A new method for comparing ontogenetic and phylogenetic data and its application to the evolution of the crocodilian secondary palate

Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie und Palaontologie - Abhandlungen

Volumn 210, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 345-368

  Larsson, Hans C E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROCODILIAN; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; ONTOGENY; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 0001230985     PISSN: 00777749     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1127/njgpa/210/1998/345     Document Type: Review

References (46)

1. ALBERCU, P. (1982): Developmental constraints in evolutionary process. In: BONNER, J. T. (Ed.): Evolution and Development; 313-332; Berlin (Springer).
2. ALBERCH, P., GOULD, S. J., OSTER, J. F. & WAKE, D. B. (1979): Size and shape in ontogeny and phylogeny. - Paleobio., 5 (3): 296-317.
3. ATCHLEY, W. R. (1987): Developmental quantitative genetics and the evolution of ontogenies. - Evol., 41 (2): 316-330.
4. BONNER, J. T. (Ed.). (1982): Evolution and development. - 356 pp.; Berlin (Springer-Verlag).
5. BONNET, C. (1769): La Palingénése Philosophique, 2 vols.; Geneva (C. Philibert and B. Chirol).
6. BROCHU, C. A. (1997a): Morphology, fossils, divergence timing, and the phylogenetic relationships of Gavialis. - Syst. Biol., 46 (3): 479-522.
7. _ (1997b): A review of "Leidyosuchus" (Crocodyliformes, Eusuchia) from the Cretaceous through Eocene of North America. - J. Vert. Paleont., 17 (4): 679-697.
8. BROOKS, D. R. & WILEY, E. O. (1985. Theories and methods in different approaches to phylogenetic systematics. Cladistics, 1: 1-11.
9. CLARK, J. M. (1994): Patterns of evolution in Mesozoic Crocodyliformes. - In: FRASER, N. C. & SUES, H.-D. (Eds.): In the Shadow of the Dinosaurs: Early Mesozoic Tetrapods: 84-97; Cambridge and New York (Cambridge University Press).
10. DE BEER, G. S. (1937): The Development of the Vertebrate Skull. - 554 pp.; Chicago (University of Chicago Press).
11. DE QUEIROZ, K. (1985): The ontogenetic method for determining character polarity and its relevance to phylogenetic systematics. - Syst. Zool., 34 (3): 208-299.
12. DINGERKUS, G. & UHLER, L. D. (1977): Enzyme clearing of Alcian blue stained whole small vertebrates for demonstration of cartilage. - Stain Tech., 52: 229-232.
13. EUDES-DESLONGCHAMPS, E. (1868) [1869]: Observations faites sur le foetus de caiman à museau de brochet et constation d'un fait très important dans l'anatomie des crocodiles. - Bull. de la Soc. Linn. Norm., 2e sér 3: 222-225.
14. FERGUSON, M. W. J. (1981): The structure and development of the palate in Alligator mississippiensis. - Arch. Oral Biol., 26: 427-443.
15. _ (1985): Reproductive biology and embryology of the crocodilians. - In: GANS, C., BILLETT, F. & MADERSON, P. F. A. (Eds.): Biology of the Reptilia; 329-491; London (Academic Press).
16. GARSTANG, W. (1922): The theory of recapitulation. A critical restatement of the biogenetic law. - Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 35: 81-101.
17. GOODRICH, E. S. (1930): Studies on the Structure and Development of Vertebrates. - 837 pp.; London (Macmillan and Company).
18. GOULD, S. J. (1977): Ontogeny and Phylogeny. - 501 pp.; Cambridge (Harvard University Press).
19. HALLER, A. V. (1758): Sur la Formation du Coeur dans le Poulet. Lausanne.; Bousquet (Marc-Michel).
20. HARVEY, W. (1628) [1847]: An anatomical desquisition on the motion of the heart and blood in animals. - Translated with introduction by WILLIS, R.: The works of William Harvey; - 624 pp.; London (Sydenham Society).
21. _ (1651) [1981]: Disputations Touching the Generation of Animals. - Translated with introduction and notes by WHITTERIDGE, G. - 502 pp.; New York (Blackwell).
22. HULKE, J. W. (1878): Note on two skulls from the Wealden and Purbech Formations indicating a new subgroup of Crocodilia. - Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 134: 377-382.
23. Huxley, T. H. (1875): On Stagonolepis robertsoni, and the evolution of the Crocodilia. - Quart. J. Geol. Soc. London, 31: 423-438.
24. KALIN, J. A. (1933): Beiträge zur vergleichenden Osteologie des Crocodilidenschädels. - Zoologische Jahrbücher, Abteilung für Anatomie und Ontogenie der Tiere, 57: 535-714.
25. KLUGE, A. G. (1985): Ontogeny and phylogenetic systematics. - Cladistics, 1: 13-27.
26. KRAUS, F. (1988): An empirical evaluation of the use of the ontogeny polarization criterion in phylogenetic inference. - Syst. Zool., 37: 106-141.
27. LANGSTON, W. Jr. (1973): The crocodilian skull in historical perspective. - In: GANS, C. & PARSONS, T. S. (Eds.): Biology of the Reptilia; 263-284; London (Academic Press).
28. MABEE, P. M. (1993): Phylogenetic interpretation of ontogenetic change: sorting out the actual and artefactual in an empiracal case study of centrarchid fishes. - Zool. J. Linn. Soc., 107: 175-291.
29. MADDISON, D. R. (1991): The discovery and importance of multiple islands of mostparsimonious trees. - Syst. Zool., 40 (3): 315-328.
30. MC KINNEY, M. L. (1988): Heterochrony in Evolution: a multidisciplinary approach. - 348 pp.; New York (Plenum Press).
31. MCKINNEY, M. L. & MCNAMARA, K. J. (1991): Heterochrony: the evolution of ontogeny. - 437 pp.; New York (Plenum Press).
32. NELSON, G. J. (1978): Ontogeny, phylogeny, paleontology, and the biogenetic law. -Syst. Zool., 27: 324-345.
33. NORELL, M. A. (1988): Cladistic approaches to paleobiology as applied to the phylogeny of alligatorids. Ph. D. Dissertation, Yale University.
34. OWEN, R. (1848): On the archetype and homologies of the vertebrate skeleton. - 203 pp.; London (John van Voorst).
35. PATTERSON, C. (1982): Morphological characters and homology. - In: JOYSEY, K. A. & FRIDAY, A. E. (Eds.): Prolems of Phylogenetic Reconstruction; 21-74; New York (Academic Press).
36. RIEPPEL, O. (1979): Ontogeny and the recognition of primitive character states. - Z. zool. Syst. Evol., 17: 57-61.
37. _ (1985): Ontogeny and the hierarchy of types. - Cladistics, 1 (3): 234-246.
38. _ (1988): Fundamentals of Comparative Biology; 202 pp.; Basel and Boston (Birkhäuser Verlag).
39. RUPKE, N. A. (1993): Richard Owen's vertebrate archtype. - Isis, 84: 231-251.
40. SHIINO, K. (1914): Studien zur Kenntnis des Wirbeltierkopfes. 1. Das Chondrocranium von Crocodilus, mit Berücksichtigung der Gehirnnerven und der Kopfgefässe. - Anat. Hefte 50: 254-381.
41. SWOFFORD, D. & BEGLE, D. P. (1993): Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony, Version 3.1.1.; Washington (Smithsonian Institution).
42. VON BAER, K. E. (1828): Ueber Entwicklungsgeschichte der Thiere. Beobachtung und Reflexion. 1. Theil. Königsberg (Gebrüder Borntraeger).
43. WAGNER, G. P. (1989): The origin of morphological characters and the biological basis of homology. - Evolution, 43 (6): 1157-1171.
44. WHEELER, Q. D. (1990): Ontogeny and character phylogeny. - Cladistics, 6: 225-268.
45. WIMSATT, W. C. (1986): Developmental constraints, generative entrenchment and the innate-acquired distinction. - In: BECHTEL, W. (Ed.): Integrating Scientific Disciplines; 185-208; Dordrecht (Martinus Nijhofff).
46. WU, X.-C., H.-D. SUES & DONG, Z.-M. (1997): Sichuanosuchus shuhanensis, a new ?Early Cretaceous protosuchian (Archosauria: Crocodyliformes) from Sichuan (China), and the monophyly of Protosuchia. - J. Vert. Paleont., 17 (1): 89-103.