Divide and conquer strategies in large scale dynamic process simulation

Computers and Chemical Engineering

Volumn 23, Issue SUPPL. 1, 1999, Pages

  Ehrhardt, Klaus ^a   Borchardt, Jürgen ^a   Grund, Friedrich ^a   Horn, Dietmar ^a  

^a WEIERSTRASS INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED ANALYSIS AND STOCHASTICS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Block partitioned systems; Block Broyden update methods; Distributed chemical process simulation; Parallelization; Systems of differential algebraic equations; Waveform iteration

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL PLANTS; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; ITERATIVE METHODS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

BROYDEN UPDATE; CHEMICAL PROCESS SIMULATION; DIFFERENTIAL ALGEBRAIC EQUATIONS; PARALLELIZATIONS; PARTITIONED SYSTEMS; WAVE FORMS;

ALGEBRA;

EID: 0001179309     PISSN: 00981354     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0098-1354(99)80082-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. AspenTech (1995). SPEEDUP. User Manual, Library Manual.AspenTechnology, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
2. Borchardt, J., Ehrhardt, K., Grund, E, and Horn, D. (1998). Parallel modular dynamic process simulation. WeierstraB-Institutfiir Angewandte Analysis und Stochastik, Preprint No. 439, Berlin.
3. Borchardt,J., Grund, E, Horn,D., and Michael,T. (1997). Parallelized numerical methods for large-scale dynamic process simulation. In Sydow, A., editor, Proceedings of the 15th IMACS World Congress 1997 on Scientific Computation, Modelling andApplied Mathematics, volume I, pages 547-552. Wissenschaft& Technik Verlag Berlin.
4. Briill,L. (1996). Simulation manager: Asoftware tool for process simulation in a heterogeneous hard- and software environment. SPEEDUP Journal, 10:51-53.
5. Grund, F. (1998). Direct linear solvers for vector and parallel computers. WeierstraB-Institut fiir Angcwandte Analysis und Stochastik, Preprint No. 415, Berlin.
6. Grund, F., Michael,T., Brüll, L., Hubbuch, E, Zeller, R., Borchardt, J., Horn, D., and Sandmann, H. (1997). Numerische LosunggroBerstrukturierter DAE-Systeme der chemischen ProzeBsimulation. In Hoffmann, K.-H., Jager, W., Lohmann,T., and Schunk, H., editors, Mathematik Schlüsseltechnologie für die Zukunft, pages 91-103. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
7. Gutschc, R. and Hartmann, K. (1996). Generalized criteria for predictingthe dynamicsof continuous-flowchemical systems. Chern. Engn. Scl., 51:3537-3549.
8. Helget, A. (1997). Modulare Simulation verfahrenstechnischer Anlagen. Fortschn-Ber: VDI Reihe 20 Nr. 251. DUsseldorf VDI Verlag.
9. Laganier, E S., Le Lann, 1.-M., Joulia, X., Koehret, 8., and Morari, M. (1993). Simultaneous modular dynamic simulation: Application to interconnected distillation columns. Compo Chern. Engn., 17:287-297.
10. Lelarasmee, E., Ruehli, A. E., and Sangiovanni-VincentelIi, A. L. (1982). The waveform relaxation method for time domain analysis of large scale integrated circuits. IEEE Trans. on CAD ofIC and Systems, 1:131-145.
11. Marwil, E. (1979). Convergence results for Schubert's method for solving sparse nonlinear equations. SlAM J. Numer. Anal., 16:588-604.
12. Schubert, L K. (1970). Modificationof a quasi-Newton method for nonlinear equations with a sparse Jacobian. Math. Comp., 24:27-30.
13. Yang, G., Dutto, L. c., and Fortin, M. (1997). Inexact block Jacobi-Broyden methods for solving nonlinear systems of equations.SIAMJ. Sci. Comput., 18:1367-1392.