An index formalism that generalizes the capabilities of matrix notation and algebra to n-way arrays

Journal of Chemometrics

Volumn 15, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 689-714

  Harshman, Richard A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Candecomp; Linear and multilinear algebra; N way arrays; Parafac; T2; T3; Tensors; array notation; Three way models; Tucker

Indexed keywords

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

ARRAY NOTATION; CANDECOMP; LINEAR AND MULTILINEAR ALGEBRA; MULTI-LINEAR ALGEBRAS; N-WAY ARRAY; PARAFAC; T2; T3; TENSOR;; THREE-WAY MODEL; TUCK;

TENSORS;

EID: 0001299069     PISSN: 08869383     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cem.665     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bro R. Multi-way Analysis in the Food Industry: Models, Algorithms and Applications. University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam, 1998; http://www.mli.kvl.dk/staff/foodtech/brothesis.pdf [1 March 2001].
2. Kiers HAL. Towards a standardized notation and terminology in multiway analysis. J. Chemometrics 2000; 14: 105-122.
3. Harshman RA, Hong S. 'Stretch' vs. 'slice' methods for representing three-way structure via matrix notation. Department of Psychology Research Bulletin #761, University of Western Ontario, London, ON, 2001.
4. Alsberg BK. A diagram notation for N-mode array equations. J. Chemometrics 1997; 11: 251-266.
5. Burdick DS. An introduction to tensor products with applications to multiway data analysis. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1995; 28: 229-237.
6. Akivis MA, Goldberg VV. An Introduction to Linear Algebra and Tensors (rev. English edn), Silverman RA (transl. and ed.). Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1972.
7. Paatero P. The multilinear engine - a table-driven, least squares program for solving multilinear problems, including the n-way parallel factor analysis model. Comput. Graph. Statist. 1999; 8: 854-888.
8. Harshman RA. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: models and conditions for an 'explanatory' multimodal factor analysis. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 1970; 16: 1-84.
9. Carroll JD, Chang JJ. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way Eckart-Young decomposition. Psychometrika 1970; 35: 283-319.
10. Tucker LR. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis. Psychometrika 1966; 31: 279-311.
11. Kroonenberg PM. Three-mode Principal Component Analysis. DSWO Press: Leiden, 1983.
12. Harshman RA. PARAFAC2: mathematical and technical notes. UCLA Working Papers Phonet. 1972; 22: 30-44.
13. Carroll JD, Wish M. Models and methods for three-way multidimensional scaling. In Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology. vol. 2, Krantz DH, Atkinson RC, Luce RD, Suppes P (eds). Freeman: San Francisco, CA 1974; 57-105.
14. Harshman RA, Lundy ME. PARAFAC: parallel factor analysis. Comput. Statist. Data Anal. 1994; 18: 39-72.
15. Rao CR, Mitra SK. Generalized Inverse of Matrices and Its Applications. Wiley: New York, 1971.
16. Harshman RA, Lundy ME. Data preprocessing and the extended PARAFAC model. In Research Methods for Multimode Data Analysis, Law HG, Snyder Jr CW, Hattie JA, McDonald RP (eds). Praeger: New York, 1984; 216-284.
17. Kruskal JB, Harshman RA, Lundy ME. How 3-MFA data can cause degenerate PARAFAC solutions, among other relationships. In Multiway Data Analysis, Coppi R, Bolasco S (eds). North-Holland: Amsterdam, 1989; 115-121.