Simulation of the physiological responses of C3 plant leaves to environmental factors by a model which combines stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration

Acta Botanica Sinica

Volumn 40, Issue 8, 1998, Pages 740-754

  Yu, Qiang ^a   Wang, Tian Duo ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY AND GEOPHYSICS   (China)

Author keywords

Boundary layer conductance; Integrated model; Photosynthesis; Stomatal conductance; Transpiration

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001263172     PISSN: 05777496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Norman J. Scaling processes between leaf and canopy level. In: Ehleringer J R, Field C B eds. Scaling Physiological Processes. London: Academic Press, 1993.
2. Jarvis P G. Scaling processes and problems. Plant Cell Environ, 1995,18:1079-1089
3. Cowan I R. Stomatal behavior and environment. Adv Bot Res, 1977, 4:117-228
4. 2 on stomatal dynamics. J Theor Biol, 1983, 101:415-440
5. Fu W, Wang TD. Eflects of boundary layer conductance on leaf gas exchange. Acta Bot Sin, 1994,36:614-621 (in Chinese)
6. Ball J T, Woodrow I E, Berry J A. A model predicting stomatal conductance and its contribution to the control of photosynthesis under different environmental conditions. In: J Biggins ed. Progress in Photosynthesis Research. Vol. 4. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987. 221-234
7. Vogel C, Baldocchi D D, Luhar A K, Rao K S. A comparison of a hierarchy of models for determining energy balance components over vegetation canopies. J Appl Meteorol, 1995,34:2182-2196
8. Leuning R. Modeling stomatal behavior and photosynthesis of Eucalyptus grandis. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1990,17:159-175
9. Collatz G J, Ball J T, Grivet C, Berry J A. Physiological and environmental regulation of stomatal conductance, photosynthesis and transpiration: a model that includes a laminar boundary layer. Agric For Meteorol, 1991, 54:107-136
10. 4 plants. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1992,19:519-538
11. Fu W, Wang T D. A mechanistic model of stomatal responses to environmental factors. Acta Phytophysiol Sin, 1994, 20: 277 -284 (in Chinese)
12. 2 on plants: extrapolating leaf response to a canopy. Agric For Meteorol, 1992,61:69-94
13. Shi J Z, Wang T D. Experimental study and mathematical simulation of water use efficiency in wheat leaves affected by some environmental factors. Acta Bot Sin, 1994, 36:940-946 (in Chinese)
14. 3 plants. Plant Cell Environ, 1995,18:339-355
15. 2 and water vapor in the air. Plant Cell Environ, 1993, 16:771-783
16. Hall A E. Mathematical models of plant water loss and plant water relations. In: Lange O L, Nobel P S, Osmond C B, Ziegler H eds. Physiological Plant Ecology II , Water Relations and Carbon Assimilation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1982.
17. Jarvis P G. The interpretation of the variations in water potential and stomatal conductance found in canopies in the field. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lodon (Ser B), 1976, 273:593-610
18. Wong S C, Cowan I R, Farquhar G D. Stomatal conductance correlates with photosynthetic capacity. Nature, 1979, 282:424 -426
19. Farquhar G D, Sharkey T D. Stomatal conductance and photosynthesis. Annu Rev Plant Physiol, 1982, 33:317-345
20. Mott K A, Parkhurst D F. Stomatal responses to humidity in air and helox. Plant Cell Environ, 1991,14:509-515
21. Aphalo P J, Jarvis P G. Do stomata respond to relative humidity? Plant Cell Environ, 1991, 14:127-132
22. 3 species. Planta, 1980,149:78-90
23. von Caemmerer S, Farquhar G D. Some relationship between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta, 1981,153:376-387
24. Schuepp P H. Transley review No. 59: leaf boundary layers. New Phytol, 1993, 125:477-507
25. Comstock J, Ehleringer J. Stomatal response to humidity in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris): implications for maximum transpiration rate, water-use efficiency and productivity. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1993, 20:669-691
26. Schulze E-D, Turner N C, Gollan T, Shackel K A. Stomatal responses to air humidity and to soil drought. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G D, Cowan I R eds. Stomatal Function. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987. 311-321
27. 2. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G D, Cowan I R eds. Stomatal Function. Stanford:Stanford University Press, 1987. 229-251
28. Farquhar G D. Feedforward responses of stomata to humidity. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1978, 5:787-800
29. Monteith J L. A reinterpretation of stomatal responses to humidity. Plant Cell Environ, 1995, 18:357-364
30. Jarvis P G. Stomatal response to water stress in conifers. In: Turner N C, Kramer P J eds. Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature stress. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1980. 105-122
31. 2 during ontogeny. Plant Physiol, 1985, 78: 821-825
32. 2 assimilation, II. effects of short-term exposures to different photon flux densities. Plant Physiol, 1985,78:826-829
33. 2 assimilation, III. influence of water stress and photoinhibition. Plant Physiol, 1985,78:830-834
34. Sharkey T D. Stomatal responses to light. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar G D, Cowan I R eds. Stomatal Function. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1987.
35. Morison J I L, Jarvis P G. Direct and indirect effects of light on stomata, II. In Commelina communis L. Plant Cell Environ, 1983, 6:103-109
36. 2 by plants. Plant Cell Environ, 1990, 13:731-737
37. Sharkey T D, Raschke K. Separation and measurement of direct and indirect effects of light on stomata. Plant Physiol, 1981, 68:33-40
38. Raschke K. How stomata resolve the dilemma of opposing priorities. Phil Trans Roy Soc (Ser B), 1976, 273:551-560
39. Dubbe D R, Farguhar G D, Raschke K. Effect of abscisic acid on the gain of feedback loop involving carbon dioxide and stomata. Plant Physiol, 1978, 62:413-417
40. Morison J I L, Gifford R M. Stomatal sensitivity to carbon dioxide and humidity. Plant Physiol 1983,71:789-796
41. 2 and temperature with water use efficiency. Plant Cell Environ, 1991, 14:843-582
42. Tenhunen J D, Sala A, Dougherty R L. Factors influencing carbon fixation and water use by Mediterranean sclerophyll shrubs during summer drought. Oecologia, 1990, 63:330-342
43. 2 concentrations: Has its importance be underestimated? Plant Cell Environ, 1991, 14:729-739
44. 2 concentrations, II. Plant dry weight, partitioning and water use efficiency. Aust J Plant Physiol, 1984,11:375-384
45. 2. Plant Cell Environ, 1992,15:217-202