The influence of decision aids on user behavior: Implications for knowledge acquisition and inappropriate reliance

Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 1997, Pages 232-255

  Glover, Steven M ^a   Prawitt, Douglas F ^a   Spilker, Brian C ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001210347     PISSN: 07495978     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2735     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Abdolmohammadi M. Decision support and expert systems in auditing: A review and research direction. Accounting and Business Research. 1987, Spring;173-185.
2. Alter S. L. Current practice and continuing challenges. 1980;Addison-Welsey Publishing Company, Reading.
3. Arkes H. R., Dawes R. M., Christensen C. Factors influencing the use of a decision rule in a probabilistic task. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 37:1986;93-110.
4. Ashton R. H., Willingham J. J. Using and evaluating audit decision aids. Audit Symposium IX: Proceedings of the 1988 Touche Ross/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Procedures. 1988;University of Kansas. p. 1-25.
5. Ballew V. Technological routineness and intra unit structure in CPA firms. The Accounting Review. 1982;88-104.
6. Balzer W. K., Doherty M. E., O'Connor R. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin. 106:1989;410-433.
7. Bamber E. M., Bylinski J. The audit team and the audit review process: An organizational approach. Journal of Accounting Literature. 1:1982;33-58.
8. Bamber E. M., Snowball D. An experimental study of the effects of audit structure in uncertain task environments. The Accounting Review. 1988;490-504.
9. Beach L. R., Mitchell T. R. A contingency model for the selection of decision strategies. Academy of Management Review. 3:1978;439-449.
10. Bonner S. E., Walker P. L. Effects of instruction and experience on the acquisition of knowledge. The Accounting Review. 1994;157-178.
11. Chandler P., Sweller J. Cognitive load theory and format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction. 8:1991;292-332.
12. Cooper G., Sweller J. The effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology. 79:1987;347-362.
13. Dawes R. M., Faust D., Meehl P. E. Clinical versus actuarial judgment. Science. 1989, March;1688-1674.
14. Devine D. J., Kozlowski S. Domain-specific knowledge and task characteristics in decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 64:1995;294-306.
15. Einhorn H. J., Kleinmuntz D. N., Kleinmuntz B. Linear regression and process tracing models of judgment. Psychological Review. 86:1979;465-485.
16. Elam J. J., Mead M. Designing for creativity: Considerations for DSS design. Information and Management. 1987, December;215-222.
17. Elliott R., Jacobson P. Audit technology: A heritage and a promise. Journal of Accountancy. 1987, May;198-218.
18. Glaser R., Bassok M. Learning theory and the study of instruction. Annual Review of Psychology. 1989;636-666.
19. Goldberg L. R. Diagnosticians vs. diagnostic signs: the diagnosis of psychosis vs. neurosis from the MMPI. Psychological Monographs. 79:1965.
20. Goldberg L. R. Simple model or simple processes? Some research on clinical judgment. American Psychologist. 23:1968;483-496.
21. Harkins S. G., Petty R. E. Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 7:1982;627-635.
22. Hirst M. K., Luckett P. F. The relative effectiveness of different types of feedback in performance evaluation. Behavioral Research in Accounting. 4:1992;1-22.
23. Hermanson D. R. The effect of self-generated elaboration on students' recall of tax and accounting material: Further evidence. Issues in Accounting Education. 9:1994;301-318.
24. Jiambalvo J., Waller W. Decomposition and assessment of audit risk. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 1984, Spring;80-88.
25. Jungerman H. The two camps of rationality. Decision making under uncertainty. 1985;Elsevier Science Publishers, New York.
26. Kachelmeier S. J., Jones J. D., Keller J. A. Evaluating the effectiveness of a computer-intensive learning aid for teaching pension accounting. Issues in Accounting Education. 7:1992;164-178.
27. Kachelmeier S. J., Messier W. An investigation of the influence of a nonstatistical decision aid on auditor sample size decisions. The Accounting Review. 1990, January;209-226.
28. Keen P., Morton S. Decision support systems. 1978;Addison-Wesley, Reading.
29. Keisler C. A., Collins B., Miller N. Attitude change: A critical analysis of theoretical approaches. 1969;Wiley, New York.
30. Kottemann J. E., Davis F. D., Remus W. E. Computer-assisted decision making: Performance, beliefs, and the illusion of control. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 57:1994;26-37.
31. Kottemann J. E., Remus W. E. Evidence and principles of functional and dysfunctional decision support systems. International Journal of Management Science (Omega). 15:1987;135-144.
32. Kottemann J. E., Remus W. E. The effects of decision support systems on performance. Sol H. G., Vecsenyi J. Environments for supporting decision processes. 1991;203-214 North-Holland, New York.
33. Langer E. J. The illusion of control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 32:1975;311-328.
34. Lastovicka J., Gardner D. Components of involvement. Maloney J., Silverman B. Attitude research plays for high stakes. 1979;American Marketing Association, Chicago.
35. LeFevre J., Dixon P. Do written instructions need examples? Cognition and Instruction. 3:1986;1-30.
36. Libby R., Frederick D. M. Experience and the ability to explain audit findings. Journal of Accounting Research. 28:1990, Autumn;348-367.
37. Libby R., Luft J. Determinants of judgment performance in accounting settings: Ability, knowledge, motivation, and environment. Accounting, Organizations, and Society. 18:1993;425-450.
38. Libby R., Tan H. Modeling the determinants of audit expertise. Accounting, Organizations, and Society. 19:1994;701-716.
39. Mackay J. M., Barr S. H., Kletke M. G. An empirical investigation of the effects of decision aids on problem-solving processes. Decision Sciences. 23:1992;648-672.
40. March J. G. Bounded rationality, ambiguity and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics. 19:1978;587-608.
41. Mayer R. E. Can advance organizers influence meaningful learning? Review of Educational Research. 49:1979;371-383.
42. Mayer R. E. Elaboration techniques that increase the meaningfulness of technical test: An experimental test of the learning strategy hypothesis. Journal of Educational Psychology. 72:1980;770-784.
43. Messier W. Research in and development of audit decision aids. Ashton R. H., Ashton A. H. Judgment and decision making in accounting and auditing. 1995;207-228 Cambridge University Press.
44. Messier W., Hansen J. V. Expert systems in auditing: The state of the art. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory. 7:1987;94-105.
45. Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T. Issue-involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 37:1979;1915-1926.
46. Pincus K. V. The efficacy of a red flags questionnaire for assessing the possibility of fraud. Accounting, Organizations, & Society. 14:1989;153-163.
47. Payne J. W. Contingent decision behavior. Psychological Bulletin. 92:1982;382-402.
48. Prawitt D. F. Staffing assignments for judgment-oriented audit tasks: The effects of structured audit technology and environment. The Accounting Review. 1995;443-465.
49. Reigeluth C. M., Merrill M. D., Wilson B. G., Spiller R. T. The elaboration theory of instruction: A model for sequencing and synthesizing instruction. Instructional Science. 9:1980;195-215.
50. Remus W., Kottemann J. Toward intelligent decision support systems: An artificially intelligent statistician. MIS Quarterly. 1986, December;403-418.
51. Remus W., O'Connor M., Griggs K. Does feedback improve the accuracy of recurrent judgmental forecasts? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 1996, April;22-30.
52. Rennie M., Gibbins M. Expert beyond experience. CA Magazine. 1993;40-46.
53. Sherif C. W., Kelly M., Rodgers H. L., Sarup G., Tittler B. Personal involvement, social judgment, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 27:1973;311-327.
54. Silver M. S. Decision support systems: Directed and Nondirected Change. Information Systems Research. 1990, March;47-70.
55. Silver M. S. Decisional guidance for computer-based decision support. MIS Quarterly. 1991, March;105-122.
56. Simon H. A. Discussion: Cognition and social behaviour. Carroll J. S., Payne J. W. Cognition and social Behaviour. 1976;253-267 Earlbaum, Hillsdale.
57. Simon H. A. The new science of management decisions. 1977;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
58. Stabell C. B. A decision-oriented approach to building DSS. Bennett John L. Building decision support systems. 1983;221-260 Addision-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading.
59. Sullivan J. The case for the unstructured audit approach. Auditing Symposium VII: Proceedings of the 1984 Deloitte & Touche/University of Kansas Symposium on Auditing Problems. 1984;61-71.
60. Sweller J. Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science. 1:1988;257-285.
61. Sweller J. Cognitive technology: Some procedures for facilitating learning in problem solving in mathematics and science. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81:1989;457-466.
62. Todd P., Benbasat I. The impact of computer based decisions aids on the decision making process. Information Systems Research. 2:1991;87-115.
63. Todd P., Benbasat I. An experimental investigation of the impact of computer bases decision aids on processing effort. MIS Quarterly. 16:1992;373-393.
64. Todd P., Benbasat I. An experimental investigation of the relationship between decision makers, decision aids and decision making effort. Infor. 1993;80-99.
65. Todd P., Benbasat I. The influence of decision aids on choice strategies: An empirical analysis of the role of cognitive effort. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 60:1994;36-74.
66. Whitecotton, Stacey M. The effects of experience and a decision aid on the slope, scatter, and bias of earnings forecasts. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 66:1996;111-121.
67. Wynder M., Luckett P. The effects of understanding rules and a worked example on the acquisition of procedural knowledge and task performance. 1996;University of New South Wales.