Electroweak symmetry breaking and the higgs sector

Acta Physica Polonica B

Volumn 30, Issue 7, 1999, Pages 2145-2192

  Quigg, Chris ^a  

^a FERMI NATIONAL ACCELERATOR LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001211152     PISSN: 05874254     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. M. Veltman, Reflections on the Higgs System, CERN-97-05.
2. P. Fayet, The Standard Model and beyond. http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812300.
3. C. Quigg, Hadron Colliders, the Top Quark, and the Higgs Sector, in Advanced School on Electroweak Theory, edited by D. Espriu and A. Pich, World Scientific, Singapore 1998, p. 115, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9707508.
4. J. Ellis, Beyond the Standard Model for Hill Walkers, lectures presented at 1998 European School of High-Energy Physics, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812235.
5. M. Spira, P. Zerwas, Electroweak Symmetry Breaking and Higgs Physics, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9803257.
6. S. Dawson, Introduction to Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, lectures given at the 1998 Summer School in High Energy Physics and Cosmology, Trieste, Italy, June 29-July 17, 1998, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9901280.
7. D.I. Kazakov, The Higgs boson: shall we see it soon or is it still far away?, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9905330.
8. For textbook treatments of the electroweak theory, see C. Quigg, Gauge Theories of the Strong, Weak, and Electromagnetic Interactions, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1983;
9. T.-P. Cheng L.-F. Li, Gauge Theory of Elementary Particle Physics, Oxford University Press, Oxford 1984;
10. I.J.R. Aitchison, A.J.G. Hey, Gauge Theories in Particle Physics: A Practical Introduction, second edition, Adam Hilger, Bristol 1989.
11. M. Herrero, The Standard Model, lectures presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute, Techniques and Concepts of High Energy Physics, St. Croix, June 18-29 1998, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812242.
12. M.K. Gaillard, P.D. Grannis, F.J. Sciulli, The Standard Model of Particle Physics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 71, S96 (1999), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812285,
13. included in More Things in Heaven and Earth: A Celebration of Physics at the Millennium, edited by B. Bederson, Springer-Verlag, New York 1999, p. 161.
14. V.L. Ginzburg, L.D. Landau, Zh. Eksp. Tear. Fiz. 20, 1064 (1950);
15. English translation: Men of Physics: Landau, Vol. I, edited by D. ter Haar, Pergamon, New York 1965, p. 138.
16. P.W. Higgs, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12,132 (1964). The parallel between electroweak symmetry breaking and the Ginzburg-Landau theory is drawn carefully in
17. R.E. Marshak, Conceptual Foundations of Modern Particle Physics, World Scientific, Singapore 1993, §4.4. For a rich discussion of superconductivity as a consequence of the spontaneous breaking of electromagnetic gauge symmetry, see
18. Steven Weinberg, The Quantum Theory of Fields, vol. 2, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 1996, §21.6.
19. The transparencies and web-based Proceedings for DPF99 can be found at http://www.physics.ucla.edu/dpf99J.
20. For a summary and interpretation, see W.J. Marciano, Precision Electroweak Measurements and New Physics, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9902332.
21. D. Karlen, Experimental status of the Standard Model, plenary address at the XXIX International Conference on High Energy Physics, Vancouver, transparencies available at http://ichep98.triumf.ca. The latest versions of the LEP Electroweak Working Group plots may be found at http://www.cern.ch/LEPEWWG/plotsJ.
22. J. Erler, P. Langacker, Status of the Standard Model, to appear in the Proceedings of the 5th International WEIN Symposium: A Conference on Physics beyond the Standard Model (WEIN 98), Santa Fe, NM, June 14-21, 1998, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9809352.
23. T. van Ritbergen, R. Stuart, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 488 (1999).
24. S.C. Bennett, C.E. Wieman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 2484 (1999), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ex/9903022.
25. A timeline of top masses inferred from precision electroweak measurements, unsuccessful searches, and direct observations appears as figure 1 of C. Quigg, Tbp-ology, expanded version of an article published in Phys. Today 50, 20 (May 1997), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9704332.
26. The fascinating history of photon mass measurements is reviewed in many places, including A.S. Goldhaber, M.M. Nieto, Rev. Mod. Phys. 43, 1277 (1991);
27. Set . Am. 234, 86 (May, 1976);
28. I.Yu. Kobzarev, L.B. Okun, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 95, 131 (1968),
29. English translation: Sov. Phys.-Uspekhi 11, 338 (1968);
30. 2, is given by
31. 2, has been inferred from the stability of the Magellanic clouds, as discussed by
32. G.V. Chibisov, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 119, 551 (1976),
33. English translation: Sov. Phys.-Uspekhi 19, 624 (1976).
34. B.W. Lee, C. Quigg, H.B. Thacker, Phys. Rev. DIG, 1519 (1977). For a somewhat different approach that leads to similar constraints on the mass of the Higgs boson,
35. see M. Veltman, Acta Phys. Pol. B8, 475 (1977).
36. W/√δ) The equivalence theorem can be traced to the work of J.M. Cornwall, D.N. Levin, G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. D10, 1145 (1974); Phys. Rev. DU, 972E (1975). It was applied to this problem by Lee, Quigg, and Thacker, Ref. [21], and developed extensively by Chanowitz and Gaillard, Réf. [23], and others.
37. See, for example, M. Chanowitz, M.K. Gaillard, Nucl. Phys. B261, 279 (1985);
38. M. Chanowitz, M. Golden, H. Georgi, Phys. Rev. D36,1490 (1987);
39. Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 2344 (1986).
40. K.G. Wilson, Phys. Rev. D3, 1818 (1971);
41. Phys. Rev. B4, 3184 (1971);
42. K.G. Wilson, J. Kogut, Phys. Rep. 12, 76 (1974).
43. For a review, see Urs M. Heller, Nucl. Phys. B (Proc. Supp.) 34, 101 (1994), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-lat/9311058. The numerical analysis that leads to these conclusions is reported in Urs M. Heller, et al., Nucl. Phys. B405, 555 (1993), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9303215.
44. Lower bounds on the Higgs mass date from the work of A.D. Linde, Zh. Eksp. Tear. Fiz. Pis'ma Red. 23, 73 (1976),
45. English translation: JETP Lett. 23, 64 (1976);
46. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 36, 294 (1976). For a review of lower bounds deduced from the requirement of vacuum stability of electroweak potentials, see
47. 2), see
48. G. Altarelli, G. Isidori, Phys. Lett. B337, 141 (1994);
49. J. Espinosa, M. Quiros, Phys. Lett. B353, 257 (1995).
50. See, for example, J.A. Casas, J.R. Espinosa, M. Quirôs, A. Riotto, Nucl. Phys. B43G, 3 (1995);
51. Y.F. Pirogov, O.V. Zenin, Two-loop renormaliza-tion group restrictions on the standard model and the fourth chiral family, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9808396.
52. L. Maiani, G. Parisi, R. Petronzio, Nucl. Phys. B136, 115 (1978).
53. Two early studies provide valuable introductions to a light Higgs boson. See J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, D.V. Nanopoulos, Nttcl. Phys. B106, 292 (1976); A.I. Vainshtein, V.I. Zakharov, M.A. Shifman, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 131, 537 (1980), English translation: Sov. Phys.-Uspekhi 23, 429 (1980). For a first look at the properties of a heavy Higgs boson, see Lee, Quigg, and Thacker, Ref. [21].
54. A useful general reference is J.F. Gunion, H.E. Haber, G.L. Kane, S. Dawson, The Higgs Hunter's Guide, Addison-Wesley, Redwood City, California 1990.
55. B.L. loffe, V.A. Khoze, Sov. J. Part. Nucl. 9, 50 (1978); Lee, Quigg, Thacker, Ref. [21].
56. This is a preliminary indication based on analysis of data recorded at √s = 189 GeV. Consult the Presentations at the LEPC Physics Jamboree on March 24, 1999 by ALEPH http://alephwww.cern.ch/ALPUB/seminar/lepc_mar99.ps, DELPHI http://delphiwww.cern.ch/delfigs/figures/vanina981112.ps.gz, L3 http://l3www.cern.ch/conferences/ps/Clare_LEPC9811.ps.gz, and OPAL http://www.cern.ch/0pal/plots/plane/lepc98.html. The combined limit is likely to be a few GeV/c2 higher than the limits from individual experiments.
57. For an assessment of the prospects for discovering and determining the mass of a light Higgs boson, see J.F. Gunion, L. Poggioli, R. Van Kooten, C. Kao, P. Rowson, et ai, Higgs boson discovery and properties, Snowmass '96, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9703330.
58. M. Krämer, J. Kühn, M.L. Stong, P.M. Zerwas, Z. Phys. C64, 21 (1994), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9404280.
59. H. Murayama, M.E. Peskin, Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 46, 533 (1996), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ex/9606003.
60. E. Accomando, et al. (ECFA/DESY LC Physics Working Group Collaboration), Phys. Rep. 299, 1 (1998), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9705442.
61. See, for example, V. Barger, M.S. Berger, J.F. Gunion, T. Han, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1462 (1995); 78, 3991 1997; David B. Cline, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, 183 (1998).
62. M. Demarteau, T. Han, Higgs Boson and Z Physics at the First Muon Collider, in Workshop on Physics at the First Muon Collider and Front End of a Muon Collider, edited by S. Geer and R. Raja, AIP Conference Proceedings 435, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY 1998, p. 177, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9801407. See also B. Kamal, W.J. Marciano, Z. Parsa, Higgs Resonance Studies at the First Muon Collider, ibid., p. 657 http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9712270.
63. C. Ankenbrandt, S. Geer, Accelerator Scenario and Parameters, in Workshop on Physics at the First Muon Collider and Front End of a Muon Collider, edited by S. Geer and R. Raja, AIP Conference Proceedings 435, American Institute of Physics, Woodbury, NY, 1998, p. 3 (FERMILAB-CONF-98/086, available at http://www-lib.fnal.gov/archive/1998/conf/Conf-98-086.html). A status report from the International Muon Collider Collaboration, to be published in http://prst-ab.aps.Org/P/iys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams, is available at http://www.cap.bnl.gov/mumu/status_report.html.
64. The overall radiation environment is similar to that of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN. For an imaginative proposal to deal with the flux of soft photons, see J. Chapman, S. Geer, The Pixel Microtelescope, FERMILABCONF-96/375, Snowmass '96, available at http://www-lib.fnal.gov/archive/1996/conf/Conf-96-375.html.
65. Michael Spira, Higgs boson production and decay at the Tevatron, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9810289.
66. F. Abe, et al. (CDF Collaboration), Observation of Z decays to 6-quark pairs at the Tevatron collider, contributed paper to the 29th International Conference on High-Energy Physics (ICHEP 98), Vancouver, July 23-30, 1998, FERMILAB-CONF-98/197-E, available at http://www-lib.fnal.gov/archive/1998/conf/Conf-98-197-E.html.
67. A. Stange, W. Marciano, S. Willenbrook, Phys. Rev. D49, 1354 (1994); Phys. Rev. D50, 4491 (1994).
68. Work carried out in the context of the Tevatron Run II Supersymmetry/Higgs Workshop at Fermilab may be found at http://fnth37.fnal.gov/susy.html.
69. Tao Han, André Turcot, Ren-Jie Zhang, Phys. Rev. D59, 093001 (1999), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812275.
70. Tao Han, private communication.
71. The ATLAS Technical Proposal can be retrieved from ftp://www.cern.ch /pub/Atlas/TP/tp.html. The CMS Technical Proposal is available at http://cmsinfo.cern.ch/TP/TP.html.
72. M. Dittmar, Searching for the Higgs and other Exotic Objects: A 'How to' Guide from LEP to the LHC, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ex/9901009.
73. For a cogent summary of current knowledge of the cosmological parameters, including evidence for a cosmological constant, see M.S. Turner, Cosmological Parameters, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/astro-ph/9904051.
74. For a useful summary of gravitational theory, see §14 of the 1998 Review of Particle Physics, Eur. Phys. J. C3, 1 (1998).
75. M. Veltman, Phys. Rev. Lett. 34, 111 (1975).
76. A.D. Linde, JETP Lett. 19, 183 (1974).
77. J. Dreitlein, Phys. Rev. Lett. 33, 1243 (1977).
78. S. Weinberg, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 1 (1989).
79. J. van der Bij, Int. J. Phys. 1, 63 (1995), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9507389.
80. M. Veltman, Acta Phys. Pol. B12, 437 (1981); C.H. Llewellyn Smith, Phys. Rep. 105, 53 (1984).
81. I will not discuss this alternative further. See M.S. Chanowitz, Strong WW scattering at the end of the 90's: Theory and experimental prospects, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812215.
82. D. Treille, Acta Phys. Pol. B30, 2193 (1999).
83. For an approachable introduction, see Joseph D. Lykken, Introduction to Supersymmetry, in Fields, Strings, and Duality: TASI 96, edited by C. Efthimiou and B. Greene, World Scientific, Singapore 1997, p. 85, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9612114.
84. S.P. Martin, A Supersymmetry Primer, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9709356, latest version available at http://zippy.physics.niu.edu/primer.shtml.
85. S. Dawson, The MSSM and Why It Works, in Supersymmetry, Supergravity and Supercolliders: TASI 97, edited by J. Bagger, World Scientific, Singapore 1999, p. 261, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9712464.
86. J. Erler, D.M. Pierce, Nttcl. Phys. B526, 53 (1998), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9801238.
87. See, for example, W. de Boer et al., Updated global fits of the SM and MSSM to electroweak precision data, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9609209.
88. For a fuller development of the influence of standard-model parameters on the everyday world, see R.N. Cahn, Rev. Mod. Phys. 68, 951 (1996).
89. F. Dyson, J. Math. Phys. 8, 1538 (1967).
90. E.H. Lieb, Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 22, 1 (1990).
91. F. Quevedo, lectures on Superstring Phenomenology, in Proceedings of the Fifth Mexican Workshop of Particles and Fields and Phenomenology of Fundamental Interactions, Puebla, Mexico, edited by Juan Carlos D'Olivo, Arturo Fernandez, Miguel A. Perez, American Inst. Phys., New York, 1996, AIP Conference Proceedings 359, p. 202-242, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9603074.
92. J.G. Polchinski, String Theory, two volumes, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge 1998.
93. I. Antoniadis, Phys. Lett. B246, 377 (1990).
94. J.D. Lykken, Phys. Rev. D54, 3693 (1996), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9603133.
95. N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, Phys. Lett. B429, 263 (1998), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9803315.
96. K.R. Dienes, E. Dudas, T. Gherghetta, Phys. Lett. B436, 55 (1998), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9803466.
97. J. Scherk, J.H. Schwarz, Nucl. Phys. B81, 118 (1974).
98. L. Arnaudon, et al., 1993 IEEE Particle Accelerator Conference: Proceedings, p. 44.
99. M. Caréna et al, Higgs physics at LEP 2, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-th/9602250; included in Report of the Workshop on Physics at LEP 2, Vol. 1, edited by G. Altarelli, T. Sjostrand, and F. Zwirner, CERN 96-01.
100. M. Caréna, J. R. Espinosa, M. Quirôs, C. E. Wagner, Phys. Lett. B355, 209 (1995), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9504316.
101. The case for dynamical symmetry breaking is made eloquently by K. Lane, Nonsupersymmetric Extensions of the Standard Model, in Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on High Energy Physics, edited by Z. Ajduk and A.K. Wroblewski, World Scientific, Singapore 1997, p. 367, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9610463.
102. R.S. Chivukula, An Introduction to Dynamical Electroweak Symmetry Breaking, in Advanced School on Electroweak Theory, edited by D. Espriu and A. Pich, World Scientific, Singapore 1998, p. 77, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9701322.
103. "Topcolor" is another approach to dynamical symmetry breaking that is inspired by the BCS theory. The strong coupling of a heavy top quark to the Higgs boson raises the possibility that the breaking of electroweak symmetry may be intimately linked with the top quark. For explicit implementations of this idea, see W.A. Bardeen, C.T. Hill, M. Lindner, Phys. Rev. D41, 1647 (1990); Y. Nambu, in New Trends in Strong Coupling Gauge Theories, edited by M. Bando, T. Muta, K. Yamawaki, World Scientific, Singapore 1989, p 3; Y. Nambu, in New Theories in Physics, edited by Z. Ajduk, S. Pokorski, A. Trautman, World Scientific, Singapore 1989, p. 1; V.A. Miransky, M. Tanabashi, K. Yamawaki, Mod. Phys. Lett. A4, 1043 (1989); Phys. Lett. B221, 177 (1989); W.J. Marciano, Phys. Rev. D41, 219 (1990).
104. J. Bardeen, L. N. Cooper, J. R. Schrieffer, Phys. Rev. 106, 162 (1962).
105. Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 380 (1960).
106. M. Weinstein, Phys. Rev. D8, 2511 (1973).
107. S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. D13, 974 (1976), Phys. Rev. D19, 1277 (1979).
108. L. Susskind, Phys. Rev. D20, 2619 (1979).
109. E. Eichten, K. Lane, Phys. Lett. 90B, 125 (1980); S. Dimopoulos, L. Susskind, Nucl. Phys. B155, 237 (1979).
110. Some complicated examples have been offered of models that avoid the particle-content catastrophe. See, for example, B. Dobrescu, E.H. Simmons, Phys. Rev. D59, 015014 (1999), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9807469.
111. The idea of high-scale, or "walking," extended technicolor developed from the ideas in B. Holdom, Phys. Rev. D24, 1441 (1981), Phys. Lett. B150, 301 (1985); T. Appelquist, D. Karabali, L.C. R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 957 (1986); T. Appelquist, L.C.R. Wijewardhana, Phys. Rev. D36, 568 (1987); K. Tamawaki, M. Bando, K. Matumoto, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 1335 (1986); T. Akiba, T. Yanagida, Phys. Lett. B169, 69 (1980). For a recent review of these ideas, see R.S. Chivukula, Avenues for Dynamical Symmetry Breaking, presented at the Thirteenth Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics, Mumbai, 14-20 January 1999, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9903500.
112. E. Eichten, K. Lane, J. Womersley, Phys. Lett. B405, 305 (1997).
113. A.J. Buras, J. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard, D.V. Nanopoulos, Nucl. Phys. B135, 66 (1978).
114. The one-loop renormalization-group equations were first done for large top Higgs-Yukawa couplings in B. Pendleton, G. Ross, Phys. Lett. B98, 291 (1981); C.T. Hill, Phys. Rev. D24, 691 (1981). The first one-loop supersymmetric version of large Higgs-Yukawa couplings is J. Bagger, S. Dimopoulos, E. Masso, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 920 (1985). For further references to multiloop calculations, see W.A. Bardeen, C.T. Hill, D. Jungnickel, Phys. Rev. D49, 1437 (1994).
115. G.W. Anderson, S. Raby, S. Dimopoulos, L.J. Hall, Phys. Rev. D47, 3702 (1993), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9209250.
116. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, A. Romanino, Precise tests of a quark mass texture, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9812384.
117. C.H. Albright, S.M. Barr, Phys. Lett. B452, 287 (1999), http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9901318.
118. T. Blazek, S. Raby, K. Tobe, Neutrino oscillations in a predictive SUSY GUT, http://xxx.lanl.gov/abs/hep-ph/9903340.