Unified analysis of cosmological perturbations in generalized gravity

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 1996, Pages 762-765

  Hwang, Jai chan ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001318856     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.762     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. E. Alvarez, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 561 (1989).
2. Y. M. Cho, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3133 (1992).
3. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1982).
4. A. A. Starobinsky, Phys. Lett. 91B, 99 (1980);
5. D. La and P. J. Steinhardt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 62, 376 (1989).
6. J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. 11, 2305 (1994).
7. J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. 7, 1613 (1990).
8. J. M. Bardeen, in Cosmology and Particle Physics, edited by L. Fang and A. Zee (Gordon and Breach, London, 1988), p. 1.
9. J. Hwang, Astrophys. J. 375, 443 (1991).
10. J. Hwang and H. Minn, in Proceedings of the Second Alexander Friedmann International Seminar on Gravitation and Cosmology, edited by Yu. N. Gnedin, A. A. Grib, and V. M. Mostepanenko (Friedmann Laboratory, St. Petersburg, 1994), Sec. 6, p. 265.
11. In the large scale limit ((formula presented) /z gg (formula presented)) we have citeRussian, GGT2, Mukhanov etal v (x, η) = (formula presented) (x) z + (formula presented) (x) z (formula presented) sub 0 d η / (formula presented). By matching (formula presented) = - C and (formula presented) = D, it is equivalent to (refUCG delta phi LS sol).
12. L. A. Kofman and V. F. Mukhanov, JETP Lett. 44, 619 (1986);
13. V. F. Mukhanov, L. A. Kofman and D. Yu. Pogosyan, Phys. Lett. B 193, 427 (1987);
14. L. A. Kofman, V. F. Mukhanov and D. Yu. Pogosyan, Sov. Phys. JETP 66, 433 (1988);
15. V. F. Mukhanov, Phys. Lett. B 218, 17 (1989);
16. M. B. Baibosunov, V. Ts. Gurovich and U. M. Imanaliev, Sov. Phys. JETP 71, 636 (1990).
17. J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 195 (1991);
18. J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, L133 (1991);
19. J. Hwang, Sec. 4.2 of Astrophys. J. 380, 307 (1991).
20. V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman and R. H. Brandenberger, Phys. Rep. 215, 203 (1992).
21. J. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 42, 2601 (1990).
22. E. D. Stewart and D. H. Lyth, Phys. Lett. B 302, 171 (1993).
23. In the zero shear gauge we let chi equiv 0; δ φsub chi equiv δ φ - dot φ chi is a gauge invariant combination which becomes δ φ in the zero shear gauge. The equation and asymptotic solutions were derived in citeGGT2 and Sec. 4.3.2 of citePRW (see also citeH GGT, Russian, Mukhanov etal); these can also be presented in unified forms citeHwang Noh.
24. J. Hwang and H. Noh (unpublished).
25. J. Hwang, Phys. Rev. D 48, 3544 (1993).
26. J. Hwang, Astrophys. J. 427, 542 (1994);
27. J. Hwang, Gen. Relativ. Grav. 26, 299 (1994).
28. In these cases (refMSF eq) becomes an equation which appears often in the context of quantum field in curved spacetime citeQFCS. Analyses were made in the cases of power law citePOW and exponential expansion citeEXP. Parallel analyses in the context of our perturbative approach were made in citeH QFT, MSF UCG.
29. L. H. Ford and L. Parker, Phys. Rev. D 16, 245 (1977);
30. L. F. Abbott and M. B. Wise, Nucl. Phys. B244, 541 (1984).
31. T. S. Bunch and P. C. W. Davies, Proc. R. Soc. A360, 117 (1978).
32. E. M. Lifshitz, J. Phys. (USSR) 10, 116 (1946);
33. J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 22, 1882 (1980);
34. J. Hwang and J. J. Hyun, Astrophys. J. 420, 512 (1994).
35. δ (formula presented) equiv δ µ - (a/k) dot µ v and δ (formula presented) equiv δ T - (a/k) dot T v are gauge invariant combinations. The comoving gauge takes v equiv 0 where v equiv -(k/a) ψ/(µ + p); for ψ see Sec. 2.1.2 of citePRW.
36. J. Hwang, Astrophys. J. 427, 533 (1994);
37. J. Hwang, Astrophys. J. 415, 486 (1993).
38. For analytic derivations of perturbation spectrums generated from quantum fluctuations in the minimally coupled scalar field case, see citeH QFT, Stewart Lyth. Previous attempts in some generalized gravity case can be found in citeRussian, Mukhanov etal, pert GGT infl. We have not used the conformal transformation in this paper.
39. D. S. Salopek, J. R. Bond and J. M. Bardeen, Phys. Rev. D 40, 1753 (1989);
40. E. W. Kolb, D. S. Salopek and M. S. Turner, Phys. Rev. D 42, 3925 (1990);
41. J. Hwang, Class. Quantum Grav. 8, 195 (1991);
42. R. Fakir, S. Habib and W. Unruh, Astrophys. J. 394, 396 (1992);
43. A. H. Guth and B. Jain, Phys. Rev. D 45, 426 (1992);
44. S. Mollerach and S. Matarrese, Phys. Rev. D 45, 1961 (1992);
45. N. Deruelle, C. Gundlach and D. Langlois, Phys. Rev. D 46, 5337 (1992);
46. M. Gasperini and G. Veneziano, Phys. Rev. D 50, 2519 (1994).