Speech, Gesture, and Discourse

Discourse Processes

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 1992, Pages 277-301

  Levy, Elena T ^a   McNeill, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001326874     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638539209544813     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Chafe, W. L. (1976). Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of view. In E. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 25–55). New York: Academic.
2. Clancy, P. M. (1980). Referential choice in English and Japanese narrative discourse. In W. Chafe (Ed.), The pear stories: Cognitive, cultural and linguistic aspects of narrative production (Vol. 3, pp. 127–202). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
3. Clark, E. V. (1988). On the logic of contrast. Journal of Child Language, 15, 317–335.
4. Danes, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization ofthe text. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). The Hague: Mouton.
5. Firbas, J. (1964). On defining the theme in functional sentence analysis. Travaux Linguistiques de Prague, 1, 267–280.
6. Firbas, J. (1971). On the concept of communicative dynamism in the theoryof functional sentence perspective. Philologica Pragensia, 8, 135–144.
7. Firbas, J. (1974). Some aspects of the Czechoslovak approach to problems of functional sentence perspective. In F. Danes (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 11–37). The Hague: Mouton.
8. Fowler, C., &; Housum, J. (1987). Talkers' signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners' perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 489–504.
9. Fowler, C., &; Levy, E. (1991, August). Some ways in which forms arise from functions in linguistic communications. In A. Cutler (Chair), Prosody in situations of communication. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Scientists, Aix-en-Provence, France.
10. Gathercole, V. C. (1989). Contrast: A semantic constraint? Journal of Child Language, 16, 685–702.
11. Grosz, B. (1977). The representation and use of focus in dialogue understanding. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of California, Berkeley.
12. Grosz, B. (1981). Focusing description in natural language dialogues. In A. Joshi, B. L. Webber, &; I. Sag (Eds.), Elements of discourse understanding (pp. 84–105). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. Halliday, M. A. K., &; Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
14. Haviland, E. E., &; Clark, H. H. (1974). What's new? Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 13, 512–521.
15. Kendon, A. (1980). Gesticulation and speech: Two aspects of the process of utterance. In M. R. Key (Ed.), The relation between verbal and nonverbal communication (pp. 207–227). The Hague: Mouton.
16. Kendon, A. (1988). Sign languages of Aboriginal Australia: Cultural, semiotic and communicative perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Levy, E. T. (1984). Communicating thematic structure in narrative discourse: The use of referring terms and gestures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Department of Behavoral Sciences, University of Chicago.
18. Marslen-Wilson, W., Levy, E., &; Tyler, L. K. (1982). Producing interpretable discourse: The establishment and maintenance of reference. In R. Jarvella &;W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 339–378). Chichester, England: Wiley.
19. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350–371.
20. McNeill, D., &; Levy, E. (1982). Conceptual representations in language activity and gesture. In R. Jarvella &; W. Klein (Eds.), Speech, place, and action (pp. 271–295). Chichester, England: Wiley.
21. McNeill, D., Levy, E., &; Pedelty, L. L. (1990). Gestures and speech. In G. R. Hammond (Ed.), Advances in psychology: Cerebral control of speech and limb movements (pp. 203–256). Amsterdam: Elsevier/North Holland.
22. Reichman, R. (1978). Conversational coherency. Cognitive Science, 2, 283–327.
23. Silverstein, M. (1985). The culture of language in Chinookan narrative texts; or, On saying that in Chinook. In J. Nicols &; A. Woodbury (Eds.), Grammar inside and outside the clause (pp. 132 – 171).
24. clause (pp. 132–171). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language (E. Hanfmann &; G. Vakar, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.