A comparison of methods for the calculation of NMR chemical shifts

Journal of Chemical Physics

Volumn 111, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 1815-1822

  Gregor, Thomas ^a,b,d   Mauri, Francesco ^a,b,c   Car, Roberto ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^b INSTITUT ROMAND DE RECHERCHE NUMÉRIQUE EN PHYSIQUE DES MATÉRIAUX IRRMA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PIERRE ET MARIE CURIE   (France)

^d PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001108719     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.479451     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Encyclopedia of NMR, edited by D. M. Grant and R. K. Harris (Wiley & Sons, England, 1996).
2. W. Kutzelnigg, J. Mol. Struct.: THEOCHEM 202, 11 (1989).
3. R. Ditchfield, J. Chem. Phys. 56, 5688 (1972).
4. W. Kutzelnigg, U. Fleischer, and M. Schindler, NMR Basic Principles and Progress (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1990), Vol. 23, p. 165.
5. T. A. Keith and R. F. W. Bader, Chem. Phys. Lett 194, 1 (1992).
6. T. A. Keith and R. F. W. Bader, Chem. Phys. Lett. 210, 223 (1993).
7. J. R. Cheeseman, G. W. Trucks, T. A. Keith, and M. J. Frisch, J. Chem. Phys. 104, 5497 (1996).
8. F. Mauri, B. G. Pfrommer, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 5300 (1996).
9. Y. Y. Yoon, B. G. Pfrommer, F. Mauri, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 3388 (1998).
10. B. G. Pfrommer, F. Mauri, and S. G. Louie (unpublished).
11. F. Mauri, B. G. Pfrommer, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 2340 (1997).
12. In principle, in the presence of a magnetic field one should consider a dependence of the exchange correlation functional on the current density as in current density functional theory (CDFT) (see Ref. 13). However, calculations using approximated CDFT-funcrionals (see Ref. 14) have shown that σ̈ has a negligible dependence on the current density. Therefore it is omitted here.
13. G. Vignale and M. Rasolt, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 2360 (1987).
14. A. M. Lee, N. C. Handy, and S. M. Colwell, J. Chem. Phys. 103, 10 095 (1995).
15. Equation (3) is obtained by the linear variation of the Hamiltonian of the system with respect to an applied magnetic field. Within DFT this linear variation is given by H9(1)=(A·p+p·A)/2c. Notice that within DFT and contrary to CDFT or Hartree-Fock, there is no linear variation of the self-consistent part of the potential energy since, for magnetic perturbations, the linear variation of the charge density is zero.
16. R. Loudon, The Quantum Theory of Light (Clarendon, Oxford, 1973), pp. 77.
17. GAUSSIAN 94, Revision B.1, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, P. M. W. Gill, B. G. Johnson, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, T. Keith, G. A. Petersson, J. A. Montgomery, K. Raghavachari, M. A. Al-Laham, V. G. Zakrzewski, J. V. Ortiz, J. B. Foresman, J. Cioslowski, B. B. Stefanov, A. Nanayakkara, M. Challacombe, C. Y. Peng, P. Y. Ayala, W. Chen, M. W. Wong, J. L. Andres, E. S. Replogle, R. Gomperts, R. L. Martin, D. J. Fox, J. S. Binkley, D. J. Defrees, J. Baker, J. P. Stewart, M. Head-Gordon, C. Gonzalez, and J. A. Pople, Gaussian, Inc., Pittsburgh, PA, 1995, 1975), Chap. 5.
18. F. Mauri and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4246 (1996); K. Ohno, F. Mauri, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 56, 1009 (1997).
19. F. Mauri and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4246 (1996); K. Ohno, F. Mauri, and S. G. Louie, Phys. Rev. B 56, 1009 (1997).
20. D. Woon and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4572 (1995); T. H. Dunning, Jr., ibid. 90, 1007 (1989).
21. D. Woon and T. H. Dunning, Jr., J. Chem. Phys. 103, 4572 (1995); T. H. Dunning, Jr., ibid. 90, 1007 (1989).
22. The cc-pCVnZ basis sets for third-row elements are still unpublished and were obtained by personal communication from T. H. Dunning, Jr., and K. Peterson.
23. See http://www.emsl.pnl.gov:2080/forms/basisform.html
24. A. D. Becke, J. Chem. Phys. 98, 1372 (1993).
25. R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980); T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 294 (1983); M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265 (1984).
26. R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980); T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 294 (1983); M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265 (1984).
27. R. Krishnan, J. S. Binkley, R. Seeger, and J. A. Pople, J. Chem. Phys. 72, 650 (1980); T. Clark, J. Chandrasekhar, and P. v. R. Schleyer, J. Comput. Chem. 4, 294 (1983); M. J. Frisch, J. A. Pople, and J. S. Binkley, J. Chem. Phys. 80, 3265 (1984).
28. G. Schreckenbach and T. Ziegler, Int. J. Quantum Chem. 60, 753 (1996).