Methadone clinic culture: The everyday realities of female methadone clients

Qualitative Health Research

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 121-139

  Fraser, James ^a,b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001144554     PISSN: 10497323     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104973239700700107     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Anglin, M., Hser, Y, & Booth, M. (1987). Sex differences in addict careers. Treatment. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 13(3), 253-280.
2. Bennett, L., & Lawson, M. (1994, May). Barriers to cooperation between domestic-violence and substance-abuse programs. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, pp. 277-286.
3. Bepko, C. (1991). Feminism and addiction. Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
4. Burman, S. (1992). A model for women's alcohol/drug treatment. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 9(2), 87-99.
5. Cuskey, W., Berger, L., & Densen-Berger, J. (1977). Issues in the treatment of female addiction: A review and critique of the literature. Contemporary Drug Problems, 6(3), 307-371.
6. Eldred, C., & Washington, M. (1975). Female heroin addicts in a city treatment program: The forgotten minority. Psychiatry, 38, 75-85.
7. Ettorre, E. (1992). Women and substance abuse. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
8. Ettorre, E. (1994). Women and drug abuse with special reference to Finland: Needing the "courage to see." Women's Studies International Forum, 17(1), 83-94.
9. Fleming, H. (1988). Public opinion on change in women's rights and roles. In S. M. Dornbusch & M. H. Strober (Eds.), Feminism, children, and the new families (pp. 46-66). New York: Guilford.
10. Forth-Finegan, J. (1991). Sugar and spice and everything nice: Gender socialization and women's addiction - A literature review. In C. Bepko (Ed.), Feminism and addiction (pp. 19-48). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
11. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.
12. Granovetter, M. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
13. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Kravetz, D., & Jones, L. (1992). Women Reaching Women: A project on alcohol and other drug abuse. In F. D. Perlmutter (Ed.), Alternative social agencies (pp. 45-58). Binghamton, NY: Haworth.
15. Lewis, J. (1994). Issues of gender and culture in substance abuse treatment. In J. Lewis (Ed.), Addictions: Concepts and strategies for treatment. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen.
16. Maglin, A. (1974). Sex role differences in heroin addiction. Social Casework, 55, 160-167.
17. Marsh, J. (1982). Public issues and private problems: Women and drug use. Journal of Social Issues, 38(2), 153-165.
18. Moise, R, Reed, B., & Ryan, V. (1982). Issues in the treatment of heroin-addicted women: A comparison of men and women entering two types of drug abuse programs. The International Journal of the Addictions, 17(1), 109-139.
19. Polit, D., Nuttall, R, & Hunter, J. (1976). Women and drugs: A look at some of the issues. Urban and Social Change Review, 9(2), 9-16.
20. Root, M. (1989). Treatment failures: The role of sexual victimization in women's addictive behavior. American Journal of Orthopsychiatrist, 59(4), 542-549.
21. Rosenbaum, M. (1981). Women on heroin. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
22. Ryan, V. (1981). Differences between males and females in drug treatment programs. In A. Schecter (Ed.), Drug dependence and alcoholism. New York: Plenum.
23. Woodhouse, L. (1990). An exploratory study of the use of life history methods to determine treatment needs for female substance abusers. Response, 13(3), 12-15.