A statistical framework for space-based EUV ionospheric tomography

Radio Science

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 437-447

  Kamalabadi, Farzad ^a,b   Karl, William C ^b,d   Semeter, Joshua L ^a,b,c   Cotton, Daniel M ^a   Cook, Timothy A ^a   Chakrabarti, Supriya ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Boston University   (United States)

^c MAX PLANCK INSTITUT FÜR EXTRATERRESTRISCHE PHYSIK   (Germany)

^d Dept of Elec and Comp Engineering ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EXTREME ULTRAVIOLET LITHOGRAPHY; F REGION; NUMBER THEORY; RADIO ASTRONOMY; REMOTE SENSING; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS; TOMOGRAPHY;

ESTIMATION UNCERTAINTIES; ILL-CONDITIONED INVERSE PROBLEM; IONOSPHERIC REMOTE SENSING; IONOSPHERIC TOMOGRAPHY; LEAST-SQUARES INVERSION; RADIATIVE RECOMBINATION; STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK; STATISTICAL RECONSTRUCTION;

INVERSE PROBLEMS;

EID: 0001329761     PISSN: 00486604     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1998RS900026     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Austen, J. R., S. J. Franke, and C. H. Liu, Ionospheric imaging using computerized tomography, Radio Sci., 23(3), 299-307, 1988.
2. Bertero, M., Linear inverse and ill-posed problems, in Advances in Electronics and Electron Physics 75, edited by P. Hawkes, pp. 1-120, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1989.
3. Censor, Y., Finite series expansion reconstruction methods, Proc. IEEE, 71(3), 409-419, 1983.
4. Chakrabarti, S., R. Kimble, and S. Bowyer, Spectroscopy of the EUV (350-1400 Å) nightglow, J. Geophys. Res., 89, 5660-5664, 1984.
5. Daniell, R. E., Jr., L. D. Brown, D. N. Anderson, M. W. Fox, P. H. Doherty, D. T. Decker, J. J. Sojka, and R. W. Schunk, Parameterized ionospheric model: A global ionospheric parameterization based on first principles models, Radio Sci., 30(5), 1499-1510, 1995.
6. Demoment, G., Image reconstruction and restoration: Overview of common estimation structures and problems, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 37(12), 2024-2036, 1989.
7. Fremouw, E. J., J. A. Secan, and B. M. Howe, Application of stochastic inverse theory to ionospheric tomography, Radio Sci., 27(5), 721-732, 1992.
8. Hansen, P. C., Numerical tools for analysis and solution of Fredholm integral equation of the first kind, Inverse Problems, 8, 849-872, 1992.
9. Julienne, P. S., J. Davis, and E. Oran, Oxygen recombination in the tropical nightglow, J. Geophys. Res., 79(16), 2540-2543, 1974.
10. Louis, A. K., and F. Natterer, Mathematical problems of computerized tomography, Proc. IEEE, 71(3), 379-389, 1983.
11. 2 3914 Å emission rates within an auroral arc, Planet. Space Sci., 39(6), 895-906, 1991.
12. Meier, R. R., Ultraviolet spectroscopy and remote sensing of the upper atmosphere, Space Sci. Rev., 58, 1-185, 1991.
13. Pryse, S. E., and L. Kersley, A preliminary experimental test of ionospheric tomography, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys., 54(7), 1007-1012, 1992.
14. Raymund, T. D., J. R. Austen, S. J. Franke, C. H. Liu, J. A. Klobuchar, and J. Stalker, Application of computerized tomography to the investigation of ionospheric structures, Radio Sci., 25(5), 771-789, 1990.
15. Semeter, J., and M. Mendillo, A nonlinear optimization technique for ground-based atmospheric emission tomography, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 35(5), 1105-1116, 1997.
16. Solomon, S. C., P. B. Hayes, and V. J. Abreu, Tomographic inversion of satellite photometry, Appl. Opt., 23, 3409-3414, 1984.
17. Solomon, S. C., P. B. Hayes, and V. J. Abreu, Tomographic inversion of satellite photometry. 2, Appl. Opt., 24, 4134-4140, 1985.
18. Tikhonov, A. N., Solution of incorrectly formulated problems and the regularization method, Sov. Dokl., 4, 1035-1038, 1963.
19. Van Trees, H. L., Detection, Estimation, and Modulation Theory, John Wiley, New York, 1968.
20. Yeh, K. C., and T. D. Raymund, Limitations of ionospheric imaging by tomography, Radio Sci., 26(6), 1361-1380, 1991.