. C. Andréief, Mém. Soc. Sci. (Bordeaux) 2 (1883) 1.
34. H.W. Segar, Messenger of Mathematics 22 (1893) 57.
35. N.G. de Bruijn, J. Indian Math. Soc. 19 (1955) 133.
36. M.L. Mehta, Matrix Theory: Selected Topics and Useful Results, Les Éditions de Physique, 1989.
37. N(χ,y) = φk(y) for k ∈ (0, . . . , N - 1).
38. E. Brézin, A. Zee, Nucl. Phys. B 402 (1993) 643.
39. E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, in: J.-P. Fouque (Ed.), Waves in Diffuse Media, NATO ASI, Ser. C, Vol. 531, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1999.
40. V. Freilikher, E. Kanzieper, I. Yurkevich, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 2200, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 210; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3806; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) 1161; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6604.
41. V. Freilikher, E. Kanzieper, I. Yurkevich, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 2200, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 210; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3806; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) 1161; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6604.
42. V. Freilikher, E. Kanzieper, I. Yurkevich, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 2200, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 210; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3806; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) 1161; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6604.
43. V. Freilikher, E. Kanzieper, I. Yurkevich, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 2200, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 210; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3806; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) 1161; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6604.
44. V. Freilikher, E. Kanzieper, I. Yurkevich, Phys. Rev. E 53 (1996) 2200, Phys. Rev. E 54 (1996) 210; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 3806; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Philos. Mag. B 77 (1998) 1161; E. Kanzieper, V. Freilikher, Phys. Rev. E 57 (1998) 6604.
45. The identities (3.10) can be proven along the lines of Appendix A where a bit more involved cases of symplectic and orthogonal symmetries are treated.
46. The confinement potentials V (E) is said to be 'strong' if it increases at least as |E| at infinity.
47. H. Widom, J. Stat. Phys. 94 (1999) 347.
48. M. Şener, J.J.M. Verbaarschot, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 248.
49. V.E. Kravtsov, M.R. Zirnbauer, Phys. Rev. B 46 (1992) 4332.
50. N. Taniguchi, A. Hashimoto, B.D. Simons, B.L. Altshuler, Europhys. Lett. 27 (1994) 335.
51. F. von Oppen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 798.