Radical Ion Probes. 7. Behavior of a "Hypersensitive" Probe for Single Electron Transfer in Reactions Not Involving Electron Transfer

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 62, Issue 16, 1997, Pages 5550-5556

  Tanko, James M ^a   Brammer Jr , Larry E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001064451     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo970584w     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Tanko, J. M.; Brammer, L. E. Jr.; Hervas', M.; Campos, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1994, 1407.
2. Tanko, J. M.; Brammer, L. E., Jr. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1994, 1165.
3. Andrieux, C. P.; Hapiot, P.; Pinson, J.; Savéant, J.-M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 7783.
4. RN1 reaction, see: Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3174.
5. RN1 reaction, see: Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3174.
6. RN1 reaction, see: Bunnett, J. F.; Creary, X. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 3174.
7. -1, see: Maillard, B.; Ingold, K. U.; Scaiano, J. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 705, 5095.
8. -1 for R = 1°, 2°, or 3° alkyl. See: Franz, J. A.; Bushaw, B. A.; Alnajjar, M. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 777, 268.
9. -1, see: Curran, D. P.; Martin-Esker, A. A.; Ko, S.-B.; Newcomb, M. J. Org. Chem. 1993, 58, 4691.
10. Gelles, E.; Hughes, E. D.; Ingold, C. K. J. Chem. Soc. 1954, 2918.
11. Hartshorn, S. R. Aliphatic Nucleophilic Substitution, Cambridge University Press: London, 1973; pp 12-13.
12. Kinoshita, T.; Ueda, H.; Takeuchi, K. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2 1993, 603.
13. - to the solution results in a depression in reaction rate (i.e., the common-ion effect). See ref 9.
14. Compound 1 has a tendency to polymerize in MeOH and EtOH, and as a consequence, the mass balances were only 56 and 72%, respectively, in these two solvents.
15. Smith, S. G.; Fainberg, A. H.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1961, 83, 618.
16. Grunwald, E.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 846. For a review, see: Bentley, T. W.; Llewellyn, G. In Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry, Vol. 17; Taft, R. W., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1990; PP 121-158.
17. Grunwald, E.; Winstein, S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1948, 70, 846. For a review, see: Bentley, T. W.; Llewellyn, G. In Progress in Physical Organic Chemistry, Vol. 17; Taft, R. W., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1990; PP 121-158.
18. neo) values.
19. - and either 1 or 2 by UV proved troublesome because the reactions were over in less than 5 min, and the results were unacceptably erratic.
20. Dewar, M. J. S.; Zoebisch, E. G.; Healy, E. F.; Stewart, J. J. P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1985, 707, 3902.
21. For both 1 and 8, the bulky tert-butyl groups at the ortho position are expected to severely impede coordination of a Lewis acid with the carbonyl oxygen. We suspect that most of the observed changes in chemical shift observed for 8 are more a function of changes in the dielectric constant of the medium, rather than any close association of solvent or counterion with the oxygen.
22. Boger, D. L.; Johnson, D. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 33, 1438. See also: Boger, D. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 20.
23. Boger, D. L.; Johnson, D. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1996, 33, 1438. See also: Boger, D. L. Acc. Chem. Res. 1995, 28, 20.
24. N2/ET mechanistic continuum, see: Fross, A. Theoretical and Physical Principles of Organic Reactivity, Wiley: New York, 1995; pp 222-232.
25. Still, W.; Kahn, M.; Mitra, A. J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 2923.
26. (a) Portnykh, N. V.; Volod'kin, A. A.; Ershov, V. V Bull. Acad. Chem. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1966, 2181.
27. (b) Portnykh, N. V.; Volod'kin, A. A.; Ershov, V. V. Bull. Acad. Chem. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1967, 1328.
28. (c) Portnykh, N. V.; Volod'kin, A. A.; Volod'kina, V. I. Bull. Acad. Chem. Sci. USSR, Div. Chem. Sci. 1970, 688.
29. (d) Schwartz, L. H.; Flor, R. V.; Gullo, V. P. J. Org. Chem. 1974, 39, 219.
30. Aldrich Handbook of Fine Chemicals; Aldrich Chemical Company; Milwaukee, WI, 1993; p 604.