Effective Lagrangians and parity-conserving time-reversal violation at low energies

Physical Review D - Particles, Fields, Gravitation and Cosmology

Volumn 53, Issue 9, 1996, Pages 5112-5114

  Engel, Jonathan ^a   Frampton, Paul H ^a   Springer, Roxanne P ^b  

^a University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001229617     PISSN: 15507998     EISSN: 15502368     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.53.5112     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. M. Kobayashi and K. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 49, 652 (1973).
2. See Time Reversal Invariance and Parity Violation in Neutron Reactions, edited by C.R. Gould, D. Bowman, and Y.P. Popov (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994), and references therein.
3. N.K. Cheung, H.E. Henrikson and F. Boehm, Phys. Rev. C 24, 620 (1981).
4. J.E. Koster, et al., Phys. Lett. B 267, 23 (1991).
5. E. Blanke, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 355 (1983).
6. A.L. Hallin, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 337 (1984).
7. M. Simonius, Phys. Lett. 58B, 147 (1975).
8. J. Engel, C.R. Gould and V. Hnizdo, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 3508 (1994).
9. W.C. Haxton, A. Höring and M. Musolf, Phys. Rev. D 50, 3422 (1994).
10. P. Herczeg, J. Kambor, M. Simonius, and D. Wyler (unpublished).
11. R.S. Conti and I.B. Khriplovich, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 3262 (1992).
12. K. Symanzik, Commun. Math. Phys. 34, 7 (1973);
13. S. Weinberg, Phys. Lett. 91B, 51 (1980);
14. H. Georgi, Weak Interactions and Modern Particle Theory (Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, CA, 1984);
15. for a review, seeH. Georgi, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 43, 209 (1993).
16. A. Manohar and H. Georgi, Nucl. Phys. B234, 189 (1984);
17. H. Georgi and L. Randall, Nucl. Phys. B276, 241 (1986);
18. H. Georgi, Phys. Lett. B 298, 187 (1993).
19. Particle Data Group, L. Montanet, et al., Phys. Rev. D 50, 1173 (1994).
20. P. Herczeg, J. Kambor, M. Simonius, and D. Wyler are currently analyzing a model with a light boson [P. Herczeg (private communication)].
21. One that might appear to be relevant is ψ-|Amψ (formula presented) (formula presented) (formula presented)(formula presented) ψ+H.c., where (formula presented) is the gluon field-strength tensor and the (formula presented) ‘s are SU(3) color matric es. However, the equations of motion (formula presented) (formula presented)ψ=mψ can be used to show that the operator vanishes up to a surface te rm. This statement, which remains true with the addition of a (formula presented), implies that not all of the 81 dimension-six standard-model operators inW. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B268, 621 (1987);
22. W. Buchmüller, B. Lampe and N. Vlachos, Phys. Lett. B 197, 379 (1987) are independent;
23. the 10 involving fermions and vectors can be reduced up to a surface term through equations of motion (with Higgs scalars instead of explicit masses) to one of the operators involving &ψ
24. (formula presented) (formula presented), a field strength tensor, and a Higgs scalar.
25. C. P. Burgess and D. London, Phys. Rev. D 48, 4337 (1993).
26. I.B. Khriplovich, Nucl. Phys. B352, 385 (1991).
27. This operator was pointed out to us by D. Kaplan.
28. K.F. Smith, et al., Phys. Lett. B 234, 191 (1990).
29. I.S. Altarev, et al., Phys. Lett. B 276, 242 (1992).