Dynamics of coding in communicating with chaos

Physical Review E - Statistical Physics, Plasmas, Fluids, and Related Interdisciplinary Topics

Volumn 58, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 1724-1736

  Bollt, Erik ^a   Lai, Ying Cheng ^b  

^a UNITED STATES NAVAL ACADEMY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001082245     PISSN: 1063651X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.58.1724     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. S. Hayes, C. Grebogi, and E. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3031 (1993)
2. Phys. Rev. Lett.E. Rosa, S. Hayes, and C. Grebogi, 78, 1247 (1997)
3. E. Bollt and M. Dolnik, Phys. Rev. E 55, 6404 (1997).PLEEE8
4. S. Hayes, C. Grebogi, E. Ott, and A. Mark, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 1781 (1994).PRLTAO
5. C. E. Shannon and W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (The University of Illinois Press, 1964).
6. R. E. Blahut, Principles and Practice of Information Theory (Addison-Wesley, New York, 1988).
7. R. C. Adler, A. C. Konheim, and M. H. McAndrew, Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 114, 309 (1965).TAMTAM
8. It should be noted that hT=ln 2 is not a proof that a system is random since deterministic chaotic systems may also have a topological entropy of ln 2. For instance, the topological entropy of the logistic map at r=4 is equal to ln 2, but the logistic map is deterministic.
9. E. Bollt, Y.-C. Lai, and C. Grebogi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 3787 (1997).PRLTAO
10. E. N. Lorenz, J. Atmos. Terr. Phys. 20, 130 (1963).JATPA3
11. K. Cuomo and A. V. Oppenheim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 65 (1993).PRLTAO
12. For chaotic sets arising in two-dimensional invertible maps, every point on the set has a stable and an unstable direction. Distances along the stable (the unstable) direction shrink (expands) on the average exponentially in time. A chaotic set is hyperbolic if there is a stable and an unstable direction at each point of the set, and the angle between them is bounded away from zero. Otherwise the set is nonhyperbolic. In general, nonhyperbolicity is a complicating feature because it can cause fundamental difficulties in the study of the chaotic systems, a known one being the shadowability of numerical trajectories by true trajectories [see, for example, C. Grebogi, S. M. Hammel, and J. A. Yorke, J. Complexity 3, 136 (1987)
13. C. GrebogiS. M. HammelJ. A. YorkeBull. Am. Math. Soc. 19, 465 (1988)
14. C. Grebogi, S. M. Hammel, J. A. Yorke, and T. Sauer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 1527 (1990)
15. T. Sauer and J. A. Yorke, Nonlinearity 4, 961 (1991)].NONLE5
16. P. Grassberger, H. Kantz, and U. Moenig, J. Phys. A 22, 5217 (1989).JPHAC5
17. M. Hénon, Commun. Math. Phys. 50, 69 (1976).CMPHAY
18. P. Cvitanovic, G. Gunaratne, and I. Procaccia, Phys. Rev. A 38, 1503 (1988).PLRAAN
19. C. Robinson, Dynamical Systems: Stability, Symbol Dynamics, and Chaos (CRC Press, Ann Arbor, 1995).
20. G. Dahlqust and A. Björck, Numerical Methods (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1974).
21. P. Collet and J.-P. Eckmann, Iterated Maps on the Interval as Dynamical Systems, Progress in Physics Vol. I (Birkhäuser, Boston, 1980).
22. B.-L. Hao, Elementary Symbolic Dynamics and Chaos in Dissipative Systems (World Scientific, Singapore, 1989).
23. See, for example, K. Aligood, T. Sauer, and J. A. Yorke, Chaos, an Introduction to Dynamical Systems (Springer, New York, 1997).
24. W. de Melo and S. van Strein, One-Dimensional Dynamics (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992).
25. J. Milnor and W. Thurston, On Iterated Maps of the Interval I and II (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1977).
26. See also, J. Guckenheimer and P. Holmes, Nonlinear Oscillations, Dynamical Systems, and Bifurcations of Vector Fields (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1983).
27. A. N. Kolmogorov and S. V. Fomin, Introductory Real Analysis (Dover Publications, New York, 1970).