-
3
-
-
84936117949
-
-
R. v. Thornton [1992] 1 All E.R. 306; R. v. Ahluwalia [1992] 4 All E.R. 889.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
84936091054
-
-
R. v. Camplin [1978] 2 All E.R. 168 and see now R. v. Morhall (1994) 98 Cr.App.R. 108.
-
-
-
-
7
-
-
84936101657
-
-
[1949] 1 All E.R. 932.
-
-
-
-
8
-
-
84936145701
-
-
[1992] 1 All E.R. 306, 313b–314c.
-
-
-
-
9
-
-
84936068929
-
-
[1992] 4 All E.R. 889, 894b–896g.
-
-
-
-
10
-
-
84936155966
-
-
Ibid, at 896h–899g.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
84936116089
-
-
See section 4, infra.
-
-
-
-
12
-
-
84936127426
-
-
Supra n.8, at 314h–315g.
-
-
-
-
13
-
-
84936071047
-
-
Instead, she was blamed for consistently denying an intention to stab Malcolm: ibid, at 315g–316g.
-
-
-
-
14
-
-
84936077715
-
-
Supra n.9, at 899g–900f.
-
-
-
-
15
-
-
84936121883
-
-
See Nicolson and Sanghvi, supra n.1, at 736.
-
-
-
-
16
-
-
84936077858
-
-
Indeed, the Ahluwalia decision opens with a recognition that the case had “aroused much public attention”: supra n.9, at 891g-h.
-
-
-
-
20
-
-
84936108409
-
-
[1992] 1 All E.R. 306, 308h–311g and [1992] 4 All E.R. 889, 891j–893h, respectively. All subsequent references and quotations from the cases are contained in these passages.
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
84936149273
-
Femininity as Marginalia: Conjugal Homicide and the Judgement of Sexual Difference
-
Sean, McVeigh, Peter, Rush, Alison, Young, Oxford University Press, Oxford
-
(1995)
Criminal Legal Practices
-
-
Young1
-
30
-
-
84936150370
-
-
Note the echoes of the language of battered women syndrome. See section 4, infra.
-
-
-
-
32
-
-
84936062956
-
-
See also [1992] 4 All E.R. 889, 891, 893d-e.
-
-
-
-
34
-
-
84936140807
-
-
Even those features of his personal biography relevant to Sara's ordeal were presented as simply details relating to Malcolm: see section 2.1.
-
-
-
-
35
-
-
84936098966
-
-
See section 2.2.
-
-
-
-
36
-
-
84936149273
-
Femininity as Marginalia: Conjugal Homicide and the Judgement of Sexual Difference
-
Sean, Mcvzigh, Peter, Push, Alison, Young, Oxford University Press, Oxford
-
(1995)
Criminal Legal Practices
-
-
Young1
-
38
-
-
84936110247
-
-
See also section 2.5
-
-
-
-
39
-
-
84936102108
-
-
See the first quotation at p.199, above. This was possible because the jury's rejection of the accident theory was not appealable.
-
-
-
-
45
-
-
84936096400
-
-
Cf. Lady Macbeth in Macbeth, Act I, sc. V, 38–40: “Unsex me here, / And fill me, from the crown to the toe, top-full / Of direst cruelty”. It is note-worthy that Lady Macbeth's complicity in murder ultimately drove her mad.
-
-
-
-
50
-
-
84936125186
-
-
Whereas provocation is tested according to the standard of the reasonable person with the same gender as the defendant (see text at n.6, supra), no such qualification has been made to the self-defence standard.
-
-
-
-
53
-
-
84936133559
-
-
See section 1.2, supra.
-
-
-
-
57
-
-
84936131892
-
-
Nicolson and Sanghvi, supra n.1, at 737.
-
-
-
|