Using a Curvilinear Grid to Construct Symmetry-Preserving Discretizations for Lagrangian Gas Dynamics

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 149, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 389-417

  Margolin, Len ^a   Shashkov, Mikhail ^b  

^a LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b MS B284   (United States)

Author keywords

Curvilinear grids; Grid reconstruction; Invariant discretizations; Preservation of symmetry

Indexed keywords

DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS; NUMERICAL METHODS;

CURVILINEAR GRIDS; CYLINDRICAL SYMMETRY; DISCRETIZATIONS; GRID RECONSTRUCTION; INVARIANT DISCRETIZATION; LAGRANGIAN; ORIGINAL DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS; PLANE SYMMETRY; PRESERVATION OF SYMMETRIES; SPHERICAL SYMMETRY;

GAS DYNAMICS;

EID: 0001121738     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jcph.1998.6161     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. O. M. Belotserkovskii, V. V. Demchenko, V. I. Kosarev, and A. S. Kholodov, Numerical simulation of some problems of laser compression of shells, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 18, 117 (1978).
2. D. J. Benson, Computational methods in Lagrangian and Eulerian hydrocodes, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 99, 235 (1992).
3. E. J. Caramana and P. P. Whalen, Numerical preservation of symmetry properties of continuum problems, J. Comput. Phys. 141, 174 (1998).
4. E. J. Caramana and M. J. Shashkov, Elimination of artificial grid distortion and hourglass-type motions by means of Lagrangian subzonal masses and pressures, J. Comput. Phys. 142, 521 (1998).
5. E. J. Caramana, M. J. Shashkov, and P. P. Whalen, Formulations of artificial viscosity for multi-dimensional shock wave computations, J. Comput. Phys. 144, 70 (1998).
6. E. J. Caramana, D. E. Burton, M. J. Shashkov, and P. P. Whalen, The construction of compatible hydrodynamics algorithms utilizing conservation of total energy, J. Comput. Phys. 146, 227 (1998).
7. J. Saltzman and P. Colella, Second-Order Upwind Transport Methods for Lagrangian Hydrodynamics, Report LA-UR-85-678, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM.
8. P. G. Ciarlet and R-A. Raviart, Interpolation theory over curved elements, with applications to finite element methods, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 1, 217 (1972).
9. P. G. Ciarlet and R-A. Raviart, The combined effect of curved boundaries and numerical integration in isoparametric finite element methods, in The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations, edited by A. K. Aziz (Academic Press, New York, 1972), pp. 409-475.
10. V. A. Dorodnytsin, Finite difference models entirely inheriting continuous symmetry of original differential equations, Internat. J. Modern Phys. C 5, 723 (1994).
11. J. K. Dukowicz and B. Meltz, Vorticity errors in multidimensional Lagrangian codes, J. Comput. Phys. 99, 115 (1992).
12. M. H. Emery, J. H. Gardner, R. H. Lehmberg, and S. P. Obenschain, Hydrodynamics target response to an induced spatial incoherence-smoothed laser beam, Phys. Fluids B 3, 2640 (1991).
13. R. G. Evans, A. J. Bennet, and G. J. Pert, Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in laser-accelerated targets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1639 (1982).
14. J. R. Freeman, M. J. Clauser, and S. L. Thompson, Rayleigh-Taylor instabilities in inertial-confinement fusion targets, Nuclear Fusion 17, 223 (1997).
15. S. K. Godunov, A. V. Zabrodin, and M. Ya. Ivanov, et al., Numerical Solution of Multidimensional Problems of Gas Dynamics (Nauka, Moscow, 1976). [In Russian]
16. P. S. Huyakorn and P. F. Andersen, A curvilinear finite element model for simulating two-well tracer tests and transport in stratified aquifer, Water Resources Res. 22, 663 (1986).
17. J. M. Hyman and M. Shashkov, Natural discretizations for the divergence, gradient, and curl on logically rectangular grids, Internat. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 33, 81 (1997).
18. J. M. Hyman and M. Shashkov, The adjoint operators for natural discretizations for the divergence, gradient and curl on logically rectangular grids, IMACS J. Appl. Numer. Math. 25, 413 (1997).
19. J. M. Hyman and M. Shashkov, The orthogonal decomposition theorems for mimetic finite difference methods, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., in press.
20. J. M. Hyman and M. Shashkov, The approximation of boundary conditions for mimetic finite difference methods, Internat. J. Comput. Math. Appl. 36, 79 (1988).
21. P. M. Knupp and S. Steinberg, The Fundamentals of Grid Generation (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1993).
22. V. A. Korobytsin, Invariant variational-difference schemes and conservation laws, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 29, 71 (1989).
23. A. M. Latypov, Approximate Lie group-analysis of finite-difference equations, Dynam. Continuous Discrete Impulsive Systems 3, 483 (1997).
24. D. Leutloff, K. G. Roesner, and R. C. Srivastava, Numerical investigation of three-dimensional shock focusing effects by invariant difference scheme, Fluid Dynam. Res. 10, 469 (1992).
25. L. Margolin and B. Nichols, Fundamental considerations in the integration of the momentum equations in finite difference codes, in Proc. of 3rd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Laminar and Turbulent Flow (University of Washington, 1983).
26. L. G. Margolin and B. D. Nichols, Momentum Control Volumes for Finite Difference Codes, Report LA-UR-83-524, Los Alamos National Laboratory, NM, 1983.
27. L. G. Margolin and M. Shashkov, Preserving symmetries in Lagrangian hydro codes, unpublished.
28. W. F. Noh, Errors for calculations of strong shocks using an artificial viscosity and an artificial heat flux, J. Comput. Phys. 72, 72 (1978).
29. M. Shashkov, Conservative Finite-Difference Methods on General Grids (CRC Press, Boca Raton, 1995).
30. M. Shashkov and S. Steinberg, Support-operator finite-difference algorithms for general elliptic problems, J. Comput. Phys. 118, 131 (1995).
31. M. Shashkov and S. Steinberg, Solving diffusion equations with rough coefficients in rough grids, J. Comput. Phys. 129, 383 (1996).
32. A. S. Shvedov, A difference scheme for the equation of gas dynamics which conserves the group properties of solutions, Math. Notes 48, 1064 (1990).
33. L. V. Shurshalov, The choice of the initial divergent form of the equations for calculating axisymmetric flows by finite-difference methods, USSR Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 20, 265 (1980).
34. A. Solov'ov, E. Solov'ova, V. Tishkin, A. Favorskii, and M. Shashkov, Dirichlet-particle method difference schemes, conserving the one-dimensionality of gas-dynamics flow in rectangular, cylindrical and spherical coordinates, Differential Equations 23, 1443 (1987).
35. A. Solov'ev and M. Shashkov, Difference scheme for the Dirichlet-particle method in cylindrical coordinates, conserving symmetry of gas-dynamical flow, Differential Equations 24, 817 (1988).
36. P. Silvester and R. Rafinejad, Curvilinear finite elements for two-dimensional saturable magnetic fields, IEEE Trans. Power Apparatus Systems 93, 1861 (1974).
37. R. P. J. Town and A. R. Bell, Three-dimensional simulations of the implosion of inertial confinement fusion targets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1863 (1991).
38. V. F. Tishkin, N. N. Turina, and A. P. Favorskii, Difference schemes for calculating hydrodynamical flows in cylindrical coordinates, Preprint 23, Institute of Applied Mathematics of Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia, 1978. [In Russian]
39. P. P. Volosevich, and E. G. Gamalii, et al., Two-dimensional effects in laser compression of glass shells, JETP Lett. 24, 252 (1976).
40. R. F. Warming and B. J. Hyett, The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite-difference methods, J. Comput. Phys. 14, 159 (1974).
41. M. Zlamal, The finite element method in domains with curved boundaries, Internat. J. Numer. Meth. Engrg. 5, 367 (1973).
42. M. Zlamal, Curved elements in the finite element method, I, SIAM J. Numer. Anal. 10, 229 (1973).