Ordering of viscous liquid mixtures under a steady shear flow

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2000, Pages

  Shou, Zhenyu ^a   Chakrabarti, Amitabha ^a  

^a KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LIQUIDS; MIXTURES; PHASE SEPARATION; VISCOSITY;

LAYERED STRUCTURES; POWER LAW EXPONENT; POWER-LAW BEHAVIOR; RHEOLOGICAL BEHAVIORS; SCALING PREDICTION; SHEAR DIRECTION; STEADY SHEAR FLOW; VISCOUS LIQUIDS;

SHEAR FLOW;

EID: 0001331164     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.61.R2200     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. For a review, see A. Onuki, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 6119 (1997).
2. T. Hashimoto, K. Matsuzaka, E. Moses, and A. Onuki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 126 (1995).
3. E. K. Hobbie, S. Kim, and C. C. Han, Phys. Rev. E 54, R5909 (1996).
4. A. Frischknecht, Phys. Rev. E 56, 6970 (1997)
5. Phys. Rev. EA. Frischknecht58, 3495 (1998).
6. T. Ohta, H. Nozaki, and M. Doi, Phys. Lett. A 145, 304 (1990)
7. T. OhtaH. NozakiM. DoiJ. Chem. Phys. 93, 2664 (1990).
8. F. Corberi, G. Gonnella, and A. Lamura, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3852 (1998).
9. J. Läuger, C. Laubner, and W. Gronski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3576 (1995).
10. Y. Wu, H. Skrdla, T. Lookman, and S. Chen, Physica A 239, 428 (1997).
11. P. Padilla and S. Toxvaerd, J. Chem. Phys. 106, 2342 (1997).
12. P. C. Hohenberg and B. I. Halperin, Rev. Mod. Phys. 49, 435 (1977).
13. A. J. Bray, Adv. Phys. 43, 357 (1994).
14. W. H. Press, B. P. Flannery, S. A. Teulolsky, and W. Vetter- ling, Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1986).
15. M. M. Rogers, P. Moin, and W. C. Reynolds, Report No. NCC-2-5 TF-25, 1986 (unpublished).
16. Even though the remeshing may cause an aliasing error for turbulent systems, it works well in our case.
17. The snapshots shown here are for a (Formula presented) system; however, several runs for a larger system of size (Formula presented) are carried out to make sure that finite-size effects have not influenced results for the exponents.
18. The domain size (Formula presented) computed from the correlation function relates to the “radius” of the domains so that its computed value is approximately half of the pattern “diameter” shown in the snapshots.
19. The absolute value of the domain size in the presence of hydrodynamics is also bigger than the domain size in the absence of the hydrodynamics.
20. K. Kawasaki, Ann. Phys. (N.Y.) 61, 1 (1970).
21. T. Hashimoto, T. Takebe, and S. Suehiro, J. Chem. Phys. 88, 5874 (1988).
22. M. Doi and T. Ohta, J. Chem. Phys. 95, 1242 (1991).
23. R. Yamamoto and X. C. Zeng, Phys. Rev. E 59, 3223 (1999).